Solution concentration, calculation

Calculate the number of moles of ZnCl2 per kilogram of water in each solution (the molality m). Calculate the volume V of solution containing 1 kg of water at each solute concentration. Plot V vs. m. Use program Mathead, QQLSQ, or TableCurve... 

One mol of each of the following is dissolved in water the final volume in each case is 1 0 L Identify the species that is present in greatest concentration in the respective solutions Detailed calculations are not necessary... 

Equation 9 states that the surface excess of solute, F, is proportional to the concentration of solute, C, multipHed by the rate of change of surface tension, with respect to solute concentration, d /dC. The concentration of a surfactant ia a G—L iaterface can be calculated from the linear segment of a plot of surface tension versus concentration and similarly for the concentration ia an L—L iaterface from a plot of iaterfacial teasioa. la typical appHcatioas, the approximate form of the Gibbs equatioa was employed to calculate the area occupied by a series of sulfosucciaic ester molecules at the air—water iaterface (8) and the energies of adsorption at the air-water iaterface for a series of commercial aonionic surfactants (9). 

The response of solute concentration in the raffinate to the sol-vent-to-feed ratio S /F can be calculated by Eqs. (15-26) and (15-27) for a constant number of transfer units based on the overall raffinate phase N r-... 

The values given in this table are only approximate, but they are adequate for process screening purposes with Eqs. (16-24) and (16-25). Rigorous calculations generally require that activity coefficients be accounted for. However, for the exchange between ions of the same valence at solution concentrations of 0.1 N or less, or between any ions at 0.01 N or less, the solution-phase activity coefficients prorated to unit valence will be similar enough that they can be omitted. 

If the cake is washed with solnte-free liquid, percent remaining is readily calculated by dividing the solute concentration in the hqnid remaining in the washed cake by the solute concentration in the liquid in the original feed. 

The sum expressed by equation (25) also lends itself to a digital solution and can be employed in an appropriate computer program to calculate actual peak profiles for different volumes of pure mobile phase that have been injected onto an equilibrated column. The values of (Xg) were calculated for a column having 500 theoretical plates and for sample volumes of 20, 50, 100 and 200 plate volumes, respectively. The curves relating solute concentration (Xe) to plate volumes of mobile phase passed through the column are shown in Figure 17. 

The first, and simplest, step in predicting crystallizer performance is the calculation of crystal yield. This can easily be estimated from knowledge of solution concentration and equilibrium conditions permitting calculation of the overall mass balance... 

The hydrogen ion concentration of the hydrolysed solution is calculated in the following manner ... 

Sodium chloride has a relative molecular mass of 58.44. A 0.1000M solution is prepared by weighing out 2.922 g of the pure dry salt (see Section 10.74) and dissolving it in 500 mL of water in a graduated flask. Alternatively about 2.9 g of the pure salt is accurately weighed out, dissolved in 500 mL of water in a graduated flask and the molar concentration calculated from the weight of sodium chloride employed. 

Calculate the hydroxide ion concentration from the solute concentration. 

In this example, the attributes associated with water and solutions containing various concentrations of a polar solute are calculated and transformed into effective temperatures. The comparisons between these two values are reckoned to be a model of the depression in the freezing point of the system. The... 

Even in relatively concentrated solutions, the mole fraction of water remains close to 1.00. At a solute concentration of 0.50 M, for example, H2 O = 0.99, only 1% different from 1.00. Equilibrium calculations are seldom accurate to better than 5%, so this small deviation from 1.00 can be neglected. Consequently, we treat solvent water just like a pure substance its concentration is essentially invariant, so it is omitted from the equilibrium constant expression. 

Several boundary conditions have been used to prescribe the outer limit of an individual rhizosphere, (/ = / /,). For low root densities, it has been assumed that each rhizosphere extends over an infinite volume of. soil in the model //, is. set sufficiently large that the soil concentration at r, is never altered by the activity in the rhizosphere. The majority of models assume that the outer limit is approximated by a fixed value that is calculated as a function of the maximum root density found in the simulation, under the assumption that the roots are uniformly distributed in the soil volume. Each root can then extract nutrients only from this finite. soil cylinder. Hoffland (31) recognized that the outer limit would vary as more roots were formed within the simulated soil volume and periodically recalculated / /, from the current root density. This recalculation thus resulted in existing roots having a reduced //,. New roots were assumed to be formed in soil with an initial solute concentration equal to the average concentration present in the cylindrical shells stripped away from the existing roots. The effective boundary equation for all such assumptions is the same ... 

A problem with the solution of initial-value differential equations is that they always have to be solved iteratively from the defined initial conditions. Each time a parameter value is changed, the solution has to be recalculated from scratch. When simulations involve uptake by root systems with different root orders and hence many different root radii, the calculations become prohibitive. An alternative approach is to try to solve the equations analytically, allowing the calculation of uptake at any time directly. This has proved difficult becau.se of the nonlinearity in the boundary condition, where the uptake depends on the solute concentration at the root-soil interface. Another approach is to seek relevant model simplifications that allow approximate analytical solutions to be obtained. 

In aqueous solutions, concentrations are sometimes expressed in terms of normality (gram equivalents per liter), so that if C is concentration, then V = 103/C and a = 103 K/C. To calculate C, it is necessary to know the formula of the solute in solution. For example, a one molar solution of Fe2(S04)3 would contain 6 1CT3 equivalents cm-3. It is now clear as to why A is preferred. The derivation provided herein clearly brings out the fact that A is the measure of the electrolytic conductance of the ions which make up 1 g-equiv. of electrolyte of a particular concentration - thereby setting conductance measurements on a common basis. Sometimes the molar conductance am is preferred to the equivalent conductance this is the conductance of that volume of the electrolyte which contains one gram molecule (mole) of the ions taking part in the electrolysis and which is held between parallel electrodes 1 cm apart. 

In PAMPA measurements each well is usually a one-point-in-time (single-timepoint) sample. By contrast, in the conventional multitimepoint Caco-2 assay, the acceptor solution is frequently replaced with fresh buffer solution so that the solution in contact with the membrane contains no more than a few percent of the total sample concentration at any time. This condition can be called a physically maintained sink. Under pseudo-steady state (when a practically linear solute concentration gradient is established in the membrane phase see Chapter 2), lipophilic molecules will distribute into the cell monolayer in accordance with the effective membrane-buffer partition coefficient, even when the acceptor solution contains nearly zero sample concentration (due to the physical sink). If the physical sink is maintained indefinitely, then eventually, all of the sample will be depleted from both the donor and membrane compartments, as the flux approaches zero (Chapter 2). In conventional Caco-2 data analysis, a very simple equation [Eq. (7.10) or (7.11)] is used to calculate the permeability coefficient. But when combinatorial (i.e., lipophilic) compounds are screened, this equation is often invalid, since a considerable portion of the molecules partitions into the membrane phase during the multitimepoint measurements. 

The terms in Eq. (6) include the gravitational constant, g, the tube radius, R, the fluid viscosity, p, the solute concentration in the donor phase, C0, and the penetration depth, The density difference between the solution and solvent (ps - p0) is critical to the calculation of a. Thus, this method is dependent upon accurate measurement of density values and close temperature control, particularly when C0 represents a dilute solution. This method has been shown to be sensitive to different diffusion coefficients for various ionic species of citrate and phosphate [5], The variability of this method in terms of the coefficient of variation ranged from 19% for glycine to 2.9% for ortho-aminobenzoic acid. 

---