Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Selectivity different aromatic compounds

The primary tropospheric oxidants are OH, O3, and NO3, with "OH and O3 reactions with hydrocarbons dominating primarily during daytime hours, and NO3 reactions dominating at night. Rate constants for the reactions of many different aromatic compounds with each of the aforementioned oxidants have been determined through laboratory experiments [16]. The rate constant data as well as atmospheric lifetimes for the reactions of toluene, m-xylene, p-xylene, m-ethyl-toluene, and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene appear in Table 14.1. Only these particular aromatic compoimds will be discussed in this review paper, since much of the computational chemistry efforts have focused on these compounds. When considering typical atmospheric concentrations of the major atmospheric oxidants, OH, O3, and NO3 of 1.5 x 10, 7 x 10, and 4.8 x 10, molecules cm , respectively [17], combined with the rate constants, it is clear that the major atmospheric loss process for these selected aromatic compounds is reaction with the hydroxyl... [Pg.298]

Normally cation type and amount are used to tune the selectivity for aromatic compounds (e.g. xylenes). Additionally, unexpected packing induced selectivity effects were observed for the liquid phase adsorption of aromatics. The adsorption of benzene, toluene, m-xylene and mesitylene from their binary mixtures with octene or octane was studied on Na-FAU having different Si Al-ratios. It was found that NaY (Si Al 2.79 low cation content) is a more selective adsorbent compared to NaX (Si Al 1.23 high cation content). As an example, the data for benzene are given in Figure 5. Furthermore, no differences were observed between the adsorption of aromatics on NaX and LSNaX (Si Al 1.02 very high cation content). [Pg.145]

Because nitration has been studied for a wide variety of aromatic compounds, it is a useful reaction with which to illustrate the directing effect of substituent groups. Table 10.3 presents some of the data. A variety of reaction conditions are represented, so direct comparison is not always valid, but the trends are nevertheless clear. It is important to remember that other electrophiles, while following the same qualitative trends, show large quantitative differences in position selectivity. [Pg.562]

Systematic studies of the selectivity of electrophilic bromine addition to ethylenic bonds are almost inexistent whereas the selectivity of electrophilic bromination of aromatic compounds has been extensively investigated (ref. 1). This surprising difference arises probably from particular features of their reaction mechanisms. Aromatic substitution exhibits only regioselectivity, which is determined by the bromine attack itself, i.e. the selectivity- and rate-determining steps are identical. [Pg.100]

Similarly, organic liquids have a variety of applications. For example, hexane, which frequently contains impurities such as aromatic compounds, is used in a variety of applications for extracting non-polar chemicals from samples. The presence of impurities in the hexane may or may not be important for such applications. If, however, the hexane is to be used as a solvent for ultraviolet spectroscopy or for HPLC analysis with UV absorbance or fluorescence detection, the presence of aromatic impurities will render the hexane less transparent in the UV region. It is important to select the appropriate grade for the task you have. As an example, three different specifications for n-hexane ( Distol F , Certified HPLC and Certified AR ), available from Fisher Scientific UK, are shown in Figure 5.5 [10]. You will see that the suppliers provide extra, valuable information in their catalogue. [Pg.127]

These constants, which are related to the structure of the molecules, allow an evaluation of the forces of interaction between the stationary phase and the solute for different classes of compounds. An index with an elevated value indicates that the stationary phase has a strong affinity for compounds that contain particular organic functions. This leads to a greater selectivity for this type of compound. For example, in order to separate an aromatic hydrocarbon contained in a mixture of ketones, a stationary phase for which benzenes have a very different constant than butanone will be selected. These differences in indices appear in most manufacturers catalogues of chromatographic components (Table 2.1). McReynolds constants have more or less replaced Rohrschneider constants, which are based on the same principle but use different reference compounds. [Pg.41]

The selectivity of the ammoxidation of molecules like toluene and xylene is much higher than that of the oxidation of these compounds to aldehydes. The selectivity difference is more pronounced here than in case of propene. The initial selectivities of the propene oxidation and ammoxidation are practically the same, and the selectivity difference is mainly due to the high stability of acrylonitrile compared with acrolein. For aromatic (amm)oxidation, however, the initial selectivities also differ. Apparently, ammonia interacts with the catalyst in such a way that the activity for oxidation of the aromatic nucleus is reduced. [Pg.221]

The observed effects of structure on rate and on orientation, confirmed by the Brown selectivity relationship, show that there is no basic difference between heterogeneous catalytic alkylation of aromatic compounds and homogeneous electrophilic aromatic substitution, cf. nitration, sul-phonation etc. This agreement allows the formulation of the alkylation mechanism as an electrophilic attack by carbonium ion-like species formed on the surface from the alkene on Br0nsted acidic sites. The state of the aromatic compound attacked is not clear it may react directly from the gas phase (Rideal mechanism ) [348] or be adsorbed weakly on the surface [359]. [Pg.336]

Are the primary differences in polarity Partition columns are available that vary in polarity from nonpolar (octyldecyl), through intermediate polarity (octyl and cyanopropyl), to polar (silica). Some columns have similar polarities, but differ in their specificity. Qg and the phenyl column have similar polarities, but Ci8 separates on carbon chain length, while phenyl separates fatty acids on both carbon number and number of double bonds. Phenyl columns also resolve aromatic compounds from aliphatic compounds of similar carbon number. In another example of similar polarities, C8 is a carbon number separator while cyanopropyl selects for functional groups. [Pg.68]

Thus the smaller /3", the smaller will be the difference in rates. This is the basis of the selectivity rule proposed by Brown and Nelson 28 the more reactive a given substituting agent, i.e. the more rapidly it attacks a given aromatic compound, the less selectivity it shows in choosing between one position and another. [Pg.91]

It is clear, as Katritzky et al. [7, 8] and ourselves [9] have pointed out, that aromaticity cannot be described with a single parameter. It is possible to select a parameter and classify aromatic compounds according to it and this approach is correct if one bears in mind that the aromaticity scale thus obtained is valid only for the chosen parameter. One of the most successful is Schleyer s NICS (nuclear independent chemical shifts) [10-12], a criterion we have used to separate aromatic and antiaromatic compounds [13], Cyranski et al. [14] as well as Sadlej-Sosnowska [15] have tried, with moderate success, to find an agreement between these different points of view. [Pg.156]


See other pages where Selectivity different aromatic compounds is mentioned: [Pg.53]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.1143]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.660]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.859]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.668]    [Pg.705]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.224]   


SEARCH



Aromatization selectivities

Compound selection

Selected Compounds

© 2024 chempedia.info