Integral equation formalism

Several interesting topics have been excluded, perhaps somewhat arbitrarily, from the scope of this book. Specifically, we do not discuss analytical theories, mostly based on the integral equation formalism, even though they have contributed importantly to the field. In addition, we do not discuss coarse-grained, and, in particular, lattice and off-lattice approaches. At the opposite end of the wide spectrum of methods, we do not deal with purely quantum mechanical systems consisting of a small number of atoms. 

A method, integral equation formalism (lEF), can treat solvent effects. It exploits a single common approach for dielectrics of very different nature standard isotropic liquids, intrinsically anisotropic media like liquid crystals, and ionic solutions (Men-nucci et al., 1997). 

The integral equation formalism (IEF) introduced by Cances, Mennucci, and Tomasi [53] in PCM also has much to do with the COSMO boundary condition. Indeed, it can be shown to be... 

E. Cances, B. Mennucci and J. Tomasi, A new integral equation formalism for the polarizable continuum model theoretical background and applications to isotropic and anisotropic dielectrics, J. Chem. Phys., 107 (1997) 3032. 

B. Mennucci, R. Cammi and J. Tomasi, Excited states and solvatochromic shifts within a nonequilibrium solvation approach A new formulation of the integral equation formalism method at the self-consistent field, configuration interaction, and multiconfiguration self-consistent field level, J. Chem. Phys., 109 (1998) 2798. 

There are currently three different approaches for carrying out ASC-PCM calculations [1,3]. In the original method, called dielectric D-PCM [18], the magnitude of the point charges is determined on the basis of the dielectric constant of the solvent. The second approach is C-PCM by Cossi and Barone [24], in which the surrounding medium is modelled as a conductor instead of a dielectric. The third, IEF-PCM method (Integral Equation Formalism) by Cances et al the most recently developed [16], uses a molecular-shaped cavity to define the boundary between solute and dielectric solvent. We have to mention also the COSMO method (COnductorlike Screening MOdel), a modification of the C-PCM method by Klamt and coworkers [26-28], In the latter part of the review we will restrict our discussion to the methods that actually are used to model solute-solvent interactions in NMR spectroscopy. 

The form of the free energy functional G appearing in the Polarizable Continuum Model is discussed in refs [35-37], Recently, Mennucci and Cammi have extended their integral equation formalism model for medium effects on shielding to the NMR shielding tensor for solutions in liquid crystals [38,39],... 

R. Cammi and J. Tomasi, Nonequilibrium solvation theory for the polarizable continuum model - a new formulation at the SCF level with application to the case of the frequency-dependent linear electric-response function, Int. J. Quantum Chem., (1995) 465-74 B. Mennucci, R. Cammi and J. Tomasi, Excited states and solvatochromic shifts within a nonequilibrium solvation approach A new formulation of the integral equation formalism method at the self-consistent field, configuration interaction, and multiconfiguration self-consistent field level, J. Chem. Phys., 109 (1998) 2798-807 R. Cammi, L. Frediani, B. Mennucci, J. Tomasi, K. Ruud and K. V. Mikkelsen, A second-order, quadratically... 

The most sophisticated methods developed to date to treat solvent effects in electronic interactions and EET are those reported by Mennucci and co-workers [47,66,67], Their procedure is based on the integral equation formalism version of the polarizable continuum model (IEFPCM) [48,68,69], The solvent is described as a polarizable continuum influenced by the reaction field exerted by the charge distribution of the donor and acceptor molecules. In the case of EET, it is the particular transitions densities that are important. The molecules are enclosed in a boundary surface that takes a realistic shape as determined by the molecular structure. 

In the computational practice, the ASC density is discretized into a collection of point charges qk, spread on the cavity surface. The apparent charges are then determined by solving the electrostatic Poisson equation using a Boundary Element Method scheme (BEM) [1], Many BEM schemes have been proposed, being the most general one known as integral equation formalism (IEFPCM) [10]. 

CD spectra can be used for an exploration of intermolecular interactions. For example, flavanpentol, a dmg for different protein related diseases, has a benzene moiety and three chiral centers. Capelli et al. [293] studied the conformers that this molecule adopts when in close proximity to a proline-rich peptide in aqueous solution. The authors compared ECD spectra of conformers in gas phase and methanol computed with TDDFT at the B3LYP/6-31+G(d) level of theory. Solvent effects were modeled by an integral equation formalism of PCM. The authors noted... 

The so-called product reactant Ornstein-Zernike approach (PROZA) for these systems was developed by Kalyuzhnyi, Stell, Blum, and others [46-54], The theory is based on Wertheim s multidensity Ornstein-Zernike (WOZ) integral equation formalism [55] and yields the monomer-monomer pair correlation functions, from which the thermodynamic properties of the model fluid can be obtained. Based on the MSA closure an analytical theory has been developed which yields good agreement with computer simulations for short polyelectrolyte chains [44, 56], The theory has been recently compared with experimental data for the osmotic pressure by Zhang and coworkers [57], In the present paper we also show some preliminary results for an extension of this model in which the solvent is now treated explicitly as a separate species. In this first calculation the solvent molecules are modelled as two fused charged hard spheres of unequal radii as shown in Fig. 1 [45],... 

Generalized Bom (GB) approach. The most common implicit models used for small molecules are the Conductor-Like Screening Model (COSMO) [77,78], the DPCM [79], the Conductor-Like Modification to the Polarized Continuum Model (CPCM) [80,81], the Integral Equation Formalism Implementation of PCM (IEF-PCM) [82] PB models, and the GB SMx models of Cramer and Truhlar [23,83-86]. The newest Minnesota solvation models are the SMD universal Solvation Model based on solute electron density [26] and the SMLVE method, which combines the surface and volume polarization for electrostatic interactions model (SVPE) [87-89] with semiempirical terms that account for local electrostatics [90]. Further details on these methods can be found in Chapter 11 of Reference [23]. 

From a practical point of view, however, it is clear that the procedure described above is highly nontrivial Apart from the necessity to deal with mixtures of n-l-1 components, the way to carry out the limit n — 0 in practice is by no means straightforward. One method to deal with these difficulties is the replica integral equation formalism, which we will introduce Section 7.5. However, before doing this we first introduce the key concepts of the replica integral equations, which are the two-particle correlation functions of the QA system. 

Robert s team [76-78] performed ab initio and DFT calculations using Gaussian 03W v6.0 [80] on various amineboranes (Table 13.3). In Gaussian 03W, the aqueous media was modeled using a continuum of constant dielectric constant the Polarizable Continuum Model (PCM) solvation method in its lEFPCM (Integral Equation Formalism) version [81]. The latest version of HyperChem (v7.51) [19] was also used to perform PM3 calculations since this software does contain the parameters for the boron atom, as opposed to the original PM3 model. Ab initio and DFT calculations were also performed directly in HyperChem without any add-on. In HyperChem,... 

In the three PCM versions of the ASC method we shall consider here, the strategy consists in solving the system (1.6) and get the related potential V by exploiting an integral equation formalism. 

For QM solutes, volume polarization is treated approximately (but accurately [89]) by Eq. (11.17), and Chipman has called this approach surface and simulation of volume polarization for electrostatics [SS(V)PE] [15]. An equivalent form of Eq. (11.17) was actually derived prior to Chipman s work, where it was called the integral equation formalism (lEF) [10, 58]. The equivalence is not obvious, as the original lEF requires the solute s electric field as an input in addition to its electrostatic potential, but it was later shown that the former could be eliminated in order to obtain Eq. (11.17) [9]. The operator K can similarly be manipulated into different forms, by means of the identity [15]... 

---