Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solution-diffusion model relationships development

Finely Porous Model. In this model, solute and solvent permeate the membrane via pores which connect the high pressure and low pressure faces of the membrane. The finely porous model, which combines a viscous flow model eind a friction model (7, ), has been developed in detail and applied to RO data by Jonsson (9-12). The most recent work of Jonsson (12) treated several organic solutes including phenol and octanol, both of which exhibit solute preferential sorption. In his paper, Jonsson compared several models including that developed by Spiegler eind Kedem (13) (which is essentially an irreversible thermodynamics treatment), the finely porous model, the solution-diffusion Imperfection model (14), and a model developed by Pusch (15). Jonsson illustrated that the finely porous model is similar in form to the Spiegler-Kedem relationship. Both models fit the data equally well, although not with total accuracy. The Pusch model has a similar form and proves to be less accurate, while the solution-diffusion imperfection model is even less accurate. [Pg.295]

Another model developed [57] for solute diffusion in osmotic dehydration of apple based on solids gain divided by water content M as a function of rate constant K, time (/), and a constant A was given as M = Kt + A. A relationship was established in the form of A" = T C" where rate parameter K is related to temperature T at different sucrose concentrations C. The average activation energy of the process was 28.2 kj/mol. [Pg.624]

Burns and Curtiss (1972) and Burns et al. (1984) have used the Facsimile program developed at AERE, Harwell to obtain a numerical solution of simultaneous partial differential equations of diffusion kinetics (see Eq. 7.1). In this procedure, the changes in the number of reactant species in concentric shells (spherical or cylindrical) by diffusion and reaction are calculated by a march of steps method. A very similar procedure has been adopted by Pimblott and La Verne (1990 La Verne and Pimblott, 1991). Later, Pimblott et al. (1996) analyzed carefully the relationship between the electron scavenging yield and the time dependence of eh yield through the Laplace transform, an idea first suggested by Balkas et al. (1970). These authors corrected for the artifactual effects of the experiments on eh decay and took into account the more recent data of Chernovitz and Jonah (1988). Their analysis raises the yield of eh at 100 ps to 4.8, in conformity with the value of Sumiyoshi et al. (1985). They also conclude that the time dependence of the eh yield and the yield of electron scavenging conform to each other through Laplace transform, but that neither is predicted correctly by the diffusion-kinetic model of water radiolysis. [Pg.219]

The Debye-Huckel theory was developed to extend the capacitor model and is based on a simplified solution of the Poisson equation. It assumes that the double layer is really a diffuse cloud in which the potential is not a discontinuous function. Again, the interest is in deriving an expression for the electrical potential function. This model states that there is an exponential relationship between the charge and the potential. The distribution of the potential is ... [Pg.625]

There have been few studies reported in the literature in the area of multi-component adsorption and desorption rate modeling (1, 2,3., 4,5. These have generally employed simplified modeling approaches, and the model predictions have provided qualitative comparisons to the experimental data. The purpose of this study is to develop a comprehensive model for multi-component adsorption kinetics based on the following mechanistic process (1) film diffusion of each species from the fluid phase to the solid surface (2) adsorption on the surface from the solute mixture and (3) diffusion of the individual solute species into the interior of the particle. The model is general in that diffusion rates in both fluid and solid phases are considered, and no restrictions are made regarding adsorption equilibrium relationships. However, diffusional flows due to solute-solute interactions are assumed to be zero in both fluid and solid phases. [Pg.27]

The development of mass transfer models require knowledge of three properties the diffusion coefficient of the solute, the viscosity of the SCF, and the density of the SCF phase. These properties can be used to correlate mass transfer coefficients. At 35 C and pressures lower than the critical pressure (72.83 atm for CO2) we use the diffusivity interpolated from literature diffusivity data (2,3). However, a linear relationship between log Dv and p at constant temperature has been presented by several researchers U>5) who correlated diffusivities in supercritical fluids. For pressures higher than the critical, we determined an analytical relationship using the diffusivity data obtained for the C02 naphthalene system by lomtev and Tsekhanskaya (6), at 35 C. [Pg.382]

The section begins with the random walk, a useful model from statistical physics that provides insight into the kinetics of molecular diffusion. From this starting point, the fundamental relationship between diffusive flux and solute concentration. Pick s law, is described and used to develop general mass-conservation equations. These conservation equations are essential for analysis of rates of solute transport in tissues. [Pg.23]

As the result, the basic electrochemical relationships binding the rate of the electrochemical reaction with the electrode potential are insufficient for the complete description of the cell processes. Instead, rather sophisticated macro-kinetic models have been developed. On the other hand, all models require quantitative data on several kinetic parameters. In the simplest case, it is enough to know the rate constant of the charge transfer step, or exchange current (EC), and diffusion coefficients (DC) in solid phase and electrolyte solution, assuming that both EC and DC depend on concentration. [Pg.34]


See other pages where Solution-diffusion model relationships development is mentioned: [Pg.234]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.835]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.2898]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.711]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.1014]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.188]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.7 ]




SEARCH



Developer diffusion

Developer solutions

Diffusion solutes

Diffusion solutions

Model developed

Model solutions

Solutal model

Solute model

Solute relationships

Solution diffusion model

Solution relationships

© 2024 chempedia.info