Second-order reactions, complication

Slesser and Highet (S15) have proposed a theoretical model for the case of a second-order chemical reaction taking place in a slurry reactor. This model is based on concepts very similar to those employed by Sherwood and Farkas, apart from the obvious complications resulting when one treats a second-order reaction. 

Deriving the integrated rate equation of a second-order reaction is a little more complicated. Let us assume the second-order reaction... 

What about reactions of the type A + B — C This is a second-order reaction, and the second-order rate constant has units of M min-1. The enzyme-catalyzed reaction is even more complicated than the very simple one shown earlier. We obviously want to use a second-order rate constant for the comparison, but which one There are several options, and all types of comparisons are often made (or avoided). For enzyme-catalyzed reactions with two substrates, there are two Km values, one for each substrate. That means that there are two kcJKm values, one for each substrate. The kcJKA5 in this case describes the second-order rate constant for the reaction of substrate A with whatever form of the enzyme exists at a saturating level B. Cryptic enough The form of the enzyme that is present at a saturating level of B depends on whether or not B can bind to the enzyme in the absence of A.6 If B can bind to E in the absence of A, then kcJKA will describe the second-order reaction of A with the EB complex. This would be a reasonably valid comparison to show the effect of the enzyme on the reaction. But if B can t bind to the enzyme in the absence of A, kcat/KA will describe the second-order reaction of A with the enzyme (not the EB complex). This might not be quite so good a comparison. 

More complicated reactions that combine competition between first- and second-order reactions with ECE-DISP processes are treated in detail in Section 6.2.8. The results of these theoretical treatments are used to analyze the mechanism of carbon dioxide reduction (Section 2.5.4) and the question of Fl-atom transfer vs. electron + proton transfer (Section 2.5.5). A treatment very similar to the latter case has also been used to treat the preparative-scale results in electrochemically triggered SrnI substitution reactions (Section 2.5.6). From this large range of treated reaction schemes and experimental illustrations, one may address with little adaptation any type of reaction scheme that associates electrode electron transfers and homogeneous reactions. 

Consecutive second-order reactions are sometimes amenable to analytical treatment but the procedures are often complicated. In many real cases with reaction orders other than first order, the reactions are not purely consecutive but form a series—parallel system. 

In Chapter 8, we addressed proton transfer reactions, which we have assumed to occur at much higher rates as compared to all other processes. So in this case we always considered equilibrium to be established instantaneously. For the reactions discussed in the following chapters, however, this assumption does not generally hold, since we are dealing with reactions that occur at much slower rates. Hence, our major focus will not be on thermodynamic, but rather on kinetic aspects of transformation reactions of organic chemicals. In Section 12.3 we will therefore discuss the mathematical framework that we need to describe zero-, first- and second-order reactions. We will also show how to solve somewhat more complicated problems such as enzyme kinetics. 

In 1959, the coordinated mercaptide ion in the gold(III) complex (4) was found to undergo rapid alkylation with methyl iodide and ethyl bromide (e.g. equation 3).9 The reaction has since been used to great effect particularly in nickel(II) (3-mercaptoamine complexes.10,11 It has been demonstrated by kinetic studies that alkylation occurs without dissociation of the sulfur atom from nickel. The binuclear nickel complex (5) underwent stepwise alkylation with methyl iodide, benzyl bromide and substituted benzyl chlorides in second order reactions (equation 4). Bridging sulfur atoms were unreactive, as would be expected. Relative rate data were consistent with SN2 attack of sulfur at the saturated carbon atoms of the alkyl halide. The mononuclear complex (6) yielded octahedral complexes on alkylation (equation 5), but the reaction was complicated by the independent reversible formation of the trinuclear complex (7). Further reactions of this type have been used to form new chelate rings (see Section 7.4.3.1). 

Consider a second order reaction in the liquid phase between a substance A which is transferred from the gas phase and reactant B which is in the liquid phase only. The gas will be taken as consisting of pure A so that complications arising from gas film resistance are avoided. The stoichiometry of the reaction is represented by ... 

The constants for these second order reactions have been determined and they indicate that the first reaction proceeds at a considerably faster rate than the second reaction. It is possible that the van den Bergh reaction, as used in clinical chemistry, takes place in the same way but, as it is not taking place in a homogeneous medium, it is probable that the kinetics will be more complicated. 

The double exposure complications introduced by the first and second order reaction mechanisms in acrylate resists led to the conclusion that the flood and patterning exposure process was not a practical solution to the problem of high crosslink density in PM-15 resist. 

Although the order of a single mechanistic step can be predicted from the molecularity, the molecularity of a step, or steps, cannot be predicted from the order of the overall reaction. There are a number of complications which make it impossible to conclude automatically that a first-order reaction is unimolecular, that a second-order reaction is bimolecular, or that a third-order reaction is termolecular. In many cases, the reaction is a sequence of steps, and the overall rate may be governed by the slowest step. Experimental conditions might interchange the relative speeds of different steps, and the... 

The (effective) concentration of reactants is small, which is especially important in second-order reactions. It may be due to small total concentrations, to compartmentalization or immobilization, or to a complicated cascade of reactions with several side-tracks that consume reactants for other reactions. 

