Solution stoichiometry titrations

Solution Stoichiometry Titration Using Molarity Titration Using Normality (Optional)... 

Now that we have discussed the concentration and dilution of solutions, we can examine the quantitative aspects of reactions in aqueous solution, or solution stoichiometry. Sections 4.6. 8 focus on two techniques for studying solution stoichiometry gravimetric analysis and titration. These techniques are important tools of quantitative analysis, which is the determination of the amount or concentration of a substance in a sample. 

SOLUTION STOICHIOMETRY AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS We see how the concepts of stoichiometry and concentration can be used to calculate amounts or concentrations of substances in solution through a common chemical practice called titration. 

SOLUTION STOICHIOMETRY AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS (SECTION 4.6) In the process called titration, we combine a solution of known concentration (a standard solution) with a solution of unknown concentration to determine the unknown concentration or the quantity of solute in the unknown. The point in the titration at which stoichiometricaUy equivalent quantities of reactants are brought together is called the equivalence point. An indicator can be used to show the end point of the titration, which coincides closely with the equivalence point. 

A common laboratory technique, called titration, requires understanding solution stoichiometry. A solution-phase reaction is carried out under controlled conditions so that the amount of one reactant can be determined with high precision. A carefully measured quantity of one reactant is placed in a beaker or flask. A dye called an indicator can be added to the solution. The second reactant is added in a controlled fashion, typically by using a burette (Figure 4.6). When the reaction is complete, the indicator changes color. When the indicator first changes color, we have a stoichiometric mixture of reactants. We know the number of moles of the first reactant (or the molarity and volume) and the volume of the second reactant used. So as long as we know the balanced equation for the reaction, we can find the unknown concentration of the second reactant. 

Solution Stoichiometry Quantitative studies of reactions in solution require that we know the concentration of the solution, which is usually represented by the molarity unit. These studies include gravimetric analysis, which involves the measurement of mass, and titrations in which the unknown concentration of a solution is determined by reaction with a solution of known concentration. 

In Chapter 3 we studied stoiehiometric calculations in terms of the mole method, which treats the eoeffieients in a balanced equation as the number of moles of reactants and products. In working with solutions of known molarity, we have to use the relationship MV = moles of solute. We will examine two types of common solution stoichiometry here gravimetric analysis and acid-base titration. 

The principles we learned in Chapter 13 (Section 13.8) on solution stoichiometry can be applied to a common laboratory procedure called a titration. In a titration, a substance in a solution of known concentration is reacted with another substance in a solution of unknown concentration. For example, consider the acid-base reaction between hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide ... 

Certain aqueous reactions are useful for determining how much of a particular substance is present in a sample. For example, if we want to know the concentration of lead in a sample of water, or if we need to know the concentration of an acid, knowledge of precipitation reactions, acid-base reactions, and solution stoichiometry will be useful. Two common types of such quantitative analyses are gravimetric analysis and acid-base titration. 

The same transformation is observed if the acidification around pH 2 is made by the addition of a solution of ferric ions. However, the phenomena are more complex and the characterization of the solution [by titration of excess Fe(lll) as Fe(OH)3 and titration of the released ferrous ions as Fe(OH)2] shows that in this case some ferric ions are fixed by the particles, and that ferrous ions are released into the solution in the stoichiometry [Fe(ll)soimio ]/[Fe(lll) jcj]= 1.5 [35]. The main effect of the Fe(Ill) addition is the significant structural disorder on the surface, unlike in the case of the acidification of suspensions with HCIO4 (Figure 9.7). The stoichiometry of the reaction is... 

This reaction occurs quickly and is of known stoichiometry. A titrant of SCN is easily prepared using KSCN. To indicate the titration s end point we add a small amount of Fe + to the solution containing the analyte. The formation of the red-colored Fe(SCN) + complex signals the end point. This is an example of a direct titration since the titrant reacts with the analyte. 

We can predict the pH at any point in the titration of a polyprotic acid with a strong base by using the reaction stoichiometry to recognize what stage we have reached in the titration. We then identify the principal solute species at that point and the principal proton transfer equilibrium that determines the pH. 

The chemical compositions of the samples, obtained from chemical analyses are reported in Table 1. In order to check the chemical analyses, the mother and washing liquors were collected, analysed and their acidity was titrated. In all cases, the alkaline cations were detected only as traces. The acidimetric titration allowed us to determine the HPA amount remaining in the solution. On the other hand, the samples separated after precipitation and washings were weighted in order to calculate the precipitate yields. The results are reported in table 1 where the samples are designated as MxY (M being the alkaline or ammonium cation, Y the heteroatom, x the stoichiometry deduced from chemical analyses. 

