Solvated electron interfacial

Important differences also exist between plasmas and electrolyte solutions. In the latter, below the critical temperature (374°C for water), the density is not an independent variable at constant temperature, except when the system is pressurized, and even then the density can be varied only over a narrow range. Above the critical temperature, the density can be varied over a wide range by changing the volume, but, except for the work by Franck (18) and by Marshall (79), for example, on ionic conductivity, these systems are unexplored. This is particularly true for electrode and electrochemical kinetic studies. In the case of plasmas, the density may be varied under ordinary formation conditions over a wide range and, as shown in Figure 6-2, this also results in the unique feature that the temperatures of the electrons and the ions may be quite different. Another important difference between electrolytes and plasmas is the fact that free electrons exist in the latter but not in the former (an exception is liquid ammonia, in which solvated electrons can exist at appreciable concentrations). Thus, interfacial charge transfer between a conducting solid and a plasma is expected to be substantially different from that between an electrode and an electrolyte solution. The extent of these differences currently is unknown. 

Interfacial electron transfer is the critical process occurring in all electrochemical cells in which molecular species are oxidized or reduced. While transfer of an electron between an electrode and a solvated molecule or ion is conceptually a simple reaction, rates of heterogeneous electron transfer processes depend on a multitude of factors and can vary over many orders of magnitude. Since control of interfacial electron transfer rates is usually essential for successful operation of electrochemical devices, understanding the kinetics of these reactions has been and remains a challenging and technologically important goal. 

Given that interfacial solvation affects chemical transport/ surface reactivity and electron transfer/ and macromolecular self-assembly/ predictive models of solvent-solute interactions near surfaces will afford researchers deeper insights into a host of phenomena in biology, physics, and engineering. Research in this area should aid efforts to develop a general, experimentally tested, and quantitative understanding of solution-phase surface chemistry. 

In excerpt I5D, Walker begins with a statement of the topic (solvation at hydrophobic and hydrophilic solid-liquid interfaces) and then moves directly to the signihcance of the work. He emphasizes the need for information on interfacial phenomena and points out possible applications of his work for other areas of science (molecular recognitions, electron transfer, and macromolecular self-assembly). He goes on to describe his experimental methods, focusing on three aspects of his approach (in order of difficulty) equilibrium measurements, time-resolved studies, and distance-dependent measurements of solvation strength. 

Wang et al, 2003 Wang et al, 2004). The time resolution of this technique is inversely proportional to the spectral resolution. With 10 cm spectral resolution, a time resolution of -1.5 ps can be obtained. These probe techniques can be combined with an excitation pulse in a pump/probe scheme to measure interface selective dynamics. They have been used to study solvation dynamics at a liquid-liquid interface (Zimdars et al, 1999) and vibrational relaxation on a metal surface (Bonn et al, 2000 Bonn et al, 2001). Although not yet reported, the technique should also be applicable to the study of interfacial electron-transfer dynamics. 

The third part of this text focuses on several important dynamical processes in condensed phase molecular systems. These are vibrational relaxation (Chapter 13), Chemical reactions in the barrier controlled and diffusion controlled regimes (Chapter 14), solvation dynamics in dielectric environments (Chapter 15), electron transfer in bulk (Chapter 16), and interfacial (Chapter 17) systems and spectroscopy (Chapter 18). These subjects pertain to theoretical and experimental developments of the last half century some such as single molecule spectroscopy and molecular conduction—of the last decade. 

Through these well-known examples the effect of three basic features of organized assemblies can be visualized (1) inhomogeneous solvation properties, (2) interfacial potentials, and (3) spatial confinement. Apart from the last, the other aspects can be finely controlled at the polarizable ITIES. As we have seen in Section II, the Galvani potential difference not only affects the dynamics of photoinduced electron transfer, but also the concentration ratio of ionic species. 

According to electrochemical theory, the kinetics of an electrochemical reaction is controlled by the potential drop between the solid and solution phases [133-136]. A dynamic zone extending in both directions from the electrified interface over which this drop exists is called the double layer (DL) of charge. The DL in the solution is made up of adsorbed and solvated ions (molecules) and solvent. Its dense part, which is referred to as the Helmholtz layer (HL), plays the major role in the interfacial processes. At low ion concentration, there is also a diffuse layer Gouy layer) in the solution. The countercharged part of the DL in a metal electrode is comprised of a skin layer with an excess or a deficit of electrons. The DL in a semicondnctor electrode is called the space charge layer. It consists of an accumulation, depletion, or inversion layer with an excess or a deficit of electrons or holes and ionized donor or acceptor states, depending on... 

The discussions will be mostly centered on ideal systems in which the reactants are considered as particles with given redox properties and solvation energies present at the interfacial region between two dielectric media. In the case of electron transfer (ET), we shall concentrate... 

---