Complex samples

The IMS response for a compound is strongly dependent on temperature, pressure, analyte concen-tration/vapour pressure, and proton affinity (or elec-tron/reagent affinity). Pressure mainly affects the drift time, and spectral profiles are governed by concentration and ionisation properties of the analyte. Complex interactions among analytes in a mixture can yield an ambiguous number of peaks (less, equal to, or greater than the number of analytes) with unpredictable relative intensities. IMS is vulnerable to either matrix or sample complexity. 

Only the central section of the autocovariance function has to be calculated (Fig. 4.9) and simple computations are required to estimate the sample complexity, that is, the... 

The mathematical-statistical methods reviewed here have proven to be powerful tools for the extraction of the most relevant information on the separation sample complexity, separation performance, overlapping extent, and identification of ordered patterns present in spot positions related to chemical composition of the complex sample. 

It has been argued that in a typical 2DLC proteomic experiment, with only a limited number of fractions submitted for analysis in the second LC dimension, chromatographic peak capacity is less than 1000. This value is considerably lower than the expected sample complexity. Additional resolution is offered by MS, which represents another separation dimension. With the peak capacity defined as the number of MS/MS scans (peptide identifications) accomplished within the LC analysis time, the MS-derived peak capacity was estimated to be in an order of tens of thousands. While the MS peak capacity is virtually independent of LC separation performance, the complexity of the sample entering the MS instrument still defines the quality of MS/MS data acquisition. The primary goal of 2DLC separation is to reduce the complexity of the sample (and concentrate it, if possible) to a level acceptable for MS/MS analysis. What is the acceptable level of complexity to maintain the reliability and the repeatability of DDA experiments remains to be seen. 

Figure 6.4 Loss of resolution due to sample complexation with contaminating metal ions. Profiles of a 30 KD protein on Tosoh Phenyl 5pw. Elution in ammonium sulfate. EDTA was added to the sample and both buffers.

Calculation for Predicting the Concentration of Sample Complex Eluted From the Spin Column... 

Kershaw, 1989 Botto and Sanada, 1992 Meiler and Meusinger, 1992). However, coal is a structurally diverse material, and caution is to be exercised in the definition of chemical shift expectations. Thus, if structural definition is to be successful, the chemical shift relationships applied to coal and to coal-derived products should be lacking in ambiguity. Sample complexity will usually introduce a variety of ambiguities. 

The conditional stability constants calculated for the different salinity ranges are given in Table 5. It looks as if in the more saline samples complexes with lower K are formed. 

Resolution decreases with increasing sample complexity or contamination. ESI-electrospray ionization. 

Few review articles have been published on microextraction procedures based on the use of a liquid-phase extractant.1314 One drawback of drop-based microextraction procedures is drop vulnerability this relates to its instability and potential dislodgement, which could be caused by sample complexity, a long extraction time, and a fast stirring speed. As a result, precision will often suffer significantly. 

Since then much progress has been made in sample preparation techniques that reduce sample complexity. An overview of the sequence of extraction, isolation, and purification of nucleic acids is presented in Figure 8.1. It can be categorized in several unit steps beginning with the extraction of DNA until its sizing and sequencing. The different options within each step are listed in Table 8.1 and are described in this chapter. The technique best suited in a given application depends on ... 

Figure 2 Schematic of a strategy for reduction of sample complexity. By combining the fractionation of cell lysates by differential centrifugation with subsequent solution IEF, followed by parallel 2DE on a 20-gel platform, significantly more proteins per sample can be resolved and analyzed.

---