Sample distribution frequency

Sample distribution frequency in any one series should not be more than every two weeks and not less than every four months. A frequency greater than once every two weeks could lead to problems in turn-round of samples and results. If the period between distributions extends much beyond four months, there will be unacceptable delays in identifying analytical problems and the impact of the scheme on participants will be small. The frequency also relates to the field of application and amount of internal quality control that is required for that field. Thus, although the frequency range stated above should be adhered to, there may be circumstances where it is acceptable for a longer time scale between sample distribution, e.g. if sample throughput per annum is very low. Advice on this respect would be a function of the Advisory Panel. 

Of the 110 samples examined, only a few fell below the cutoff values for these externally contaminated samples and then by only marginal amounts. A criticism of these data may be that many samples only pass the cutoff values by trivial percentages and that these empirically determined cutoffs could be adjusted to take the data into account. Cutoff values of at least 214 for Rew would exclude all the samples in Figure 22 as contaminated, and at least 137 would exclude 95% of the samples as contaminated. Cutoff values this high would also preclude analysis of many, if not all, user samples. The frequency distributions of Rew and Rsz values for the specimens shown in Figure 22, that pass the respective cutoffs, are plotted in Figure 23 and compared to Baumgartner and Hill s distributions. The distributions are remarkably similar. 

In most analytical experiments where replicate measurements are made on the same matrix, it is assumed that the frequency distribution of the random error in the population follows the normal or Gaussian form (these terms are also used interchangeably, though neither is entirely appropriate). In such cases it may be shown readily that if samples of size n are taken from the population, and their means calculated, these means also follow the normal error distribution ( the sampling distribution of the mean ), but with standard deviation sj /n this is referred to as the standard deviation of the mean (sdm), or sometimes standard error of the mean (sem). It is obviously important to ensure that the sdm and the standard deviation s are carefully distinguished when expressing the results of an analysis. 

Infrared spectra are usually recorded by measuring the transmittance of light quanta with a continuous distribution of the sample. The frequencies of the absorption bands Us are proportional to the energy difference between the vibrational ground and excited states (Fig. 2.3-1). The absorption bands due to the vibrational transitions are found in the... 

If necessary, a term allowing for nuclear relaxation can also be included in Eq. (33). The frequency distribution detected by the spectrometer is the difference between 7 0 and the sample resonance frequencies. Hence the detected signal will be... 

For a quantitative test of the adequacy of the normal h3rpothesis, we may compare the observed frequencies with those predicted by theory. Since our sample consists of a reasonably large number of observations (140), we can expect it to be a fair approximation of the population distribution of the masses of the beans. If the population — the masses of all of the beans in the 1-kg package — deviates drastically from normality, we should be able to discover some evidence of this behavior in the sample occurrence frequencies. In other words, the sample frequencies should differ considerably from those expected from the normal distribution. 

Because of the finite linewidth Aco of the transition 1) 2) (for example, the Doppler width in a gaseous sample), the frequencies con = (E — E2)/h of the atomic transitions of our N dipoles are distributed within the interval Aco. This causes the phases of the N oscillating dipoles to develop in time at different rates after the end of the 7r/2-pulse aX t > r. After a time t > T2, which is large compared to the phase relaxation time T2, the phases are again randomly distributed (Fig. 7.20c,d). 

When the concentration of impurity follows a normal distribution in samples, the frequency of failure rate can be calculated (Table 7.1). These values are taken from a single side of the normal Gaussian error distribution, which can be found in statistics books such as the one by Montgomery and Runger.i... 

Sample Distribution and Frequency. The number of samples to be distributed in each round depends on whether the scheme covers a range of concentrations, as well as on the statistical design of the scheme. The frequency often relates to the field of application and the availability of reliable and stable quality control materials. The number of samples per analyte in each series should be below six so as not to burden the laboratory work, and to obtain information on the trends in a laboratory s performance the frequency of sample distribution in any series should not be more than every fortnight and not less than every 4 months. 

To pursue this idea, let us return to the nitrate ion determination described in Section 2.2. In practice it would be most unusual to make 50 repeated measurements in such a case a more likely number would be five. We can see how the means of samples of this size are spread about pi by treating the results in Table 2.2 as 10 samples, each containing five results. Taking each column as one sample, the means are 0.506, 0.504, 0.502, 0.496, 0.502, 0.492, 0.506, 0.504, 0.500 and 0.486. We can see that these means are more closely clustered than the original measurements. If we continued to take samples of five measurements and calculated their means, these means would have a frequency distribution of their own. The distribution of all possible sample means (in this case an infinite number) is called the sampling distribution of the mean. Its mean is the same as the mean of the original population. Its standard deviation is called the standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). There is an exact mathematical relationship between the latter and the standard deviation, [Pg.26]

Because of the finite linewidth Aco of the transition 1) 2) (for example, the Doppler width in a gaseous sample), the frequencies cou = (E — E2)/h of the atomic transitions of our N dipoles are distributed within... 

By definition, the particle size distribution frequency gives the fraction of particles of size x in the sample. The total mass of particles of size x in the feed for example is therefore the total mass of the feed M multiplied by the appropriate fraction dF/dx so that equation 3.3 becomes ... 

In contrast to a direct injection of dc or ac currents in the sample to be tested, the induction of eddy currents by an external excitation coil generates a locally limited current distribution. Since no electrical connection to the sample is required, eddy current NDE is easier to use from a practical point of view, however, the choice of the optimum measurement parameters, like e.g. the excitation frequency, is more critical. Furthermore, the calculation of the current flow in the sample from the measured field distribution tends to be more difficult than in case of a direct current injection. A homogenous field distribution produced by e.g. direct current injection or a sheet inducer [1] allows one to estimate more easily the defect geometry. However, for the detection of technically relevant cracks, these methods do not seem to be easily applicable and sensitive enough, especially in the case of deep lying and small cracks. 

The values of x and s vary from sample set to sample set. However, as N increases, they may be expected to become more and more stable. Their limiting values, for very large N, are numbers characteristic of the frequency distribution, and are referred to as the population mean and the population variance, respectively. 

To predict the properties of a population on the basis of a sample, it is necessary to know something about the population s expected distribution around its central value. The distribution of a population can be represented by plotting the frequency of occurrence of individual values as a function of the values themselves. Such plots are called prohahility distrihutions. Unfortunately, we are rarely able to calculate the exact probability distribution for a chemical system. In fact, the probability distribution can take any shape, depending on the nature of the chemical system being investigated. Fortunately many chemical systems display one of several common probability distributions. Two of these distributions, the binomial distribution and the normal distribution, are discussed next. 

---