This method is primarily based on measurement of the electrical conductance of a solution from which, by previous calibration, the analyte concentration can be derived. The technique can be used if desired to follow a chemical reaction, e.g., for kinetic analysis or a reaction going to completion (e.g., a titration), as in the latter instance, which is a conductometric titration, the stoichiometry of the reaction forms the basis of the analysis and the conductometry, as a mere sensor, does not need calibration but is only required to be sufficiently selective. 

Spontaneous self assembly of a dinuclear triple helical complex is observed with linked bis-[4,5]-pineno-2,2 -bipyridines. Studies by electrospray mass spectrometry, CD and NMR determined that the major species in solution was a complex of Zn L = 2 3 stoichiometry with a triple helical structure and an enantiomerically pure homochiral configuration at the metal centers. The preference for the formation of one of the possible stereoisomers over the other is of interest.265 Another binuclear triple helical complex is formed from zinc addition to bis[5-(l-methyl-2-(6-methyl-2 -pyridyl)benzimidazolyl)]methane. Spectrophotometric titrations with a zinc solution... 

Such an electrochemical arrangement can also be used to transport oxygen from one electrode to the other by the imposition of an externally applied potential. This technique, known as coulometric titration , has been used to prepare flowing gas mixtures of oxygen/argon with a controlled oxygen partial pressure, to vary the non-stoichiometry of oxides, to study the thermodynamics of dilute oxygen solutions in metals, and to measure the kinetics of metal oxidation, as examples. 

For other cases, such as La3+ where more detail is required about the nature of the species present in solution, titration data can be computer fit to more complicated multi-equilibrium models containing Mx 1 v( OR)v forms whose stoichiometry is suggested by information gained from independent spectroscopic or kinetic techniques. One must be mindful of the pitfalls of simply fitting the potentiometric data to complex multi-component models for which there is no independent evidence for the various species. Without some evidence for the species put into the fit, the procedure simply becomes an uncritical mathematical exercise of adding and removing various real and proposed components until the goodness of fit is satisfactory. 

The potentiometric titrations of [Cu1(MeCN)4](CIO4), AgIC104, and AuIC104 with (Bu4N)0H(in MeOH) are illustrated in Figure 4, and demonstrate that each process has one-to-one stoichiometry. The three systems form precipitates such that all of the metal is removed from solution at the equivalence point. Addition of excess "OH causes some dissolution of the CuOH and AgOH precipitates, and appears as a second step for the titration curve of Ag(I) (Figure 4b). 

The concentration of a solution is determined by titration with a sample of known composition. (See the Stoichiometry chapter.)... 

The concentration of an acid or a base may be determined by titrating a solution of an unknown concentration with a solution of a known concentration. (See the chapter on Reactions and Periodicity and the chapter on Stoichiometry.)... 

Proton nmr titration experiments of [26] and [27] with KPF6 in acetonitrile revealed that in solution both compounds form 1 1 intramolecular sandwich complexes with the potassium cation. A number of alkyl-, vinyl- and azo-linked bis(benzo-15-crown-5) ligands are well known to exhibit this mode of K+ coordination. In the case of [26], a solid-state potassium complex was isolated whose elemental analysis and fast-atom bombardment mass spectrum ([26] K+ = 1083 complex ion) was in agreement with 1 1 complex stoichiometry (Fig. 20). 

The addition of tetrabutylammonium chloride to H solutions of [68] and [69] in deuteriated acetonitrile resulted in remarkable nmr shifts of the respective proton signals of both receptors. Of particular note were the substantial downfield shifts of the amide protons (AS = 1.28 ppm for [68] and 1.52 ppm for [69]) on addition of one equivalent of chloride. These results suggest that a significant —CO—NH-Cr hydrogen-bonding interaction contributes to the overall anion complexation process. Subsequent nmr titration curves suggesting 1 1 stoichiometry with anion complexes of [68] and [69] were found in all cases. Negligible shifts were observed under identi-... 

Proton nmr halide anion titrations reveal that the ethyl- [79], propyl-[80] and butyl- [81] linked derivatives (Fig. 43) form complexes of 1 1 stoichiometry in acetonitrile solution. Stability constant determinations suggest that the ethyl derivative [79] exhibits selectivity for the chloride anion in preference to bromide or iodide. As the chain length increases, so the selectivity for chloride decreases and also the magnitude of the stability constant which is evidence for an anionic chelate effect with the chloride anion. Receptors containing larger aryl [81], [83], [84] and alkylamino spacers [85] (Fig. 43) form complexes of 2 1 halide anion receptor stoichiometry. 

Although Freudenberg s hypothesis that complex-formation occurred by inclusion within the cavity was generally accepted, there was no direct evidence for this, either in solution or in the solid state. Broser and Lautsch had found by spectrophotometric titration that the complexes of a series of dyes with the cyclodextrins in solution obeyed the mass action law with a stoichiometry of 1 1. They suggested that association on the outside of the ring might not have a defined stoichiometric composition, and they thus interpreted their results as being consistent with inclusion by cyclodextrin. Their results were not conclusive, however. 

---