Solution Concentration Molarity

AH natural waters are solutions, and the size of the world s oceans makes them the most abundant aqueous solution on the earth. Seawater is among the most concentrated of the planet s natural waters, and its concentration continues to gradually increase over time. Chemists and other scientists study the oceans and their interaction with aU aspects of the environment, and many concepts from chemistry are central to this research. 

The ocean is a liquid solution of many dissolved solids. 

8 Given two of the following, calculate the third moles of solute (or data from which it may he found), volume of solution, molarity. 

In working with liquids, volume is easier to measure than mass. Therefore, a solution concentration based on volume is usually more convenient to use than one based on mass. Molarity, M, is the moles of solute per liter of solution. The defining equation is 

If a solution contains 0.755 mole of sulfuric acid per liter, we identify it as 0.755 M H2SO4. In words, it is point seven-five-five molar sulfuric acid. In a calculation setup we would write 0.755 mol H2SO4/L.  

---

I See the Saunders Interactive General Chemistry CD-ROM, Screen 5-10, Solution Concentration — Molarity. 

A Figure 4.18 Outline of the procedure used to solve stoichiometry problems that involve measured (laboratory) units of mass, solution concentration (molarity), or volume. 

Solution Concentration Percentage by Mass Solution Concentration Molarity... 

Concentration. The basis unit of concentration in chemistry is the mole which is the amount of substance that contains as many entities, eg, atoms, molecules, ions, electrons, protons, etc, as there are atoms in 12 g of ie, Avogadro s number = 6.0221367 x 10. Solution concentrations are expressed on either a weight or volume basis. MolaUty is the concentration of a solution in terms of the number of moles of solute per kilogram of solvent. Molarity is the concentration of a solution in terms of the number of moles of solute per Hter of solution. 

For predic ting diffiisivities in binary polar or associating liquid systems at liign solute dilution, the method of Wilke and Chang " defined in Eq. (2-156) can be utilized. The Tyn and Cains equation (2-152) can be used to determine the molar volume of the solute at the normal boihng point. Errors average 20 percent, with occasional errors of 35 percent. The method is not considered to be accurate above a solute concentration of 5 mole percent. 

For expressing concentrations of reagents, the molar system is universally applicable, i.e. the number of moles of solute present in 1 L of solution. Concentrations may also be expressed in terms of normality if no ambiguity is likely to arise (see Appendix 17). 

It is more interesting to examine the behavior of theory with respect to solutions of moderate dilutions. The partial molar heats of solution of copper, silver, and gold in liquid tin have been measured51 at solute concentrations from 0.0005 to 0.02. A schematic... 

G.6 (a) A chemist prepares a solution by dissolving 4.690 g of NaNO, in enough water to make 500.0 mL of solution. What molar concentration of sodium nitrate should appear on the label (b) If the chemist mistakenly uses a 250.0-mL volumetric flask instead of the 500.0-mL flask in part (a), what molar concentration of sodium nitrate will the chemist actually prepare ... 

Calculate the molar concentration (molarity) of a solute from titration data (Toolbox L.2 and Example L.2). 

In the classical theory of conductivity of electrolyte solutions, independent ionic migration is assumed. However, in real solutions the mobilities Uj and molar conductivities Xj of the individual ions depend on the total solution concentration, a situation which, for instance, is reflected in Kohhausch s square-root law. The values of said quantities also depend on the identities of the other ions. All these observations point to an influence of ion-ion interaction on the migration of the ions in solution. 

In aqueous electrolyte solutions the molar conductivities of the electrolyte. A, and of individual ions, Xj, always increase with decreasing solute concentration [cf. Eq. (7.11) for solutions of weak electrolytes, and Eq. (7.14) for solutions of strong electrolytes]. In nonaqueous solutions even this rule fails, and in some cases maxima and minima appear in the plots of A vs. c (Eig. 8.1). This tendency becomes stronger in solvents with low permittivity. This anomalons behavior of the nonaqueous solutions can be explained in terms of the various equilibria for ionic association (ion pairs or triplets) and complex formation. It is for the same reason that concentration changes often cause a drastic change in transport numbers of individual ions, which in some cases even assume values less than zero or more than unity. 

FIGURE 8.1 Molar conductivities of AgNOj in pyridine as a function of solution concentration. 

Fig. 4.18 represents a countercurrent-flow, packed gas absorption column, in which the absorption of solute is accompanied by the evolution of heat. In order to treat the case of concentrated gas and liquid streams, in which the total flow rates of both gas and liquid vary throughout the column, the solute concentrations in the gas and liquid are defined in terms of mole ratio units and related to the molar flow rates of solute free gas and liquid respectively, as discussed previously in Sec. 3.3.2. By convention, the mass transfer rate equation is however expressed in terms of mole fraction units. In Fig. 4.18, Gm is the molar flow of solute free gas (kmol/m s), is the molar flow of solute free liquid (kmol/m s), where both and Gm remain constant throughout the column. Y is the mole ratio of solute in the gas phase (kmol of solute/kmol of solute free gas), X is the mole ratio of solute in the liquid phase (kmol of...

In aqueous solutions, concentrations are sometimes expressed in terms of normality (gram equivalents per liter), so that if C is concentration, then V = 103/C and a = 103 K/C. To calculate C, it is necessary to know the formula of the solute in solution. For example, a one molar solution of Fe2(S04)3 would contain 6 1CT3 equivalents cm-3. It is now clear as to why A is preferred. The derivation provided herein clearly brings out the fact that A is the measure of the electrolytic conductance of the ions which make up 1 g-equiv. of electrolyte of a particular concentration - thereby setting conductance measurements on a common basis. Sometimes the molar conductance am is preferred to the equivalent conductance this is the conductance of that volume of the electrolyte which contains one gram molecule (mole) of the ions taking part in the electrolysis and which is held between parallel electrodes 1 cm apart. 

---