A reaction between A and B need not necessarily be second order. Reactions of a fraction rate order are common. A reaction such as 2A + B P may be third order (rate [A] [B]), or it may be second order (rate [A][B]), or a more complicated order (even a fractional order). 

Note that 4T/h has units of s and that the exponential is dimensionless. Thus, the expression in (3.1.17) is dimensionally correct for a first-order rate constant. For a second-order reaction, the equilibrium corresponding to (3.1.11) would have the concentrations of two reactants in the denominator on the left side and the activity coefficient for each of those species divided by the standard-state concentration, C, in the numerator on the right. Thus, C no longer divides out altogether and is carried to the first power into the denominator of the final expression. Since it normally has a unit value (usually 1 M ), its presence has no effect numerically, but it does dimensionally. The overall result is to create a prefactor having a numeric value equal to 4T/h but having units of M s as required. This point is often omitted in applications of transition state theory to processes more complicated than unimolecular decay. See Section 2.1.5 and reference 5. 

This approach, and transform methods in general, are useful only for linear problems hence second-order reactions or nonlinear complications cannot be treated by this technique. 

Now suppose the tip-generated species is not stable and decomposes to an elec-troinactive species, such as in the case (Chapter 12). If R reacts appreciably before it diffuses across the tip/substrate gap, the collection efficiency will be smaller than unity, approaching zero for a very rapidly decomposing R. Thus a determination of /x//s as a function of d and concentration of O can be used to study the kinetics of decomposition of R. In a similar way, this decomposition decreases the amount of positive feedback of O to the tip, so that ij is smaller than in the absence of any kinetic complication. Accordingly, a plot of ij vs. d can also be used to determine the rate constant for R decomposition, k. For both the collection and feedback experiments, k is determined from working curves in the form of dimensionless current distance (e.g., did) for different values of the dimensionless kinetic parameter, K = kcP ID (first-order reaction) or = k a CQlD (second-order reaction). 

Equations (1.30-1.32) can be applied for batch reactors independent of the which type of catalysis is operative, if reactions could be described by zero, first or second order. More complicated cases for Langmuir kinetics or Michaelis-Menten kinetics will be considered further. 

In order to simplify the interpretation of this somewhat complicated looking equation, the special but very common case of a second order reaction shall be considered first. This reduces Equ.(4-159) to ... 

The problem of reactions that do not go to completion is a frequently occurring one. We have shown here only the mechanics of deahng with a reversible system in which the reaction in each direction is first-order. Other cases that might arise are reversible second-order reactions, series reactions in which only one step is reversible, etc. These cases are quite complicated mathematically, and their treatment is beyond the scope of this book. However, many such systems have been elegantly described (see, for example, Schmid and Sapunov, 1982). The interested reader is directed to these worked-out exercises in applied mathematics for more details. 

The next example considers the slightly more complicated case of a second-order reaction in a perfectly mixed reactor, and also introduces a subtle assumption that has actually been made in the derivation of Eq. 12.4-1,2. 

The catalytic activity of the acid catalyst is due to hydrogen ions [55]. In the presence of a strong acid catalyst (e.g., p-toluene sulfonic acid), hydrogen ions are produced mainly from the added acid. Thus the polyesterification is a second-order reaction. In the absence of an acid catalyst, hydrogen ions are formed from the ionisation of dicarboxylic acid, and the order of the reaction is 2.5 [55]. More complicated rate equations are proposed by considering the reverse reaction, and the effect of dielectric constant of the medium on ionisation of diacid [56, 57]. 

In the above series, an important paper of Tyreus and Luyben [5] deals with second-order reactions in recycle systems. Two cases are considered complete one-pass conversion of a component (one recycle), and incomplete conversion of both reactants (two recycles). As general heuristic, they found that fixing the flow in the recycle might prevent snowballing. In the first case, the completely converted component could be fed on flow control, while the recycled component added somewhere in the recycle loop. In the second case, the situation is more complicated. Four reactant feed control alternatives are proposed, but only two workable. This is the case when both reactants are added on level control in recycles (CSl), or when the reactant is added on composition control combined with fixed reactor outlet (CS4). As disadvantage, the production rate can be manipulated only indirectly. Other control structures - with one reactant on flow control the other being on composition (CS2) or level control (CS3) - do not work. The last structure can be made workable if the recycle flow rates are used to infer reactant composition in the reactor. This study reinforces the rule that the flow rate of one stream in a liquid recycle must be fixed in order to prevent snowballing. 

The case of a steady- or unsteady-state reactor with a non-linear reaction rate is more complicated. For example, with a second-order reaction and isothermal conditions ... 

Even in the presence of two elementary stages kinetic equations of successive reaction become noticeably more complicated, if at least one of them passes due to the patterns of second-order reaction. Mathematic analysis of such mechanisms with the object of symbolic solution of direct kinetic problem in Mathcad is difficult, therefore in this case it is appropriate to use Maple s analytic facilities. It is still possible to get integrated forms of equations for some kinetic schemes in Maple. 

Even for more complicated reactions, the linear half-life expression is a good approximation for short times. Second-order reactions have a characteristic time of 1/kC, and a general time constant for higher-order reactions can be defined l/kC" . The concepts of rate and characteristic time are used interchangeably throughout the chapter. 

---