Scaling of variables

Sometimes measurements are evenly distributed in the scores plot but one or more measurements fall distinctly outside the envelope of the other measurements. Also in this case, the measurements that fall outside the envelope should receive special attention. It might be that these measurements were faulty, for example, owing to problems with the sensor. It is best to eliminate such a measurement from the data set, at least initially. 

The details of the scores and loadings plot will be explained in chapter 21 however, as can already be seen, a principal component analysis can be useful in detecting outliers, abnormal patterns and redundant variables. 

It could be that the measurement set that is collected is not complete. This is often the case if quality measurements are included in the data set. Quality indicators, such as chromatographs, are prone to failure. In that case usually measurement values of zero or no good are stored. These values should be removed from the data set. However, the gap that is created in the data set, now has to be filled with good values. Since no values are available, one could use one of the following three approaches  

In general one could say that the second approach works reasonably well in many cases. 

The process variables that make up the data set usually relate to a variety of measurements, often with different physical meaning. Process measurements can often be divided into two groups measurements that are indicative of or related to quality and measurements that are not directly related to quality. Process measurements that fall into the first category are usually compositions, pressures and temperatures process measurements that fall into the latter group are usually flows, weights and volumes. Much of the variance in the latter group of variables can be explained by the variance of the process load. It is therefore useful to normalize these measurements by dividing them by the value of the process load. 

For response surface modelling, scaled variables, Xj, will be used intstead of the natural variable, u. The range of variation of each continuous variable, Uj, in the experimental domain will be linearly transformed into a variation of Xj centered around zero and usually spanning the interval [-1 Xj +1]. (For discrete variables on two levels, each level will be arbitrarily assigned the value — 1 or +1). The scaling is done in the following way  

Calculate the average, u , of the high level, and the low level, Then, determine the step of variation, Su, from the average to the high level. 

Example The influence of T, temperature variation, in the interval 20 — 60 C is studied. 

The average temperature is 40 °C. The step of variation from the average to the high level is 20 C. A scaled temperature variable, Xj, will thus be  

It is seen that the low level corresponds toxj. = —1, and the high level corresponds to Xy = +1. 

---

Silicates produce hard, dense, gray to grayish brown scales of variable composition. Silicates are complex materials and usually are associated with several cations, including sodium, magnesium, iron, and calcium. 

Currently, a good LP solver running on a fast (> 500 mHz) PC with substantial memory, solves a small LP in less than a second, a medium-size LP in minutes to tens of minutes, and a large LP in an hour or so. These codes hardly ever fail, even if the LP is badly formulated or scaled. They include preprocessing procedures that detect and remove redundant constraints, fixed variables, variables that must be at bounds in any optimal solution, and so on. Preprocessors produce an equivalent LP, usually of reduced size. A postprocessor then determines values of any removed variables and Lagrange multipliers for removed constraints. Automatic scaling of variables and constraints is also an option. Armed with such tools, an analyst can solve virtually any LP that can be formulated. 

Deflandre, B., Sundby, B., Gremare, a., Lefran ois, L., and Gagne, J.P. (2000) Effects of sedimentary microenvironments on the vertical distributions of oxygen and DOC in coastal marine sediments scales of variability. EOS Trans Am. Geophys. Union 80, 115. 

Environmental conditions in the Arctic, as elsewhere, are not static. Indeed, environments change over a large range of ecologically relevant scales diumally, seasonally, annually, decadally, and over centuries. The patterns and scales of variability of the physical environment set the framework conditions of species existence and community interactions. Arctic organisms, communities and ecosystems are thus adapted to the patterns of their respective local climates and the inherent environmental variability. Under such conditions, natural systems can be in quasi-equilibrium with the climate forcing mechanisms. 

FIGURE 1.4 Spatial and temporal scales of variability for atmospheric constituents. 

Scaling of variables and disturbances. Proper scaling is necessary for a meaningful computation of controllability indices. 

A measure that accounts for the different scales of variables and, in addition, for their correlations is the Mahalanobis distance. This distance invariant measure is calculated by the following formula ... 

The broad range of scales of variability of estuarine processes requires that quality controls also include data types complementaiy to fixed in situ sensors. Of particular interest are data collected from on-board sensors during vessel surveys, and an increasing range of remote sensing techniques. 

In any case, the significance of the data obtained by the different methods of sampling should be carefully evaluated, by comparing their resolution with the temporal and spatial scales of variability of the studied aquatic ecosystem. 

The relative gains are dimensionless and thus not affected by choice of units or scaling of variables. 

Finally, a blockscaling procedure [52], called block-adjusted non-scaled data , was used to allow peaks with minor intensity to contribute to the model without altering the relative scale of variables belonging to the same block. 

---