Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solvation interaction

The general formula for the initiator species can be written H B, where the degree of separation or ion pairing depends on the polarity of the medium and the possibility of specific solvation interactions. If we represent the equilibrium constant for the reactions in (6.DD) and (6.EE) by K, the initiator concentration can be written as... [Pg.412]

This difference can also be explained based on the difference in solvation interactions. In addition, a stronger effect is related to tantalum s higher effective charge compared to that of niobium. [Pg.133]

The retention mechanism of organic solutes by porous polymer beads remains ambiguous [478]. At low temperatures adso tion dominates but at higher temperatures the polymer beads could behave as a highly extended liquid with solvation interactions. The evidence for a partition mechanism is not very strong and its importance, at present, remains speculative. Like other adsorbents it has proven possible to control retention and enhance efficiency by diluting porous polymers with an inert support material (479). [Pg.108]

In polar media, electron transfer is associated with a marked change in the solvation shell of the species concerned. This strong solvation interaction between ions and solvent dipoles mediates electron transfer between the electrode and an electroactive species, and between two components of a redox system. Fluctuations... [Pg.12]

Examination of ionic liquid solvation interactions and thermodynamic properties using gas-liquid chromatography... [Pg.141]

Separation selectivify is one of the most important characteristics of any chromatographic sfationary phase. The functionality of the cation and anion and their unique combinations result in ILs with not only tunable physicochemical properties (i.e., viscosity, thermal stability, and surface tension), but also unique separation selectivities. Although the selectivity for different analytes is dominated by the solvation interactions imparted by the cation and anion, all ILs exhibit an apparent and xmique dual-nature selectivity that is uncharacteristic of other popular nonionic stationary phases. Dual-nature selectivity provides the stationary phases the ability to separate nonpolar molecules like a nonpolar stationary phase but yet separate polar molecules like a polar stationary phase [7,8]. Typically, GC stationary phases are classified in terms of their polarity (see Section 4.2.2) and the polarity of the employed stationary phase should closely match that of the analytes being separated. ILs possess a multitude of different but simultaneous solvation interactions that give rise to unique interactions with solute molecules. This is illustrated by Figure 4.2 in which a mixture of polar and nonpolar analytes are subjected to separation on a 1-benzyl-3-methylimidazolium triflate ([BeQlm][TfO] IL 6 in Table 4.1) column [21]. [Pg.153]

The study of ILs in GLC has yielded important information regarding solute-solvent interactions providing valuable insights into their complex solvation interactions and thermodynamic properties for mixed solvent systems. Moreover, ILs have proven to be an important new class of stationary phases for the separation of a wide variety of different analytes. IL stationary phases will soon be commercially available which will inevitably promote further improvements in separation selectivity, thermal stability, immobilization bonding chemistry/stationary phase stability, and will broaden the range of separated compounds. IL-based stationary phases also hold great promise in GC mass spectrometry where the dual-nature selectivity of the stationary phase eliminates the need for frequent changing of columns. [Pg.160]

Solutes that, whatever their state of aggregation, undergo solvation interactions with the solvent beyond those due to dispersion forces, exhibit specific contributions to the solubility, that can be attributed to dipole-dipole and dipole-induced dipole interactions and electron-pair or hydrogen-bond donation by the solvent to the solute or vice versa. [Pg.79]

There are certain instances where this approach may be regarded as an attractive option. For example, Cossi and Crescenzi (2003) found that accurate computation of NMR chemical shifts for alcohols, etliers, and carbonyls in aqueous solution required at least one explicit solvent shell, but that beyond that shell a continuum could be used to replace what would otherwise be a need for a much larger cluster. However, just as the strengths of the two models are combined, so are the weaknesses. A typical first shell of solvent for a small molecule may be expected to be composed of a dozen or so solvent molecules. The resulting supermolecular cluster will inevitably be characterized by a large number of accessible structures that are local minima on the cluster PES, so that statistical sampling will have to be undertaken to obtain a proper equilibrium distribution. Thus, QM methods require a substantial investment of computational resources. In addition, certain technical points require attention, e.g., how does one keep the first solvent shell from exchanging with the continuum since both, in principle, foster identical solvation interactions ... [Pg.451]

Salt concentration. The addition of a small amount of neutral salt usually increases the solubility of a protein, and changes the interaction between the molecules as well as changing some amino-acid charges. The overall effect is to increase the solubility. This phenomenon is known as salting in. However, at high concentrations of salts the solvating interactions between protein and water are reduced, and the protein may be precipitated from solution—a process termed salting out. [Pg.276]

Solutes that, whatever their state of aggregation, undergo solvation interactions with the solvent beyond those due to dispersion forces, exhibit specific contributions to the solubility, that can be attributed to dipole-dipole and dipole-induced dipole interactions and electron-pair or hydrogen bond donation by the solvent to the solute or vice versa. Equations (2.10), (2.14) and (2.15) must then be modified to take these interactions into account by the addition of appropriate terms. Various approaches have been proposed for such additional interactions, and here the following is adopted, following Yalkowski (Yalkowski 1988) ... [Pg.100]

This classification has been broadened39,40 by replacing the Brpnsted acid (proton donor) with a Lewis acid (an electron acceptor) and the Brpnsted base with a Lewis base (an electron donor). (A Brpnsted acid is a Lewis acid but not necessarily vice versa.) Solvent-proton interactions are therefore included as one subdivision of this classification, but many solvation reactions of cations with solvents also will be included as reactions of Lewis acid-base systems. This approach still does not solve the problem of fitting specific solvation interactions into the classification scheme. For example, acetonitrile behaves as a good Lewis base toward silver ion, but a poor one toward hydronium ion. The broader scheme also does not specifically take into account hydrogenbonding effects in hydroxylic and other solvents, which affect both the dielectric... [Pg.312]

In the second chapter, Appleby presents a detailed discussion and review in modem terms of a central aspect of electrochemistry Electron Transfer Reactions With and Without Ion Transfer. Electron transfer is the most fundamental aspect of most processes at electrode interfaces and is also involved intimately with the homogeneous chemistry of redox reactions in solutions. The subject has experienced controversial discussions of the role of solvational interactions in the processes of electron transfer at electrodes and in solution, especially in relation to the role of Inner-sphere versus Outer-sphere activation effects in the act of electron transfer. The author distils out the essential features of electron transfer processes in a tour de force treatment of all aspects of this important field in terms of models of the solvent (continuum and molecular), and of the activation process in the kinetics of electron transfer reactions, especially with respect to the applicability of the Franck-Condon principle to the time-scales of electron transfer and solvational excitation. Sections specially devoted to hydration of the proton and its heterogeneous transfer, coupled with... [Pg.552]


See other pages where Solvation interaction is mentioned: [Pg.195]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.702]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.808]    [Pg.809]    [Pg.812]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.722]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.168]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.86 , Pg.141 , Pg.146 , Pg.153 , Pg.157 , Pg.159 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.65 ]




SEARCH



Charge-transfer interactions solvation

Electrostatic interactions solvation free energy calculations

Induced Dipole Interactions in the Primary Solvation Sheath

Interactions solvation-desolvation

Solvated interactions

Solvated interactions

Solvation electrostatic interaction energy

Solvation many-body interaction terms

Solvation/solvents interactions

The solvation effect solute-solvent interaction

© 2024 chempedia.info