Solution intercalation/blending

Solvent blending Solvent blending, also called solution intercalation in the case of clay and other nanolayers, involves both dispersing the nanoadditive and dissolving the matrix polymer in a solvent or a solvent mixture. Three parameters have been considered to be important, particularly for clays, in choosing the surface treatment of the nanoadditives with this process The structure of the modifier, its miscibility with the polymer, and its thermal stability. The miscibility of the modifier here has two meanings miscibility with both the final polymer and the solvent chosen to dissolve the polymer. The modifier structure and its miscibility are perhaps more important than the thermal... 

A number of methods have frequently been employed in the production of nanocomposite materials. These include solution intercalation, melt intercalation, polymerization, sol-gel, deposition, magnetron sput-tering, laser, ultrasonication, supercritical fluid, etc. In PHA nanocomposite fabrication, solution intercalation and melt intercalation methods are the most widely explored procedures. However, use of in situ intercalative polymerization, supercritical fluids and electrospinning are shown to be promising and emerging techniques. The performance and quality of a nanocomposite depends on how well the nanofillers disperse or blend into the matrix. Therefore, these methods constitute different strategies to improve the composites thermo-mechanical and physico-chemical properties by enhancing efficient interactions between the nanofiller and the polymer matrices. 

Based on the above-mentioned methods, solution blending has been found to be the simplest method to be employed. Consequently, the authors have employed the technique with some modifications. This modified technique was known as the solution intercalation method. 

Solution blending was found to produce a mixed immiscible intercalated nanocomposite with the clay causing a change in the degradation path (94). In situ polymerisation of polymer layered silicate nanocomposites has been investigated (36). 

Examples of the synthesis of polysiloxane nanocomposites reported in the literature include Work by Ma et al (6) who modified montmorilIonite with short segments of PDMS and blended this into a polymer melt/solution to yield examples of fully exfoliated or intercalated PDMS/clay nanocomposites. Pan, Mark et al (7) synthesized well defined nano-fillers by reacting groups of four vinyl terminated POSS cages with a central siloxane core. These materials were subsequently chemically bonded into a PDMS network yielding a significant improvement in the mechanical properties of the polymer. 

Three main types of structures, which are shown in Fig. 5.3, can be obtained when a clay is dispersed in a polymer matrix (1) phase-separated structure, where the polymer chains did not intercalate the clay layers, leading to a structure similar to those of a conventional composite, (2) intercalated structure, where the polymer chains are intercalated between clay layers, forming a well ordered multilayer structure, which has superior properties to those of a conventional composite, and (3) structure exfoliated, where the clay is completely and uniformly dispersed in a polymeric matrix, maximizing the interactions polymer-clay and leading to significant improvements in physical and mechanical properties [2, 50-52]. Production of nanocomposites based on polymer/clay can be done basically in three ways (a) in situ polymerization, (b) prepared in solution and (c) preparation of the melt or melt blending [53]. 

Fig. 7. Schematic representation of various methods (Solution blending, melt blending, and in situ polymerization). The delaminated (or exfoliated) and intercalated morphologies are shown.

The same authors also applied the solution blending procedure to the preparation of LLDPE composites with a MMT organically modified with M3(Ci6)i (trimethyl hexadecyl ammonium ions). Intercalated nanocomposites were obtained, characterized by interlayer distances iooi of 3.54-3.85 nm, for organoclay loadings of 10-5 wt%, respectively (Figure 3.5). 

---