Slip systems defined

The critical resolved shear stress, Terss, is the minimum shear stress required to initiate slip for a particular slip system defined when a = 0/. 

Because of chain inextensibility, the shear rate of any slip system is not dependent on the normal-stress component in the chain direction (Parks and Ahzi 1990). This renders the crystalline lamellae rigid in the chain direction. To cope with this problem operationally, and to prevent global locking-up of deformation, a special modification is introduced to truncate the stress tensor in the chain direction c. Thus, we denote by S° this modification of the deviatoric Cauchy stress tensor S in the crystalline lamella to have a zero normal component in the chain direction, i.e., by requiring that 5 c,c = 0, where c,- and c,- are components of the c vector (Lee et al. 1993a). The resolved shear stress in the slip system a can then be expressed as r = where R is the symmetrical traceless Schmid tensor of stress resolution associated with the slip system a. The components of the symmetrical part of the Schmid tensor / , can be defined as = Ksfw" + fs ), where if and nj are the unit-vector components of the slip direction and the slip-plane normal of the given slip system a, respectively. 

The authors [6] suggest the term shearability , Sm, for the maximum shear strain that a homogeneous crystal can withstand. It is defined by Sm = argmax o-(s), where a(s), is the resolved shear stress and s is the engineering shear strain in a specified slip system. The relaxed shear stress, (7 in Table 4.2 is normalized by Gr. In this table, experimental and calculated values of the relaxed shear vales of Gr are given. For details on these calculations, refer to the work of Ogata et al. [6]. 

To generalize this situation it is necessary to define an angle u between the axis of rotation for the slip system of interest and an axis lying in the surface being investigated and normal to the sliding direction on that surface, say, XY. 

So far we have compared the static friction with the stick-slip transition. In both cases the system has to choose between the states of rest and motion, depending on which one is more favorable to the energy minimization. On the other hand, the differences between the two processes deserve a discussion, too. In stick-slip, when the moving surface slides in an average velocity V, there is a characteristic time, t =d.Ql V, that defines how long the two surfaces can... 

The heat transfer across the vapor layer and the temperature distribution in the solid, liquid, and vapor phases are shown in Fig. 13. In the subcooled impact, especially for a droplet of water, which has a larger latent heat, it has been reported that the thickness of the vapor layer can be very small and in some cases, the transient direct contact of the liquid and the solid surface may occur (Chen and Hsu, 1995). When the length scale of the vapor gap is comparable with the free path of the gas molecules, the kinetic slip treatment of the boundary condition needs to be undertaken to modify the continuum system. Consider the Knudsen number defined as the ratio of the average mean free path of the vapor to the thickness of the vapor layer ... 

In most problems involving boundary conditions, the boundary is assigned a specific empirical or deterministic behavior, such as the no-slip case or an empirically determined slip value. The condition is defined based on an averaged value that assumes a mean flow profile. This is convenient and simple for a macroscopic system, where random fluctuations in the interfacial properties are small enough so as to produce little noise in the system. However, random fluctuations in the interfacial conditions of microscopic systems may not be so simple to average out, due to the size of the fluctuations with respect to the size of the signal itself. To address this problem, we consider the use of stochastic boundary conditions that account for random fluctuations and focus on the statistical variability of the system. Also, this may allow for better predictions of interfacial properties and boundary conditions. 

Define the slip velocity Vs as up — u where u — U/a. In equilibrium conditions, Um is constant throughout the system, indicating that (au + apup) or (up — aVs) is constant. 

---