Solubility regular solution theory

If the mutual solubilities of the solvents A and B are small, and the systems are dilute in C, the ratio ni can be estimated from the activity coefficients at infinite dilution. The infinite dilution activity coefficients of many organic systems have been correlated in terms of stmctural contributions (24), a method recommended by others (5). In the more general case of nondilute systems where there is significant mutual solubiUty between the two solvents, regular solution theory must be appHed. Several methods of correlation and prediction have been reviewed (23). The universal quasichemical (UNIQUAC) equation has been recommended (25), which uses binary parameters to predict multicomponent equihbria (see Eengineering, chemical DATA correlation). 

We encountered the quantity AE ap/V in Eq. (8-35) it is the cohesive energy density. The square root of this quantity plays an important role in regular solution theory, and Hildebrand named it the solubility parameter, 8. 

Strictly speaking Eq. (8-51) should be applied only to reacting systems whose molecular properties are consistent with the assumptions of regular solution theory. This essentially restricts the approach to the reactions of nonpolar species in nonpolar solvents. Even in these systems, which we recall do not exhibit a marked solvent dependence, correlations with tend to be poor. - pp Nevertheless, the solubility parameter and its partitioning into dispersion, polar, and H-bonding components provide some insight into solvent behavior that is different from the information given by other properties such as those in Tables 8-2 and 8-3. 

The solubility parameter 5 of a pure solvent defined initially by Hildebrand and Scott based on a thermodynamic model of regular solution theory is given by Equation 4.4 [13] ... 

Fig. 4. 23 Application of the regular solution theory for correlation of distribution constants for ZnA2 and CuA2 with solvent properties (solubility parameters) the numbers refer to the solvents listed in Table 4.10. (From Ref. 22.)...

The solubility parameter is therefore a measure of the energy density holding the molecules in the liquid state. Note that regular solution theory can only predict positive AH. Thus, with this approach, prediction of solubility involves matching the solute and solvent solubility parameters as closely as possible to minimize AH. As a very rough mle of thumb 61 — 62 must be less than 2 (f/cm3)1 /2 for solubility. 

Ruelle, R, M. Buchmann, H. Nam-Tran, andU.W. Kesselring. 1992. The mobile order theory versus UNIFAC and regular solution theory-derived models for predicting the solubility of solid substdftbasn. Res.9 788-791. 

A better estimate of all attractive forces surrounding a molecule was found in the use of the solubility parameter [32,33], Hancock et al. [34] has reviewed the use of solubility parameters in pharmaceutical dosage form design. The solubility parameter is used as a measure ofthe internal pressures ofthe solvent and solute in nonideal solutions. Cosolvents that are more polar have larger solubility parameters. The square root ofthe cohesive energy density, that is, the square root of the energy of vaporization per unit volume of substance, is known as the solubility parameter and was developed from Hildebrand s Regular Solution Theory in the Scatchard-Hildebrand... 

Other attempts at characterizing the deviation from ideal solubility theory have been made. Anderson et al. [50] showed that solubilities that could not be rationalized from the regular solution theory could be rationalized by assuming the formation of speciLc solute-solvent complexes. Yalkowsky et al. [51,52] showed that the deviation from the ideal solubility equation could be expressed in terms of interfacial tension and surface area. In equation form,... 

When gas solubility data are lacking or are unavailable at the desired temperature, they can be estimated using available models. The method of Prausnitz and Shair (1961), which is based on regular solution theory and thus has the limitations of that theory. The applicability of regular solution theory is covered in detail by Hildebrand et al. (1970). A more recent model, now widely used, is UNIFAC, which is based on structural contributions of the solute and solvent molecular species. This model is described by Fredenslund et al. (1977) and extensive tabulations of equilibrium data, based on UNIFAC, have been published by Hwang et al. (1992) for aqueous systems where the solute concentrations are low and the solutions depart markedly from thermodynamic equilibrium. 

There already exists a substantial literature devoted to the estimation of various material properties with the help of additive structual increments (Reid et. al, 1987, Van Krevelen, 1990). The regular solution theory in combination with additive structural increments has a wide application for estimating the relative solubilities of organic substances in polymers and the solubility of polymers in various solvents (Barton, 1983) and will be described later in this chapter. When estimating partition coefficient values, one is quickly confronted with this method s application limits, particularly with polar and non-polar structures, for example the partitioning of substances between polyolefins and alcohol (Baner and Piringer, 1991). 

According to the regular solution theory, polymers are as a rule soluble in solvents if their solubility parameters are similar to those of the corresponding solvent. The upper limit for good solubility is defined to he a difference (AS) of 6 units between solubility parameters ... 

Regular solution theory, the solubility parameter, and the three-dimensional solubility parameters are commonly used in the paints and coatings industry to predict the miscibility of pigments and solvents in polymers. In some applications quantitative predictions have been obtained. Generally, however, the results are only qualitative since entropic effects are not considered, and it is clear that entropic effects are extremely important in polymer solutions. Because of their limited usefulness, a method using solubility parameters is not given in this Handbook. Nevertheless, this approach is still of some use since solubility parameters are reported for a number of groups that are not treated by the more sophisticated models. 

