Scan rate increase

The Faradaic and capacitive components of the current both increase with the scan rate. The latter increases faster (proportionally to v) than the former (proportionally to y/v), making the extraction of the Faradaic component from the total current less and less precise as the scan rate increases, particularly if the concentration of the molecules under investigation is small. The variations of the capacitive and Faradaic responses are illustrated in Figure 1.7 with typical values of the various parameters. The analysis above assumed implicitly that the double-layer capacitance is independent of the electrode potential. In fact, this is not strictly true. It may, however, be regarded as a good approximation in most cases, especially when care is taken to limit the overall potential variation to values on the order of half-a-volt.10 13... 

The most important operational parameter is the scan rate. Increasing this parameter results in increasing interference of the electron transfer kinetics and in the passage from peak- to plateau-shaped responses. 

Because the CV is stretched, the separation between the peaks AE, (anodic and cathodic) increases from its theoretical values of 59/a mV, which characterizes a fully-reversible electron-transfer reaction (.see Table 6.3). The magnitude of the overshoot depends on the time lag, and therefore as the scan rate increases, so the separation between the peaks increases, thus causing the CV to look even more stretched. 

There are those who feel that there are not two distinct potentials. These workers propose that, when measured correctly, Eb6 and Ew are one and the same. In standard testing, the nucleation of pits occurs at Ev, but owing to the time necessary for pits to become established, the probability that pits will repassivate, and the finite potential scan rate used, pits do not cause a dramatic increase in the current until EM. This explanation would rationalize the often-observed effect that increasing the scan rate increases Ebi but not Eip. If I i is properly measured, these workers feel that it can be used as a go-no go potential for applications, i.e., if the potential of the alloy is always below Eip, then pitting cannot occur. 

This expression applies regardless of the diffusion coefficients of A and B. The increase in current with scan rate may be explained by the fact that as the scan rate increases, less time is available for the Nernst diffusion layer to relax into the solution by diffusion. Consequently, as the scan rate increases, the rate of change of concentration of A at the electrode surface increases, resulting in a greater flux of A to the electrode surface and hence a larger observed electrode current. 

The peak potential is a function of scan rate, unlike the case for a reversible process when the peak potentials are independent of scan rate. As the scan rate increases, the voltammetric peak becomes wider. Thus, the peak oxidation potential shifts to more positive potentials as the scan rate increases. 

The peaks become broader as the scan rate increases, and the peak current is below the value expected for a reversible electron-transfer process. 

The height of the peak is used to determine the concentration in the original solution. However the peak height is dependent on both the concentration and on the voltage scan rate. It is the area under the peak (in coulombs), which is proportional to the amount deposited in the deposition step. As the scan rate increases the peak becomes narrower and so the peak height will increase. However if the same deposition conditions are used and a fixed scan rate chosen the peak height should be proportional to the concentration of the analyte in the original solution. 

The height profiles extracted from the EC-AFM images showed that the actuation height decreases as the scan rate increases. This observation could easily be predicted from the time-limited diffusion process of sodium cations at the film/electrolytic solution interface. The actuation dependence on the potential scan rate was found to become weaker and more linear as the film thickness (or the electrodeposition time) decreases. As an illustration, the... 

Returning now to the operation of a DSC we observe that the operator can independently control the sample size (within the limits of the size of his pans). However, the time scale and the power level are not independently controllable since increasing the scanning rate increases the power (i.e., deviation from equilibrium) but decreases the time scale (i.e., measurement precision of velocity). Thus only if it should happen that there exists a sample size, compatible with the specimen cups, and a scanning rate, compatible with the instrument controls, for which a given reaction proceeds fast enough to yield a heat flow greater than the measurement precision yet not so fast as to cause a deviation from... 

Information regarding the diffusion coefficients of the cosubstrate in the enzyme film may be derived from cyclic voltammetric experiments in the absence of substrate such as those depicted in Fig. 16. As the scan rate increases, a larger and larger portion of the diffusion layer stands inside the film (at e.g., 20Vsec the widths of the reaction layer and of the film are respectively 1.2... 

Not only were more techniques accessible with the 170, but there was a wider choice of parameters than those available on the 171. The upper limit on scan rate increased to 500 V/s pulse durations would be varied from 1 ms to 500 s. For pulse techniques, pulse modulations were possible from 45-65 ms with a 5-20 ms current integration at the end of each pulse, all timing being synchronized with the mechanical drop timer. Full scale current outputs ranged from 1 nA to 0.5 mA. A tilt light was used to inform the operator that the sequence of operations could not be performed due to an invalid set of conditions chosen. 

An interesting case arises when the electrode reaction under study is reversible at low scan rates, but becomes irreversible as the scan rate increases. A characteristic of this type of reaction is the distinct change in the plot of ip versus as, first the equation for mechanism 1 holds good, and then the equation for mechanism 2 takes over. In the interval between these two mechanisms, the reaction is called quasi-reversible. 

It is important to note that the scan rate increase and/or temperature decrease leads to the formation of the additional (chemically irreversible) peak (Figures 2, 4 Table 1). Both - the scan rate increase (at the constant temperature) and the temperature decrease (at the constant scan rate) is indicative of the chemically irreversible character of the first electrode process and chemically reversible nature of the second electrode process (at low temperatures) However, it would not result in the complete separation of the overlapping peaks (under scan rate studied and temperature range accessible). It should be also no-noted that at the scan rate increase and/or temperature decrease the the first peak would grow but never over the height of the second one. 

As the scan rate increases, the chemical process becomes relatively slow on the timescale of the experiment. Consequently, at very high scan rates (10 V s ) the chemical step is outrun by the voltammetric scan, and a reverse peak is observed. Because the DPP is not consumed by the chemical reaction in the course of the scan, this reverse peak corresponds to the reoxidation of DPP to DPP+. 

This result shows that, for an irreversible surface-bound species, as the scan rate increases the overpotential (Epf) of the peak current increases in magnitude (for a reduction as is the case in this question, the value of Epf becomes more negative). 

Fig. 20.12 Representative cyclic voltammograms as a function of scan rate for an electronically conductive polymer film, polypyrrole. The scan rate increases from bottom to top, and the dashed lines refer to the voltammogram for the bare (support) electrode (e.g., glassy carbon).

Effects of scan rate on the cyclic voltanmiogram are shown in Fig.2. When the scan rate is relatively low (1 V/sec), III, is not shown. As the scan rate increases, IIIp becomes to appears. In case of peak II, II, moves to negative direction and II, moves to positive direction with increasing the scan rate. As shown in Fig. 2(d), III begins to appear at -l.lV(vs.SSCE). This peak grows continuously as the scan rate varies from 20 to 100 V/sec. The appearance of ni changes relative intensity between peak current of the first curve (ipj(,)] and that of the second curve [ip,i(B)]-... 

Multiple choice For the [Fe(CN)6] "(aq) + e = [Fe(CN)6] (aq) reaction, if the scan rate increases in cyclic voltammetry, the peak current magnitudes for the anodic and cathodic sweeps... 

---