Selectivities enantioseparation

Enantioseparation is typically achieved as a result of the differences in interaction energies A(AG) between each enantiomer and a selector. This difference does not need to be very large, a modest A(AG) = 0.24 kcal/mol is sufficient to achieve a separation factor a of 1.5. Another mechanism of discrimination of enantiomers involves the preferential inclusion of one into a cavity or within the helical structure of a polymer. The selectivity of a selector is most often expressed in terms of retention of both enantiomers using the separation factor a that is defined as ... 

Tesafova, E., Bosdkovd, Z., and Zuskova, L, Enantioseparation of selected iV-tert-butyloxycarbonyl amino acids in high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis with a teicoplanin chiral selector. J. Chromatogr. A, 879, 147, 2000. 

Tesafova, E. and Bosikova, Z., Comparison of enantioseparation of selected benzodiazepine and phenothiazine derivatives on chiral stationary phases based on P-cyclodextrin and macrocyclic antibiotics, J. Sep. ScL, 26, 661, 2003. 

Chiral SFC can be performed in open tubular [41,42], and packed column [43,44] modes. Packed column SFC can be further categorized into analytical, semipreparative, and preparative SFC [7, 8], Packed column SFC is more suitable for fast separations than open tubular column SFC, since a packed column generally provides low mass transfer resistance and high selectivity [45, 46], Packed column SFC also provides high sample loading capacity [27,47], which can increase sensitivity. Only packed column SFC is suitable for preparative-scale enantioseparation. This chapter will focus on chiral separation using packed column SFC in the analytical scale. 

More than 100 CSPs are commercially available nowadays, which should make the separation of any pair of enantiomers feasible. However, the enantiorecognition mechanisms involved in the chiral recognition between the analytes and the CSPs are complex and therefore the selection of the appropriate CSPs, depending on the structure of the analyte, is a difficult task. A common approach to develop a new enantioseparation is the stepwise trial-and-error approach based on detailed consideration of the enantiorecognition mechanisms between the chiral selector and the analyte, or on the analyst s experience, or on the consultation of literature or databases. However, this approach is time-consuming and often unsuccessful owing to the fact that achieving enantioresolution is often purely empirical... 

Cherkaoui, S., and Veuthey, J. L. (2001). Use of negatively charged cyclodextrins for the simultaneous enantioseparation of selected anesthetic drugs by capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry. /. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. TJ, 615 — 626. 

In a comparable system, (I ,S)-ibuprofen can be separated by a membrane reactor [83], see Fig. 13.10. The technique comprises a stereo-specific hydrolysis by an enzyme. Subsequently, the enantiomeric ester is extracted into the organic phase on the other side of the membrane. In the system developed by Sepracor Inc., (i )-ibuprofen is selectively hydrolyzed by proteases in a hollow-fiber unit and the (S)-ibuprofen ester can be isolated at 100% yield. This configuration also applies for enantioseparation of other acids such as naproxen and 2-chloropropionic acid. 

Since one or more of the interactions in these systems might originate from the stationary phase, only a two- or a one-point interaction between the solute and the selector is necessary for mechanisms (2) and (3) to occur [50]. However, some of the CMPAs used in HPLC [37,40,51,52] have also been used as chiral selectors in CE [53-56], which indicates that at least one of the separation mechanisms between the selector and enantiomers is selective complex formation in the mobile phase in these cases, since there is no stationary phase present in CE. A recent example by Yuan et al. [57] is presented in Eigure 17.1. The authors introduced the use of (R)-A,A,A-trimethyl-2-aminobutanol-bis(trifluoromethane-sulfon)imidate as the chiral selector for enantioseparation in HPLC, CE, and GC. This chiral liquid serves simultaneously as a chiral selector and a co-solvent. 

