Self-similarity plot

Thus, we plot M(x,t)IMi vs xls(t). As noted earlier, the cluster size distribution and the first moment of the size distribution are averaged over the entire journal bearing. As indicated by the behavior of P in Fig. 39b, the cluster size distribution becomes self-similar when the average size is about 10 particles per cluster. 

Figure 8.14 shows a sketch of the plot that is utilized for the purpose of fractal analysis. For the theoretical fractal self-similarity holds for all orders of magnitude - to be measured in units of space (r) or reciprocal space (s)53. In practice, a fractal regime is limited by a superior cut and a lower cut54. In the sketch superior and lower cut limit the fractal region to two orders of magnitude in which self-similarity may be governing the materials structure. 

Watanabe et al. [425] assert that the nitridation kinetics is self-similar when plotted versus 9 t rather than t alone. Plot the calculated and experimental [N(s)] values from the previous task as a function of 9 t to verify this. 

This equation reveals that when measurements for fractal objects or processes are carried out at various resolutions, the log-log plot of the measured characteristic 9 (oj) against the scale oj is linear. Such simple power laws, which abound in nature, are in fact self-similar if oj is rescaled (multiplied by a constant), then 9 (oj) is still proportional to oja, albeit with a different constant of proportionality. As we will see in the rest of this book, power laws, with integer or fractional exponents, are one of the most abundant sources of self-similarity characterizing heterogeneous media or behaviors. 

We are drawn to the conclusion that log-log fractal plots are useful for the correlation of adsorption data - especially on well-defined porous or finely divided materials. A derived fractal dimension can also serve as a characteristic empirical parameter, provided that the system and operational conditions are clearly recorded. In some cases, the fractal self-similarity (or self-affine) interpretation appears to be straightforward, but this is not so with many adsorption systems which are probably too complex to be amenable to fractal analysis. 

So far, we have been talking about the stability of zero pressure gradient flows. It is possible to extend the studies to include flows with pressure gradient using quasi-parallel flow assumption. To study the effects in a systematic manner, one can also use the equilibrium solution provided by the self-similar velocity profiles of the Falkner-Skan family. These similarity profiles are for wedge flows, whose external velocity distribution is of the form, 11 = k x . This family of similarity flow is characterized by the Hartree parameter jSh = 2 1 the shape factor, H =. Some typical non-dimensional flow profiles of this family are plotted against non-dimensional wall-normal co-ordinate in Fig. 2.7. The wall-normal distance is normalized by the boundary layer thickness of the shear layer. 

ZOpT can be used to study both self-similar and self-affine fractal objects. The data at low frequencies (u and v <10) is not to be included in the calculation of D j. Figure 17.25 from Tang and Marangoni (2006) illustrates how Df, and ZOpT are calculated from the double logarithmic plot ofX vs. Y for polarized light microscopy images of the fat crystal networks. 

A similar pair-wise comparison can be used to evaluate the self-similarity of a database of structures. This approach also allows direct visual comparison of databases or database subsets if the coefficient distributions are plotted as a graph or histogram and this approach can be used for either self-similarity or for database comparison (Chart 1). 

Figure 19.2 Self-similarity analysis for nanotextured silver surfaces prepared in different ways. The root mean square roughness inferred from atomic force microscopy is plotted versus measurement area. The various surfaces are 100 nm thick evaporated silver films (solid squares, red line)-, 5.2 nm thick evaporated silver films (open circles, green line) nanoparticle films assembled from colloid attachment to self-assembled monolayers (solid circles, blue line) films from deliberate precipitation of silver colloid (solid up-triangles, black line) Tollens reaction films (open down-triangles, orange line). Lines with slopes H = 1.0 and H = l.S representing two-dimensional and 1.5 dimensional surfaces respectively are...

EWF determination. After the P-d traces were checked for self-similarity (satisfied by all the systems with post-yielding behaviour and even for PC), wp-L valid points were selected according to the mean value of Omax (Om) criteria 0.9o,n > Omax > 1 lOm [22], and plotted as shown in Fig. 5. In order to increase the accuracy of parameter determination, verification of the upper limit of valid ligamet length (Lmax) was made by the plastic zone size estimation (2rp), using the following relationship ... 

