Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Screening of the Coulomb interactions

The next step to include electron-electron correlation more precisely historically was the introduction of the (somewhat misleading) so-called local- field correction factor g(q), accounting for statically screening of the Coulomb interaction by modifying the polarizability [4] ... [Pg.192]

Addition of salt leads to an additional screening of the Coulomb interaction [28, 32]. Our calculations for a multicomponent (polymer counterions salt) and a two component system (polymer counterions) demonstrate that the correlation functions can very well be described using the De-bye-Hiickel potential with a salt concentration dependent screening length. The effective potentials, however, strongly depend on the salt concentration. The counterion-counterion potential is weaker, whereas the monomer-monomer potential is stronger. The latter is a consequence of salt ion condensation on the polymer chain. [Pg.76]

V.2 Capacitance Measurements If the grains are conductors and stacked to form an electrode, one can determine the capacitance per grain. The surface potential C of the grain is proportional to the charge Qk ) in a blob of size vg", because measures the screening of the Coulomb interactions... [Pg.153]

Necessarily for any number of particles more than two, eqn. (211) cannot be solved exactly, even if v° = 0 and U = 0. When there are more than two particles, the motion of one particle, say j, causes both k and / to move. Now because k and / are perturbed by j, then the perturbation to the motion of k is felt by /. The motion of j affects / directly and also indirectly through k. These indirect effects are not usually very important, especially in chemical kinetics, because the particles most likely to react are those which are closest together. Under such circumstances, the direct effect is stronger than the transmitted and reflected components. These effects have been considered by Adelman [481], Freed and Muthukumar [482] and Allison et al. [483]. Adelman draws an interesting parallel between the screening of hydrodynamic repulsion and the electrolyte screening of a coulomb interaction [481]. [Pg.265]

Let us now consider the problem of bound states in plasmas. The interaction between the plasma particles is given by the Coulomb force. A characteristic feature of this interaction is its long range. Therefore, Coulomb systems show a collective behavior, so we can observe, for instance, the dynamical screening of the Coulomb potential and plasma oscillations. [Pg.228]

The second derivative (92E/dnidtij)0 is the energy of the Coulomb interaction between two electrons occupying orbitals i and and j, when taking the screening from all other electrons into account we designate this quantity as Uq. Choosing... [Pg.366]

Fig. 5. Kratky plot for SANS data taken from solutions of starburst polyamidoamine dendrimers with seven generations in deuterated water (extrapolated to zero concentration) and comparison with the gaussian blocks dendrimer model with b = 0.48 nm, n = 10, N = 7, Nb = 3 and f = 2. Salt was added to the solution in order to screen out the coulomb interactions... Fig. 5. Kratky plot for SANS data taken from solutions of starburst polyamidoamine dendrimers with seven generations in deuterated water (extrapolated to zero concentration) and comparison with the gaussian blocks dendrimer model with b = 0.48 nm, n = 10, N = 7, Nb = 3 and f = 2. Salt was added to the solution in order to screen out the coulomb interactions...
This simple modeling accounts fairly well for the short-range part of the Coulomb interaction. The long-range part is presumed to play a less important role near the Fermi surface, due to screening. [Pg.29]

Having obtained the zero frequency limit of the dynamic polarizability i.e., a = Iin, o7 (—wja ), we use a simplified approach to evaluate the screened dynamic response. This is necessary, since the expression given above, Eq. (40), for the polarizability neglects the induced collective effects essentially due to direct and exchange terms of the Coulomb interaction. To treat this screening approximately, we have used the simplified approach of Bertsch et al. [96] to include the induced electron interaction in the Ceo molecule, by a simple RPA type correction [92,95]... [Pg.20]

Thus, non-Ising behavior may be expected in systems determined by Coulomb and charge dipole interactions. However, due to the screening by counter ions the potential of the average force becomes short range. Therefore, Ising-like criticality may be restored as in liquid metals, where the electrons screen the interactions of the Coulomb interactions of the cores [84],... [Pg.162]

In the nonrelativistic limit, only the (LL LL) class of multi-centre integrals is needed this class is still the most important in relativistic calculations. In terms of the conventional expansion in powers of a, a DHF calculation at this level includes all the one-centre relativistic effects, screening by the Coulomb interaction, and some of the spin-other-orbit effects. The (LL 55) and (55 55)... [Pg.181]

Screening of electronic interactions can be qualitatively understood, but hardly subject to numerical estimates. The difficulty arises from the inhomogeneous nature of the medium, since the reduced interaction must be described at distances comparable to chemical bonds. Neither is it sufficient to consider only local effects of screening, nor to screen independently the various wavelengths in the Fourier transform of the coulomb interaction. Hubbard formulated an integral equation for the screened interaction, but only very approximate solutions seems to be feasible. We will demonstrate that some numerical evidence supports the determination of interaction integrals based on screening theory. [Pg.176]


See other pages where Screening of the Coulomb interactions is mentioned: [Pg.38]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.24]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.153 ]




SEARCH



Coulomb interaction

Coulomb interaction, screened

Coulomb screening

Coulombic interaction

Coulombic interactions screening

Interaction screening

Interactions screened

Screened coulomb

Screening of the interaction

The screened interaction

© 2024 chempedia.info