Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solubility prediction reagents

Fig. 15.17 Selected examples of the distribution of predicted solubilities for diversity reagents within a 2400-member library built around a common core. Solubilities were calculated using the simulations Plus QMPRPIus solubility prediction tools and expressed in mg mL . Significant number of aqueous solubility predictions below 10 lg mL was considered sufficient criteria for deselection of that diversity reagent. Fig. 15.17 Selected examples of the distribution of predicted solubilities for diversity reagents within a 2400-member library built around a common core. Solubilities were calculated using the simulations Plus QMPRPIus solubility prediction tools and expressed in mg mL . Significant number of aqueous solubility predictions below 10 lg mL was considered sufficient criteria for deselection of that diversity reagent.
A similar prediction can be made for the concentration distribution of reagents for a diffusion limited reaction occurring at the phase boundary. The concentration of the reactants decreases around the phase boundary, as this is the site where they are consumed. In Figure 2.14, it is assumed that the reactant A has about one tenth of the solubility in phase 2 compared to phase 1, thus in most cases some of reactant A will diffuse across the phase boundary into this phase. As in phase 1, the concentration distribution will not be equal throughout the phase, but it will be lower in proximity to the phase boundary. If the reaction is very fast, reactant A will be consumed at the phase boundary and will therefore not enter phase 2. [Pg.54]

As mentioned above, the statistically predicted amount of monofunctionalized product can only be obtained if both reactants are thoroughly mixed. If the difunctional reagent is poorly soluble under the reaction conditions chosen, its concentration might be lower than that of the monofunctional reagent. This can lead to large... [Pg.340]

The first reported preparation of cross-linked enzyme crystals was by Quiocho and Richards in 1964 [1], They prepared crystals of carboxypeptidase-A and cross-linked them with glutaraldehyde. The material they prepared retained only about 5% of the activity of the soluble enzyme and showed a measurable increase in mechanical stability. The authors quite correctly predicted that cross-linked enzyme crystals, particularly ones of small size where the diffusion problem is not serious, may be useful as reagents which can be removed by sedimentation and filtration. Two years later the same authors reported a more detailed study of the enzymic behavior of CLCs of carboxypeptidase-A [2], In this study they reported that only the lysine residues in the protein were modified by the glutaraldehyde cross-linking. The CLCs were packed in a column for a flow-through assay and maintained activity after many uses over a period of 3 months. [Pg.210]

It is interesting to compare these values and to predict what happens if, to a solution which contains the complex ion, a reagent is added which, under normal circumstances, would form a precipitate with the central ion. It is obvious that the higher the value of the instability constant, the higher the concentration of free central ion (metal ion) in the solution, and therefore the more probable it is that the product of ion concentrations in the solution will exceed the value of the solubility product of the precipitate and hence the precipitate... [Pg.92]

One can easily summarize the requirements that should be fulfilled before the titanium-based ceramic materials can be obtained through an aqueous solution synthesis method. First, the precursor compound should possess good solubility in water, and preferably it should be stable over a wide pH range. In ideal case such compound should be a weighing form for titanium however, from the practical considerations it is sufficient to have a stock solution stable for a reasonably long period of time. Second, the reagent should be non-toxic, relatively cheap and its impact on the environment should be small. Its composition and chemistry should be simple and the reactions with other cations that will be introduced to the system must be well-predictable. The tendency to form precipitates with many cations, like in the case of oxalate ions, must be avoided. Finally, from an industrial point of view, the overall process should be cost effective and environmentally benign. [Pg.631]

As regards the redox potential, it is quite predictable that iron in wine is not totally in ion form. Part of the iron is involved in soluble complexes with organic acids, especially citric acid. Ferric iron is much more likely to form complexes than ferrous iron. Ferric and ferrous iron, expressed as Fe and Fe , constitute total iron, in both ions and complexes, i.e. non-reactive forms. A total iron assay therefore requires the complete destruction of these complexes by acidification. The use of potassium thiocyanate, a specific reagent for ferric... [Pg.96]

One should remember that the formula is used only to describe how fast after supersaturation is achieved one can expect precipitation, and not whether it will happen. The solubility product describes the supersaturated system thermod5mamically and predicts that precipitation will take place. The supersaturation ratio describes the supersaturated system kinetically by prediction of when it will take place. Also one should remember the role of impurities in nucleation. In the original determination of the critical supersaturation ratio of barium sulfate, solvent and reagents of the lower purity were used, giving a value of 21 instead of 32. [Pg.94]

When reagent completely reacts and solute solubility in the membrane and internal phases Is Inconsequential, the globule capacity is 88.88. Table II compares this reaction-only number to the total capacity including solute solubility. How closely condition 27 is satisfied will determine the size of the deviations In these two numbers. When solubility does contribute, predictions of extractor performance based on the pseudosteady-state advancing front approach will tend to be conservative. This underprediction of extraction performance can be removed by including additional terms in the perturbation solution described by Ho et al. ( ). A simple alternate procedure is described next. [Pg.73]

Three methods which do not require solution of the nonlinear partial differential equation are presented for estimating extractor performance. The choice of method depends on the value of the dimensionless outlet solute concentration, oj. If (oj + 1)/oJ is close to 1, the reaction is effectively irreversible and the pseudosteady-state solution of the advancing front model satisfactorily predicts performance after normalization to include solute solubility in the globule. If (oj + 1)/oJ is not close to 1, the advancing front results will still apply, provided that the amount of solute extracted by reaction is small and membrane solubility controls. When oj is small enough so that (oj + 1) is close to 1, then the reversible reaction model can be reduced to a linear equation with an analytical solution. Otherwise, for oj values when neither (oj + 1) nor (oj + 1)/o is nearly 1, a reasonable first approximation is made by adjusting the actual concentration of internal reagent to an effective concentration which equals the amount consumed to reach equilibrium. [Pg.78]

Chemical Tests. The ignition test should indicate that this compound is an aliphatic species. Does your result confirm this fact Perform the ceric nitrate test to demonstrate the presence of the —OH group and the Lucas test to demonstrate that a secondary alcohol has been prepared. If you were required to prepare a solid derivative of this alcohol, which one would you select It may be of interest to determine the solubility of this product in water, ether, concentrated sulfuric, and 85% phosphoric acids. Do your results agree with what you would predict What test(s) would you perform to establish that one of the starting reagents was an aldehyde ... [Pg.288]


See other pages where Solubility prediction reagents is mentioned: [Pg.411]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.1517]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.633]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.673]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.141]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.126 ]




SEARCH



Solubility predicting

Solubility prediction

© 2024 chempedia.info