The second grade, HD5502XA, was tested at 10 mm/s and 100 mm/s, using 0.8 mm and 1.6 mm thick specimens. Figure 16 presents a set of load-displacement curves for 0.8 mm thick specimens tested at 10 mm/s. The self-similarity of the curves can still be observed, but the variation in the separation distance is much more pronounced. This causes large scatter not only in the separation displacement plot (Fig. 19) but also in specific work of fracture data (Fig. 17), while 0 -1 plot is largely unaffected and reasonably linear (Fig. 18). 

Fig. 3.2. Example of the blinking time trace of a single semiconductor nanocrystal. Magnification of the time-trace show the self-similar character of the on- and off-time pattern. The lower plots are probability distributions for on- and off-times fitted by...

The generation parameter defining the generation of ionizing trajectories in the self-similar structure in Fig. 10 is related to the number w of encounters of the two electrons at ri = T2 rather than to the ionization time. This interpretation is confirmed in Fig. 11 which shows the density n of trajectories starting with initial conditions uniformly distributed in the middle panel of Fig. 10 as function of the number w of encounters of the two electrons and of the ionization time T. The density n is proportional to minus the derivative of the survival probability with respect to the relevant variable (w or T). The logarithmic plot in Fig. 11a reveals an exponential decay of the density, n(w)ocexp(—0.27w), and hence also of the survival probability, as a function of the number of encounters of the two electrons, just as expected for a self-similar fractal set of trapped trajectories. The doubly logarithmic plot of the density of trajectories in Fig. 11b reveals a power-law decay of the density, (T) oc and hence... 

Figure 10. I(q,t)q3 versus q/qm plots at various T-jumps for self-similarity tests.

Apparently from the plots of log10 K (Fig. 47a) and log10 p (Fig. 47b) of the fractal ensemble versus the iteration step, number n, all these elastic properties behave like fractals before an eventual levelling off. The latter is obviously associated with the upper limit of fractal-like asymptotics, above which the elastic properties of a system are no longer p dependent on the scale—that is, on the iteration number (the loss of the self-similarity property occurs at iteration step n q = logc/log/o which defines the correlation length c at the given concentration, p). 

A solution, such as u(y, t) in the present problem, that depends on a single dimensionless variable < instead of y and / separately is said to be self-similar, and this designation is also the source of the names similarity variable and similarity transformation, 17 The basic idea of self-similarity is that the series of profiles u(y, t) for various fixed times t will collapse into a single, universal form when u is plotted as a function of rj rather than as a function ofy. 

Dot plots are a powerful method of comparing two sequences. They do not predispose the analysis in any way such that they constitute the ideal first-pass analysis method. Based on the dot plot the user can decide whether he deals with a case of global, i.e., beginning-to-end similarity, or local similarity. Local similarity denotes the existence of similar regions between two sequences that are embedded in the overall sequences which lack similarity. Sequences may contain regions of self-similarity which are frequently termed internal repeats. A dot plot comparison of the sequence itself will reveal internal repeats by displaying several parallel diagonals. 

Ideally, any diversity-based design using a similarity radius-based concept should result in a diverse, but representative child library. Not too few compounds should be selected to maintain information from the entire virtual library. Database self-similarity and comparison plots are useful tools in this context for analysis to monitor diversity, repre-sentivity and complementarity to a corporate collection, as shown schematically in Figure 13.11. 

Figure 13.11. Database comparison histograms to illustrate an optimal diverse database selection (upper panel), a highly redundant database selection (middle panel), and a database selection with loss of information (lower panel). The left column show simplified representations of databases as distribution of molecules (filled circles) in an arbitrary 2D molecular property space. In the middle left column, idealized self-similar histograms are given, while the plots in the middle right column show plots obtained by comparing the database subset to the entire database. The right column refers to plots obtained by comparison to a corporate database. Dotted vertical lines indicate the similarity radius for a particular descriptor.

---