Additional approaches to understand and predict solubilities in mixed solvents are based on estimation of the activity coefficient, logy, in Eq. (1). Martin, Chertkoff, and Restaino investigated the use of regular solution theory, as developed by Hildebrand and Scott, to predict the solubilities of organic solutes in various solvent mixtures ... 

However, when the solute or either of the pure solvents is polar, the regular solution theory could no longer provide quantitative agreement regarding the solubility of a solid solute in a mixed solvent (Acree, 1984 Walas, 1985). 

Azizian, S. Pour, A. H. Solubility of 2-naphthol in organic nonelectrolyte solvents. Comparison of observed versus predicted values based upon mobile order and regular solution theories./. Chem. Res.-S. 2003, 7, 402-404. 

Contreras Claramonte MD, Parera Vialard A, Girela Vilchez F. An application of regular solution theory in the study of the solubility of naproxen in some solvents used in topical preparations. Int J Pharm 1993 94 23-30. 

A thermodynamic method, more fitting to this chapter, has been proposed by Nauman et al. They claim a process for the separation of a physically mixed solid polymers by selective dissolution. They rely on the different polymer solubility characteristics. Tables of this property have been reported and are based on regular solution theory and Hildebrand solubility parameters. The core of the Nauman invention is to find suitable solvents to dissolve particular polymers under defined temperature and pressure conditions. A mixture of polymers is first added to one solvent, at a given temperature, in order to dissolve a particular polymer. The remaining polymer mixture is then treated at a higher temperature with the same solvent or with a different solvent. For clarity, two examples are taken from the patent."... 

Regular solution theory characterises nonpolar solvents in terms of solubility parameter, 6y which is defined as... 

For the prediction of solubility of polar solutes in polar solvents, the regular solution theory, Eq. (17), has been modified to take into account the additional interactions between the solvent and the solute. Some of these modified methods are discussed by Prausnitz et al. (16). 

Other molecular properties have been also proposed to model the hydrophobic interactions. The parachor, which is related to the surface tension of a compound (139, 140) represents mainly the intermolecular interactions in a liquid. The Hildebrand-Scott solubility parameter, 6, (141) is related to intermolecular van der Waals forces and the closely related molar attraction constant, F, is obtained by multiplying 6 by the molar volume (142). The partition coefficient between two solvents can be obtained from the solubility parameters and the molar volumes of the solute and the solvents (193). This relationship is based on regular solution theory (194) and the assumption that the partial molar volumes of the solute is not different from its molar volume. Recently this has been criticized and a new derivation was proposed (195) in which the partial molar volumes are taken into account. The molar refractivity, MR, is related to dispersion forces and can be obtained as a sum of the partial molar refractivi-ties assigned to atoms and bonds (140, 143). These parameters have been compared (144) to establish their relative applicability to correlations with biological activity. The conclusion was that logP and molecular refractivity were the best parameters. Parameters obtained from high pressure liquid chromatography (144,... 

A number of methods based on regular solution theory also are available. Only pure-component parameters are needed to make estimates, so they may be applied when UNIFAC group-interaction parameters are not available. The Hansen solubility parameter model divides the Hildebrand solubility parameter into three parts to obtain parameters 8d, 5p, and 5 accounting for nonpolar (dispersion), polar, and hydrogenbonding effects [Hansen,/. Paint Technot, 39, pp. 104-117 (1967)]) An activity coefficient may be estimated by using an equation of the form... 

The method of DiPaola-Baranyi and Guillet is an extension of the work of Bristow and Watson [21] who calculated solubility parameters for a series of network polymers from swelling equilibria. The basis is that the solubility parameters of solvent, 61, and polymer, 2) are introduced in the form of Regular Solution theory [19] to account for enthalpic effects ... 

In the above considerations, the hydrophobic portions of both the membrane polymer and the small molecules that enter the membrane are expected to interact in the hydrophobic microphases in the membrane. It therefore becomes useful to find a numerical measure of the miscibility of these hydrophobic portions of molecules. In the case of complete molecules, both small and polymeric, the solubility parameter concept has been useful in the past. This concept is related to the enthalpy change which occurs on mixing in regular solution theory as developed by Hildebrand and coworkers (10) and as used for polymer solution theory by Flory (11). The Hildebrand solubility parameter is a measure of the attraction between molecules of the same kind, including dispersion forces, polar forces, and hydrogen bonding... 

In the liquid phase, the simplest option is an ideal liquid, with an activity coefficient equal to 1.0. That choice leads to Raoult s law, which may suffice for similar chemicals. Other models include regular solution theory using solubility parameters (although not in Aspen Plus), NRTL, Electrolyte NRTL, UNIFAC, UNIQUAC, Van Laar, and Wilson. Characteristics of the models are ... 

---