Solute-solvent interaction, acid

Solute-solvent interactions in aqueous solutions of pyrimidine nucleic acid bases 99PAC1286. 

H-bonding is an important, but not the sole, interatomic interaction. Thus, total energy is usually calculated as the sum of steric, electrostatic, H-bonding and other components of interatomic interactions. A similar situation holds with QSAR studies of any property (activity) where H-bond parameters are used in combination with other descriptors. For example, five molecular descriptors are applied in the solvation equation of Kamlet-Taft-Abraham excess of molecular refraction (Rj), which models dispersion force interactions arising from the polarizability of n- and n-electrons the solute polarity/polarizability (ir ) due to solute-solvent interactions between bond dipoles and induced dipoles overall or summation H-bond acidity (2a ) overall or summation H-bond basicity (2(3 ) and McGowan volume (VJ [53] ... 

Since around 1950, in studies of solvent effects for organic reactions, empirical solvent parameters have been used these parameters represent the capabilities of solvents for the solute-solvent interactions (especially Lewis acid-base interactions). Though the solute-solvent interactions should depend on the solute as well as on the solvent, the empirical solvent parameters are considered to be irrelevant to solutes in other words, the use of only these parameters enables us to evaluate the solvation energies. Strictly... 

As has been suggested in the previous section, explanations of solvent effects on the basis of the macroscopic physical properties of the solvent are not very successful. The alternative approach is to make use of the microscopic or chemical properties of the solvent and to consider the detailed interaction of solvent molecules with their own kind and with solute molecules. If a configuration in which one or more solvent molecules interacts with a solute molecule has a particularly low free energy, it is feasible to describe at least that part of the solute-solvent interaction as the formation of a molecular complex and to speak of an equilibrium between solvated and non-solvated molecules. Such a stabilization of a particular solute by solvation will shift any equilibrium involving that solute. For example, in the case of formation of carbonium ions from triphenylcarbinol, the equilibrium is shifted in favor of the carbonium ion by an acidic solvent that reacts with hydroxide ion and with water. The carbonium ion concentration in sulfuric acid is greater than it is in methanol-... 

The parameters a and p indicate the capacity of a solvent to donate or accept a hydrogen bond from a solute, i.e., the solvent s hydrogen bond acidity or basicity. % is intended to reflect van der Waals-type solute-solvent interactions (dipolar, dispersion, exchange-repulsion, etc.). Equation (43) was subsequently expanded to include a term representing the need to create a cavity for the solute (and thus to interrupt solvent-solvent interactions).188 For this purpose was used the Hildebrand solubility parameter, 5, which is defined as the square root of the solvent s energy of vaporization per unit volume.189 Thus Eq. (43) becomes,190... 

According to the hard and soft acids and bases (HSAB) concept, hard acids tend to interact strongly with hard bases, while soft acids tend to interact strongly with soft bases. The HSAB concept applies also to solute-solvent interactions. Figure 2.5 shows the polarographic half-wave potentials of metal ions in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP) and N-methyl-2-thiopyrrolidinone (NMTP) [13]. Here, we can compare the half-wave potentials in the two solvents, because they are referred to the half-wave potential of the bis(biphenyl)chromium(l)/(0) couple,... 

When considering bipolar solutes (e.g., aniline, 1-hexanol, phenol, hexanoic acid), we can see that depending on the relative magnitudes of the solvent s at and /3, values, solute solvent interactions may become quite attractive. For example, for aniline, for which j6 trichloromethane is still the most favorable solvent, whereas for phenol (a, > j6,), diethylether wins over the others. Finally, due to the lack of polar interactions in hexane, bipolar solutes partition rather poorly from water into such apolar solvents (Table 7.1). 

The oxidation of meta- and para-substituted anilines with imidazolium fluorochro-mate (IFC)18 and nicotinium dichromate (NDC),19 in several organic solvents, in the presence of p-toluenesulfonic acid (TsOH) is first order in the oxidant and TsOH and is zero order with respect to substrate. A correlation of rate data in different solvents with Kamlet-Taft solvatochromic parameters suggests that the specific solute-solvent interactions play a major role in governing the reactivity, and the observed solvent effects have been explained on the basis of solute-solvent complexation. The oxidation rates with NDC exhibited negative reaction constants, while the oxidation with IFC did not correlate well with any linear free energy relationships. 

The validity of the two approaches sketched above has been quite amply tested against the ability of reproducing various molecular properties of hydrogen-bonded systems (see elsewhere in this book) including vibrational spectroscopies [11,54-56], For example, in Figure 2.11 calculated versus experimental IR spectra of gallic acid in water solution are reported for different levels of treatment of the specific solute-solvent interaction [54],... 

---