Solid-state zone theory

From the solid-state zone theory point of view, solid electrolytes are dielectrics with the wide forbidden zone E = 4 - 6 eV [23]. In contrast from the ordinary dielectrics, which have a fixed Fermi level Ep in the middle of the forbidden zone, the position of the Fermi level for the solid electrolytes depends on the thermodynamical oxygen potential on crystalUne boundaries. This is due to the fact that the solid electrolytes are not just dielectrics, but rather crystaUine phases with ionic conductivity, stipulated by the high density of oxygen vacancies (% = lO - 10 m ), in the anion sublattice of the electrolyte. 

Both correlations (1.33) and (1.34) point out that the electrons play an important role in the electrophysics of solid electrolytes. They also point out the singleness of purpose of describing the properties of electrolytes within the solid-state zone theory. 

The quantity x is a dimensionless quantity which is conventionally restricted to a range of —-ir < x < tt, a central Brillouin zone. For the case yj = 0 (i.e., S a pure translation), x corresponds to a normalized quasimomentum for a system with one-dimensional translational periodicity (i.e., x s kh, where k is the traditional wavevector from Bloch s theorem in solid-state band-structure theory). In the previous analysis of helical symmetry, with H the lattice vector in the graphene sheet defining the helical symmetry generator, X in the graphene model corresponds similarly to the product x = k-H where k is the two-dimensional quasimomentum vector of graphene. 

The theory of band structures belongs to the world of solid state physicists, who like to think in terms of collective properties, band dispersions, Brillouin zones and reciprocal space [9,10]. This is not the favorite language of a chemist, who prefers to think in terms of molecular orbitals and bonds. Hoffmann gives an excellent and highly instructive comparison of the physical and chemical pictures of bonding [6], In this appendix we try to use as much as possible the chemical language of molecular orbitals. Before talking about metals we recall a few concepts from molecular orbital theory. 

On the theoretical side cur problem is just as great. Quite apart from the purely mathematical difficulties involved there are principles which are lacking. There are many unjustifiable assumptions made m the thermodynamic arguments, on which any estimation of defect concentration is inevitably based. Over and above this there is only a very approximate treatment of the quantum mechanics of the perfect solid state available the zone theory and the method of atomic orbitals give widely different solutions to the same problem. The most significant theoretical advance here has come from James, and more particularly Slater, who has provided a useful theorem on which to base study of the defect state. 

This view runs into difficulties that have only recently been completely resolved. The principal one is that the pseudopotential form factor happens to be very small for this particular diffraction. In Fig. 18-4 is sketched the pseudopotential form factor for silicon obtained from the Solid State Table the form factor that gives the [220] diffraction is indicated. Because it lies so close to the crossing, it is small and the diffraction is not expected to be strong. Heine and Jones (1969) noted, however, that a second-order diffraction can take an electron across the Jones Zone this could be a virtual diffraction by a lattice wave number of [lll]27j/a billowed by a virtual diffraction by [llT]27c/a. (Virtual diffraction is an expression used to describe terms in perturbation theory it can be helpful but is not essential to the analysis here.) This second-order diffraction would involve the large matrix elements associated with the [11 l]27c/a lattice wave number indicated in Fig. 18-4, and Heine and Jones correctly indicated that these are the dominant matrix elements. 

Fig. 9 Changes in the crack initiation times and crack depths in an epoxy resin as a function of the amplitude of the imposed cyclic displacement, a Number of cycles to the initiation of the primary cracks at the edge of the contact zone, b Measured depths of the primary cracks at various number of cycles and displacement amplitudes. Circles 103 cycles, solid diamonds 5 x 103 cycles, squares 5 x 104 cycles, c Calculated values of the maximum tensile stress at the edge of the contact using Hamilton (gross slip condition) or Mindlin—Cattaneo (partial slip condition) theories. The two curves correspond to calculations using the initial (/x = 1.0) and the steady-state (/x = 1.5) values of the coefficient of friction. PSR Partial slip regime, MR mixed regime, GSR gross slip regime...

In the absence of a more completely characterized model for the reaction interface, it is often assumed (implicitly) that the transition state theory is applicable. This assumption may have hampered the development of a better model. Two areas which show potential for refinement of the theory are detailed textural studies, where possible, of reaction zones and spectroscopic studies of electron energy distributions during reactions in solids [41]. 

---