Shell models, ionic solids

In the shell model, as mentioned above, the short-range repulsion and van der Waals interactions are taken to act between the shell particles. This finding has the effect of coupling the electrostatic and steric interactions in the system in a solid-state system where the nuclei are fixed at the lattice positions, polarization can occur not only from the electric field generated by neighboring atoms, but also from the short-range interactions with close neighbors (as, e.g., in the case of defects, substitutions, or surfaces). This ability to model both electrical and mechanical polarizability is one reason for the success of shell models in solid-state ionic materials. 

As is obvious from the table, Tc is almost doubled upon deuteration. These isotope effects are one of the largest observed in any solid state system. The question arises about isotope effects in non-hydrogen-bonded ferro- and antiferroelectrics. As already mentioned in the Introduction, within a mean-field scheme and in a purely ionic model it was predicted that these systems should not exhibit any isotope effect in the classical limit, which has been verified experimentally. Correspondingly, there was not much effort to look for these effects here. However, using a nonlinear shell-model representation it was predicted that in the quantum limit an isotope effect should... 

A defining feature of the models discussed in the previous section, regardless of whether they are implemented via matrix inversion, iterative techniques, or predictive methods, is that they all treat the polarization response in each polarizable center using point dipoles. An alternative approach is to model the polarizable centers using dipoles of finite length, represented by a pair of point charges. A variety of different models of polarizability have used this approach, but especially noteworthy are the shell models frequently used in simulations of solid-state ionic materials. 

The final term in this potential model is that due to polarisation effects. In the solid environment there is likely to be some distortion of electron clouds due to the surrounding electric field, and this must be taken into account when modelling the interactions of an essentially ionic system. The polarisability in this case is modelled using the shell model of Dick and Overhauser. Here the atom is considered to consist of a massless charged shell, for the valence electrons, and a charged core. The two components are linked via a harmonic spring, and displacement of the valence electrons takes place with respect to the following equation... 

The shell model is an attempt to treat a form of covalency in an ionic solid. However, the total-energy treatment of bonded systems requires the addition of several so-called bonded terms. The first of the bonded terms of Equation (2), the bond stretch term can be represented as a simple quadratic (harmonic) expression ... 

Fisler DK, Gale JD, Cygan RT (2000) A shell model for the simulation of rhombohedtal carbonate minerals and their point defects. Am Miner 85 217-224 Gale JD (1996) Empirical potential derivation for ionic materials. Phil Mag B 73 3-19 Gale JD (1997) GULP - A computer program for the syrmnetry adapted simulation of solids. J Chem Soc... 

A further refinement of the nonbonded energy terms that is often implemented ill (he modeling of ionic solids—where the first two terms of Eq. [1] are sufficient for describing the total energy—is the incorporation of a shell model (Dick Over-haiiscr, 19. 8). rhis approach introduces a polarization energy term to account for... 

Solid state physicists are familiar with the free- and nearly free-electron models of simple metals [9]. The essence of those models is the fact that the effective potential seen by the conduction electrons in metals like Na, K, etc., is nearly constant through the volume of the metal. This is so because (a) the ion cores occupy only a small fraction of the atomic volume, and (b) the effective ionic potential is weak. Under these circumstances, a constant potential in the interior of the metal is a good approximation—even better if the metal is liquid. However, electrons cannot escape from the metal spontaneously in fact, the energy needed to extract one electron through the surface is called the work function. This means that the potential rises abruptly at the surface of the metal. If the piece of metal has microscopic dimensions and we assume for simplicity its form to be spherical - like a classical liquid drop, then the effective potential confining the valence electrons will be spherically symmetric, with a form intermediate between an isotropic harmonic oscillator and a square well [10]. These simple model potentials can already give an idea of the reason for the magic numbers the formation of electronic shells. 

Aqueous Solvation.—A review, covering the 1968—1972 publications, deals with physical properties, thermodynamics, and structures of non-aqueous and aqueous-non-aqueous solutions of electrolytes, and complete hydration limits. Thermodynamic aspects of ionic hydration also reviewed include the thermodynamic theory of solvation the molecular interpretation of ionic hydration hydration of gaseous ions (AG s, H s, and AA s) thermodynamic properties of ions at infinite dilution in water, solvent isotope effect in hydration reference solvents and ionic hydration and excess properties. A third review on the hydration of ions emphasizes the structure of water in the gaseous, liquid, and solid states the size of ions and the hydration numbers of ions and the structure of the hydrated shell from measurements of mobility, compressibility, activity, and from n.m.r. spectra. Pure water and aqueous LiCl at concentrations up to saturation have been examined by neutron and X-ray diffraction. For the neutron studies LiCl and D2O are employed. The data are consistent with a simple model involving only... 

---