Six sigma measurement

To combat a cycle of Blame the System mentality, a constant active search for defects in the system, as Six Sigma techniques stress, is necessary. The objective is not to change the system but to find and fix the defects or errors in the current system (How to Effectively Assess and Improve your Safety and Health Program through Safety and Health Evaluation, n.d. Six Sigma Measure Phase, Data Collection Plan and Data Collection, n.d.). 

Six Sigma Measure Phase, Data Collection Plan and Data Collection, n.d.)... 

Six Sigma Measure Phase, Data Collection Plan and Data Collection, (n.d.). tutorialspoint, Permission to Reprint/ Modify/Adapt for Use. Retrieved from http //www.mtorialspoint.com/six sigma/index.htm. 

Safety Culture Snapshot User Guide. (2010). Department of Labor, TE TARI MAHI, Reprinted with Permission. Six Sigma Measure Phase, Data Collection Plan and Data Collection, (n.d.). tutorialspoint,. Permission to Reprint/ Modify/Adapt for Use. Retrieved from http //www.tutorialspoint.com/six sigma/index.htm Successful Health and Safety Management, hsg65. (1997). Health and safety Executive, Crown Pubhshing, permission to Reprint. Retrieved from http //biLly/YKDzRk... 

Metrics for this might include number of excursions from statistical process control, but one very useful metric for controllability is process capability, or more accurately, process capability indices. Process capability compares the output of an in-control process to the specification limits by using capability indices. The comparison is made by forming the ratio of the spread between the process specifications (the specification width ) to the spread of the process values. In a six-sigma environment, this is measured by six standard deviation units for the process (the process width ). A process under control is one where almost all the measurements fall inside the specification limits. The general formula for process capability index is ... 

FIGURE i 6 Diagram indicating that the total variance in the analysis results equals the sum of the method variance and the process variance. A capable measurement system has a method variance that is less than 30% of the design width (difference between upper specification level and lower specification level). The production process is considered to be under full control when the average assay value is centered at Six Sigma values away from the lower and upper specification levels. 

A quality management system s process should follow a standard Six Sigma process improvement life cycle that includes the following steps define (process and metrics), measure and control (identify problems and issues), analyze (analyze problems and issues), and improve (implement) circling back to measure and control [11]. An example of a process improvement life cycle can be seen in Figure 9. 

Many CQI models exist. Examples of specific models include the plan, do, check, and act (PDCA) model and the find, organize, clarify, understand, select, plan, do, check, and act (FOCUS-PDCA) model and six sigma (Lazarus and Butler, 2001 Lazarus and Stamps, 2002). Most models include elements that reflect the following core concepts (1) plan, (2) design, (3) measure, (4) assess, and (5) improve (Coe, 1998a). 

Another company culture that many corporations are adopting or have adopted is the concept behind Six Sigma (Chowdury, 2001). Six Sigma represents a statistical measure and a management philosophy that gives people well-defined roles and a clear structure to their tasks. 

It works best when everyone in the company is involved. Six Sigma is a management philosophy focused on eliminating mistakes, waste, and rework. It establishes a measurable status to achieve and embodies a strategic problemsolving method to increase customer satisfaction and dramatically enhance the bottom line. 

Six Sigma process improvement disciplines are typically organized around the acronym MAIC. The first step in a MA1C cycle is a Measure step, wherein one finds appropriate process responses to observe, identifies and validates measurement systems and collects baseline process performance (process monitoring) data. The second step is an Analyze step. This involves summarizing the initial... 

The ability to perform validation cost-effectively is dependent on an organization s understanding of requirements and its validation capability. This chapter applies the established Capability Maturity Model (CMM) to computer validation. Examples of validation metrics and measures are examined. The metrics cover prospective validation as well as operation and maintenance of computer systems. Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma are promoted as tools that organizations can use to streamline and improve the performance of their validation processes. 

One way process capability can be measured is as a simple yield, or the percentage of times the process meets its requirements. The Six Sigma community created another metric, sigma level, to normalize capability readings for different types of processes. (How, for example, do you compare the capability of an invoicing process with the capability of a light bulb manufacturing process )... 

Figure I 9-5 Six Sigma methodologies for measuring process performance. Method of measuring process variation is applicable to analytical testing processes.

The discussion of sigma (a) given earlier deals with the natural variation in the process.Consequently, we denote the measurement of a as a measure of the voice of the process. This is clearly an internally focused assessment of process capability, i.e., the voice of the process. The probability of a defect in the process, i.e., failure to meet customer expectations, is commonly defined in terms of DPMO. The focus of DFSS is to achieve a minimum of six standard deviations between the mean and the nearest specification ( 6a), corresponding to 3.4 DPMO. Because the specifications are set to meet customer needs, six sigma in this... 

Most of the strategies devoted to managing risk in projects at the design stage target variability. One very popular tool is known as six-sigma (Pande and Holpp, 2001). Companies also make use of failure mode effects analysis (Stamatis, 2003), which is a procedure originated at NASA in which potential failures are analyzed and measures to... 

What is Six Sigma It presents an outstanding quality assurance standard. Envision a normal distribution chart, a bell curve. Variability from the mean, the center point of the distribution, is measured in units called sigma, which is defined as the standard deviation. At plus or minus three sigma, three standard deviations, 99.7% of a population would be included. In a manufacturing process using a three-sigma standard, approximately 2700 parts per million could be defective. 

Nevertheless, it should be understood that, in their safety achievements, a few companies have done better than Six Sigma. Assume that an OSHA recordable incident is the defect to be measured. How does 3.4 defective parts per million relate to an OSHA recordable incident rate OSHA rates are computed from a base of 200,000 hours worked. To be at an OSHA incident recordable rate of 3.4 incidents per million hours, the computed rate using a 200,000 hour base would 0.68. That rate has been bettered by a few of the best performing companies, but only a few. Thus, on occasion, humans are capable of doing better than Six Sigma. 

The Six Sigma approach is composed by five steps, i.e. the DMAIC algorithm (Fig. 1) Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control. 

Process control It is important to understand whether the proeess is in control. The number of data points that are more than three standard deviations away from the mean is an indication of the extent to which the process is out of control. What we want is zero data points outside these limits. Companies that have made great strides in process control measure the number of data points thatare outside six sigma limits. This can be used to truly understand variability... 

---