Selected points, method

Use of Figure 9.2 requires that the temperature of the liquid be compared to its boiling point and its superheat-limit temperature. Table 6.1 provides these temperatures T), = 231 K, and 7, = 326 K. It is obvious that the liquid s temperature can easily rise above the superheat limit temperature when the vessel is exposed to a lire. Therefore, the explosively flashing-liquid method must be selected. This method is described schematically in Figure 9.5 (equal to Figure 6.29), and described in Section 6.3.3.3. 

We wish to test a new type of ceramic tube to the AljOg tube normally used to fabricate high-pressure sodium lamps in order to eompare lamp qualities and life-time operation. Select a method which would produce the desired results and describe how this would be accomplished. Note that the ceramic tube requires both strength and a high melting point. 

Successive quadratic programming (SQP) methods solve a sequence of quadratic programming approximations to a nonlinear programming problem. Quadratic programs (QPs) have a quadratic objective function and linear constraints, and there exist efficient procedures for solving them see Section 8.3. As in SLP, the linear constraints are linearizations of the actual constraints about the selected point. The objective is a quadratic approximation to the Lagrangian function, and the algorithm is simply Newton s method applied to the KTC of the problem. 

The best known application of experiment design is to find the extremum of a quantity depending on further variables by observing its value at appropriately selected points (refs. 43-46). In this section, however, consideration is restricted to design methods, purported to increase the reliability of estimates when fitting a model to observations. 

The remaining question is how to select this reference patch. One method would be to compute the sequential products of the ratios for randomly selected points of the input image. Next, the patch with the highest sequential product is chosen. This patch becomes the reference patch from which all random paths start. Land and McCann reject this possibility on the grounds that this solution is biologically not plausible. They settled on a method that does not require a scanning step that selects the area of highest reflectance. 

The Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM) has set up a definition of primary methods [1, 2] and has selected some methods with the potential of being primary , from the viewpoint of the end user. From the point of view of metrology, methods used for linking the chemical measurements with the SI system at the highest level should not refer to other amount of substance standards. This requirement excludes methods which are relative in their principle. Some other methods identified as having the potential to be primary yield information expressed as amount fraction. This is essential for evaluation of purity, but in order to convert it to a value useful for transfer of the unit, additional information on the identity (molar mass) and content of the impurities is required. This additional information is needed to convert the result into amount content or similar quantities. 

An electric technique to measure the gas holdup was implemented by Linek and Mayrhoferova (1969). In this method, the surface elevation of the gas-liquid interface of the nonaerated and aerated liquid in the vessel is detected at certain selected points by means of an electrical probe. The height is determined by the vertical position of the probe at which the sum of contact times equals one-half of the measurement period. The gas holdup is then calculated from the total surface elevation, the cross-section of the reactor, and the liquid volume. The accuracy of the measured value of the total surface elevation is claimed by the authors to be +0.2 mm. 

A typical example of an efficient search technique by group experiments is known as the Five-Point Method and is explained in the following. The basis of this method is first to select the overall range of the surface to be examined and then to determine the values of the objective function at both extremes of the surface and at three other points at equally spaced intervals across the surface. Figure 11-13 shows a typical result for these initial five points for a simplified two-dimensional case in which only one maximum or minimum is involved. 

---