Section 4.23 Microfiltration

Cross-flow-elec trofiltratiou (CF-EF) is the multifunctional separation process which combines the electrophoretic migration present in elec trofiltration with the particle diffusion and radial-migration forces present in cross-flow filtration (CFF) (microfiltration includes cross-flow filtration as one mode of operation in Membrane Separation Processes which appears later in this section) in order to reduce further the formation of filter cake. Cross-flow-electrofiltratiou can even eliminate the formation of filter cake entirely. This process should find application in the filtration of suspensions when there are charged particles as well as a relatively low conduc tivity in the continuous phase. Low conductivity in the continuous phase is necessary in order to minimize the amount of elec trical power necessaiy to sustain the elec tric field. Low-ionic-strength aqueous media and nonaqueous suspending media fulfill this requirement. 

Filtration Cross-flow filtration (microfiltration includes cross-flow filtration as one mode of operation in Membrane Separation Processes which appears earlier in this section) relies on the retention of particles by a membrane. The driving force for separation is pressure across a semipermeable membrane, while a tangential flow of the feed stream parallel to the membrane surface inhibits solids settling on and within the membrane matrix (Datar and Rosen, loc. cit.). 

The concept of cross-flow microfiltration is shown in Figure 16.11, which represents a cross-section through a rectangular or tubular membrane module. The particle-containing fluid to be filtered is pumped at a velocity in the range 1-8 m/s parallel to the face of the membrane and with a pressure difference of 0.1-0.5 MN/m2 (MPa) across the membrane. The liquid penneates through the membrane and the feed emerges in a more concentrated form at the exit of the module.1617 All of the membrane processes are listed in Table 16.2. Membrane processes are operated with such a cross-flow of the process feed. 

S-layer ultrafiltration membranes (SUMs) are isoporous structures with very sharp molecular exclusion limits (see Section III.B). SUMs were manufactured by depositing S-layer-carrying cell wall fragments of B. sphaericus CCM 2120 on commercial microfiltration membranes with a pore size up to 1 pm in a pressure-dependent process [73]. Mechanical and chemical resistance of these composite structures could be improved by introducing inter- and intramolecular covalent linkages between the individual S-layer subunits. The uni-... 

In the following section, film and gel-polarisation models are developed for ultrafiltration. These models are also widely applied to cross-flow microfiltration, although even these cannot be simply applied, and there is at present no generally accepted mathematical description of the process. 

Filtration can remove fine suspended solids and microorganisms, and microfiltration membranes of cellulose acetate or polyamides are available that have pores 0.1-20 /xm in diameter. Clogging of such fine filters is an ever-present problem, and it is usual to pass the water through a coarser conventional filter first. Ultrafiltration with membranes having pores smaller than 0.1 fim requires application of pressures of a few bars to keep the membrane surface free of deposits, water flows parallel to the membrane surfaces, with only a small fraction passing through the membrane. The membranes typically consist of bundles of hollow cellulose acetate or polyamide fibers set in a plastic matrix. Ultrafiltration bears some resemblance to reverse osmosis technology, described in Section 14.4, with the major difference that reverse osmosis can remove dissolved matter, whereas ultrafiltration cannot. 

Cross-section structure. An anisotropic membrane (also called asymmetric ) has a thin porous or nonporous selective barrier, supported mechanically by a much thicker porous substructure. This type of morphology reduces the effective thickness of the selective barrier, and the permeate flux can be enhanced without changes in selectivity. Isotropic ( symmetric ) membrane cross-sections can be found for self-supported nonporous membranes (mainly ion-exchange) and macroporous microfiltration (MF) membranes (also often used in membrane contactors [1]). The only example for an established isotropic porous membrane for molecular separations is the case of track-etched polymer films with pore diameters down to about 10 run. All the above-mentioned membranes can in principle be made from one material. In contrast to such an integrally anisotropic membrane (homogeneous with respect to composition), a thin-film composite (TFC) membrane consists of different materials for the thin selective barrier layer and the support structure. In composite membranes in general, a combination of two (or more) materials with different characteristics is used with the aim to achieve synergetic properties. Other examples besides thin-film are pore-filled or pore surface-coated composite membranes or mixed-matrix membranes [3]. 

Separation takes place in microfiltration primarily between solids and liquids, and many established applications are simply extensions of conventional filtration into a lower particle size range. (See Section I.A.) A homogeneous porous membrane used as a conventional depth filter traps particles on its surface and inside the tortuous pores. The membrane can become clogged... 

Microfiltration and UF membranes can be asymmetric, with a denser side and a more open side, or uniform without macrovoids (See Figure 16.3). The open area behind the denser surface in an asymmetric design means there is less resistance to water permeating the membrane. Operating pressure can be lower and the membrane systems can be more productive. The limitation of the asymmetric design is that the material, predominately used in the hollow fiber configuration, is not as strong as the uniform cross section. 

Extraction of the pyrrolizidine alkaloids and their N-oxides from plant sources is a critical first step in LG-MS analysis. Some methods of extraction already described (Section 13.2) consist simply of treatment with aqueous methanol and, following microfiltration (0.45 p.m), immediate LC-MS analysis with no further treatment. However, the aqueous methanol treatment will extract more than just the alkaloids. 

Basic Equations All of the processes described in this section depend to some extent on the following background theory. Substances move through membranes by several mechanisms. For porous membranes, such as are used in microfiltration, viscous flow dominates the process. For electrodialytic membranes, the mass transfer is caused by an electrical potential resulting in ionic conduction. For all membranes, Fickian diffusion is of some importance, and it is of dom-... 

Microfiltration and ultrafiltration are the two main filtration techniques for which ceramic membranes have been widely used to date. As described in Section 6.2.1.2, MF and UF ceramic membranes exhibit macro- and mesoporous structure, respectively, which result from packing and sintering of ceramic particles. Liquid flow in such porous media is convective in nature and the simplest description of permeation flux, J, is given by the Darcy s equation [20] ... 

FIGURE 20.4 Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) micrographs of the cross section of a cellulose acetate membrane of 0.45 pm pore size after being used for beer CMF experiments. A dense fouling layer is observed on the membrane surface. (From Moraru, C.I., Optimization and membrane processes with applications in the food industry Beer microfiltration. PhD thesis. University Dunarea de Jos Galati, Romania, 1999.)... 

Microfiltration membranes are commonly used in MBRs to separate sohds from water. The fluxes are very low, often below critical flux, and at low pressures when hollow fibers are used, backflushing is added to prevent or reduce flux decrease. MBRs are discussed in detail in Section 35.6.3.2, tubular modules with MF membranes have also been tested in the pulp and paper industry. 

Several researchers have shown that the application of an electrostatic field over the cross section of a membrane leads to a significant reduction in the energy cost per unit of permeate for microfiltration [38 0], ultrafiltration [41 4], and nanofiltration systems [45]. 

Our main concern here is to present the mass transfer enhancement in several rate-controlled separation processes and how they are affected by the flow instabilities. These processes include membrane processes of reverse osmosis, ultra/microfiltration, gas permeation, and chromatography. In the following section, the different types of flow instabilities are classified and discussed. The axial dispersion in curved tubes is also discussed to understand the dispersion in the biological systems and radial mass transport in the chromatographic columns. Several experimental and theoretical studies have been reported on dispersion of solute in curved and coiled tubes under various laminar Newtonian and non-Newtonian flow conditions. The prior literature on dispersion in the laminar flow of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids through... 

Curved slit channel with 180° curve section Polypropylene microfiltration membrane... 

---