Safety perception definition

While it is clear that some people will not accept a definition of safety that is relative, it appears that most people feel safe when they are convinced that risks to their well-being are sufficiently low, even if not completely absent. (There are some dramatic and important qualifications on this conclusion, as we shall see in the later section concerning people s perceptions of risk. While for the most part people accept that the condition of safety is not equivalent to the condition of being completely risk-free, most people do not perceive risk as simply a matter of probability, as do the experts. This intriguing and well-documented fact complicates greatly the public dialogue on matters of risk.)... 

Numerous deflnitions have been proposed of safety culture (e.g. Flin et al. 2000 Pidgeon and O Leary 1994 Zohar 1980). The most widely accepted definition is the one proposed by the Advisory Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations (ACSNI 1993 23) safety culture is the product of individual and group values, attitudes, perceptions, competencies and patterns of behaviour that determine the... 

Safety An individual s perception of risk. Two alternative definitions are safety is a state of mind whereby workers are made aware of the possibility of injury at all times (from Ted Davies, a mining safety expert, derived from Osborne, Canada), and safety is a state in which the risk of harm (to persons) or damage is limited to an acceptable level (Australian Standard 4801). Some would argue for tolerable not acceptable , saying no risk is acceptable. 

The above definitions and the tenor of the report are based on an approach to the subject of risk from the standpoint of the natural scientist. TTie view of the social scientist had more influence in the subsequent report that places greater emphasis on the perception of risk by individuals and the public at large, especially when overlaid by media involvement. Most managers do not have the time to consider what some will view as the esoteric components of risk. The Health and Safety Executive offer the following definition of hazard and risk ... 

Because safety is such a strong meme (everyone knows the definition of safety, right ), we normally do not define the term, assuming everyone knows what we mean. However, safety may or may not have the same coimotation with individuals, groups, or organizations. If it is to have influence and replicate itself in other minds, it must be clearly defined. We discussed this in Chapter 1, The Perception of Safety. ... 

Past experiences over the years clearly indicate that there is a definite need for maintaining the situation awareness of workers at a high level for insuring the safety of their operations in many industrial sectors. As per Reference 5, situation awareness may be expressed as the perception of the elements in the environment within the framework of a volume of time and space, the comprehension of their proper meanings, and the projection of their status in the near future. The following are the main elements of situation awareness [5] ... 

Others have dehned a safety culture as the product of individual and group values, attitudes, perceptions, competencies, and patterns of behavior that determine the commitment to, and the style and proficiency of, an organization s health and safety management (HSC, 1993, p. 23). Another widely used definition of safety culture, developed by the Advisory Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations, identi-hes it as the product of individual and group values, attitudes, perceptions, competencies, and patterns of behavior that determine the commitment to, and the style and proficiency of, an organization s health and safety management. Organizations with a positive safety culture are characterized by communications founded on mutual trust, shared perceptions of the importance of safety, and confidence in the efficacy of preventive measures. 

The shift in how paradigm is commonly defined does contain an important lesson. When we adopt and use new definitions, our mindset or perception changes. In other words, as I indicated in the previous chapter, we act ourselves into a new way of thinking or perceiving. This is a primary theme of this book. When employees get involved in more effective procedures to control safety, they develop a more constructive and optimistic attitude toward safety and the achievement of a Total Safety Culture. Let us consider the shifts in principles, procedures, beliefs, attitudes, or perceptions needed for the three new Es—ergonomics, empowerment, and evaluation—and for achieving a Total Safety Culture. 

---