Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Self-polarizability method

Most of these developments may be applied most directly within the framework of the isolated molecule method, in which the reactivity indices are the charges and self-polarizabilities of the unperturbed ground state of a given molecule calculations based on the localization model (e.g. Nesbet, 1962) have made less progress, and will not be considered. It is therefore natural to enquire whether indices similar to and tt,, in Hiickel theory can still be defined, and calculated more precisely, in self-consistent field theory. The obvious questions are... [Pg.129]

These free valence numbers in the S method run parallel to the self-polarizability from the M.O. description which has still to be discussed. A larger free valence therefore also means a smaller activation energy for (electrophilic) substitution and probably for radical substitution (p. 284). A high bond order runs parallel to a low bond localization energy of a tu electron pair in this bond and thus with a low activation energy for molecular addition and ozonization. [Pg.273]

The charge density index refers to the nature of the molecule before allowance is made for perturbing effects due to the approaching reactant. Such a method is often called a first-order method, a terminology that is discussed more fully in Chapter 12. For alternant molecules, it is necessary to proceed to a high-order method, one that reflects the ease with which molecular charge is drawn toward some atom, or pushed away from it, as approach by a charged chemical reactant makes that atom more or less attractive for electrons. An index which measures this is called atom self-polarizability, symbolized 7tr,r- The formulas for this and related polarizabilities are derived in Chapter 12. For now, we simply note that the formula is... [Pg.291]

Conceptually, the self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) model is the simplest method for inclusion of environment implicitly in the semi-empirical Hamiltonian24, and has been the subject of several detailed reviews24,25,66. In SCRF calculations, the QM system of interest (solute) is placed into a cavity within a polarizable medium of dielectric constant e (Fig. 2.2). For ease of computation, the cavity is assumed to be spherical and have a radius ro, although expressions similar to those outlined below have been developed for ellipsoidal cavities67. Using ideas from classical electrostatics, we can show that the interaction potential can be expressed as a function of the charge and multipole moments of the solute. For ease... [Pg.26]

The most common approach to solvation studies using an implicit solvent is to add a self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) term to an ab initio (or semi-empirical) calculation. One of the problems with SCRF methods is the number of different possible approaches. Orozco and Luque28 and Colominas et al27 found that 6-31G ab initio calculations with the polarizable continuum model (PCM) method of Miertius, Scrocco, and Tomasi (referred to in these papers as the MST method)45 gave results in reasonable agreement with the MD-FEP results, but the AM1-AMSOL method differed by a number of kJ/mol, and sometimes gave qualitatively wrong results. [Pg.136]

The second-order changes, in terms of which polarizability coefficients may be defined, are much more difficult to discuss because they involve essentially a change in the wave function (made in such a way as to preserve self-consistency)—unlike the first-order changes, which involve the Mwperturbed wave function only. Approximate formulae for the polarizabilities were first obtained (McWeeny, 1956) using a steepest descent method to minimize the energy, a useful result being the establishment of a connection between tt,, and F, valid for systems of any kind (non-alternant or heteroaromatic included) and applicable either in Hiickel theory or in a more complete theory. [Pg.133]

Organometallic systems such as porphyrines have been investigated because of the possibility to fine tune their response by functionalization[105-107]. Systems of increased the dimensionality have been of particular interest [108-111], Concomitant to the large effort to establish useful structure-to-properties relationships, considerable effort has now been put to investigate the environmental effects on TPA[112-114], For example, the solvent effect has been studied for a small linear push-pull chromophore using a self-consistent reaction field (homogeneous solvation) method employing a spherical cavity and an internal force field (IFF) method[l 12] in another study the polarizable continuum model has been employed to calculate the relevant quantities to obtain the TPA cross-section in the limit of a two-state model[113] Woo et al. made a critical study of experimental comparison of TPA cross-sections in different solvents[114]. [Pg.291]

R. Cammi and J. Tomasi, Nonequilibrium solvation theory for the polarizable continuum model - a new formulation at the SCF level with application to the case of the frequency-dependent linear electric-response function, Int. J. Quantum Chem., (1995) 465-74 B. Mennucci, R. Cammi and J. Tomasi, Excited states and solvatochromic shifts within a nonequilibrium solvation approach A new formulation of the integral equation formalism method at the self-consistent field, configuration interaction, and multiconfiguration self-consistent field level, J. Chem. Phys., 109 (1998) 2798-807 R. Cammi, L. Frediani, B. Mennucci, J. Tomasi, K. Ruud and K. V. Mikkelsen, A second-order, quadratically... [Pg.386]

Our present focus is on correlated electronic structure methods for describing molecular systems interacting with a structured environment where the electronic wavefunction for the molecule is given by a multiconfigurational self-consistent field wavefunction. Using the MCSCF structured environment response method it is possible to determine molecular properties such as (i) frequency-dependent polarizabilities, (ii) excitation and deexcitation energies, (iii) transition moments, (iv) two-photon matrix elements, (v) frequency-dependent first hyperpolarizability tensors, (vi) frequency-dependent polarizabilities of excited states, (vii) frequency-dependent second hyperpolarizabilities (y), (viii) three-photon absorptions, and (ix) two-photon absorption between excited states. [Pg.538]


See other pages where Self-polarizability method is mentioned: [Pg.87]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.710]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.495]   


SEARCH



Self-polarizability

© 2024 chempedia.info