The progress toward enantiomerically pnre drngs makes the selective and rapid analysis of enantiomers an important issue, both for chiral parity determinations and for enantioselective bioanalysis. Chankvetadze et al. [198] performed enantioseparations within an analysis time of 1 min for each of two chiral compounds (1,2,2,2-tetraphenylethanol and 2,2 -dihydroxy-6,6 -dimethylbiphenyl) by nsing a homemade capillary column containing monolithic silica modified with amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) (Figure 17.10). 

Kinetic resolutions by means of the selective formation or hydrolysis of an ester group in enzyme-catalyzed reactions proved to be a successful strategy in the enantioseparation of 1,3-oxazine derivatives. Hydrolysis of the racemic laurate ester 275 in the presence of lipase QL resulted in formation of the enantiomerically pure alcohol derivative 276 besides the (23, 3R)-enantiomer of the unreacted ester 275 (Equation 25) <1996TA1241 >. The porcine pancreatic lipase-catalyzed acylation of 3-(tu-hydroxyalkyl)-4-substituted-3,4-dihydro-2/7-l,3-oxazines with vinyl acetate in tetrahydrofuran (THF) took place in an enantioselective fashion, despite the considerable distance of the acylated hydroxy group and the asymmetric center of the molecule <2001PAC167, 2003IJB1958>. 

A selection of the most successful CSPs, chiral particles and chiral additive techniques used for analytical and preparative enantioseparation by LC is discussed in the following sections with respect to molecular recognition and experimental application. As additional sources of background information recent books and review articles2-16, which contain numerous relevant references and examine the most important aspects of the field of liquid chromatographic enantioseparation, should be consulted. 

A very clear scheme showing the main types of diaslereomeric derivatives formed from CDAs and chiral analytes was presented recently241 a modification of this is depicted in Figure 5 and indicates the great variety one has in selecting a convincing strategy for indirect enantioseparation. 

Cass et al. [66] used a polysaccharide-based column on multimodal elution for the separation of the enantiomers of omeprazole in human plasma. Amylose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) coated onto APS-Hypersil (5 /im particle size and 120 A pore size) was used under normal, reversed-phase, and polar-organic conditions for the enantioseparation of six racemates of different classes. The chiral stationary phase was not altered when going from one mobile phase to another. All compounds were enantioresolved within the elution modes with excellent selectivity factor. The separation of the enantiomers of omeprazole in human plasma in the polar-organic mode of elution is described. 

Advances in preparative enantioseparation by simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography have occurred in the last 10 years. SMB was invented in the 1960s and was used by the petrochemical and sugar industries. Now with the improvements in stationary phases and hardware it is an option for the large-scale preparation of enantiomerically pure material. The majority of the latest published data are using either amylose- or cellulose-based phases because of their selectivity. There are now examples in the literature of the commercial separation on the multi-ton scale.8... 

The effect of surface polarity is even more important in separations where two or more simultaneous interactions must occur in order to achieve the desired selectivity. This is particularly true in chiral separations. Since aqueous buffer systems are almost universally used as CEC mobile phases, enantioseparations are often run under re-versed-phase conditions as opposed to the normal-phase mode typically used in chiral HPLC. Therefore, non-specific hydrophobic interactions would be highly detrimental to the discrimination process that involves subtle differences between the enantiomers. 

Enantioseparation is an important goal for separation scientists. The most common strategy to achieve enantioselectivity is to perform the separation on a chiral column using a chiral selector immobilized onto the chromatographic stationary phase. The two enantiomers are selectively retained based on their different adsorption... 

In this chapter we will focus on the moleciilcir recognition niechanisms of the diverse chiral SOs and CSPs in combination with their spectra of applicability, but also aspects concerning the separation systems as well as on issues that are of interest for practical applications. This will include a discussion of structure resolution relationships as support for the selection of certain CSPs for a given separation problem, operation modes and mobile phase composition, stability, the ability to reverse the elution order to elute each of the enantiomers as the first peak, and loadability which is of primary importance for preparative enantioseparations. 

The column manufacturer has proposed the following strategy for column selection for an enantioseparation. 

---