Ruthenium complexes substitutions

Asymmetric epoxidation of olefins with ruthenium catalysts based either on chiral porphyrins or on pyridine-2,6-bisoxazoline (pybox) ligands has been reported (Scheme 6.21). Berkessel et al. reported that catalysts 27 and 28 were efficient catalysts for the enantioselective epoxidation of aryl-substituted olefins (Table 6.10) [139]. Enantioselectivities of up to 83% were obtained in the epoxidation of 1,2-dihydronaphthalene with catalyst 28 and 2,6-DCPNO. Simple olefins such as oct-l-ene reacted poorly and gave epoxides with low enantioselectivity. The use of pybox ligands in ruthenium-catalyzed asymmetric epoxidations was first reported by Nishiyama et al., who used catalyst 30 in combination with iodosyl benzene, bisacetoxyiodo benzene [PhI(OAc)2], or TBHP for the oxidation of trons-stilbene [140], In their best result, with PhI(OAc)2 as oxidant, they obtained trons-stilbene oxide in 80% yield and with 63% ee. More recently, Beller and coworkers have reexamined this catalytic system, finding that asymmetric epoxidations could be perfonned with ruthenium catalysts 29 and 30 and 30% aqueous hydrogen peroxide (Table 6.11) [141]. Development of the pybox ligand provided ruthenium complex 31, which turned out to be the most efficient catalyst for asymmetric... 

The pentammine aqua ion [Ru(NH3)j(H20)]2+, best made by zinc amalgam reduction and aquation of [Ru(NH3)5C1]2+, undergoes extensively studied substitution reactions first order in both the ruthenium complex and the incoming ligand (e.g. NH3, py) and is a convenient source of other... 

Complexation via amidinate units was found in ruthenium complexes containing tri- and pentacyclic trifluoromethylaryl-substituted quinoxalines. The complex fragment [(tbbpy)2Ru] (tbbpy = bis(4,4 -di-ferf-butyl-2,2 -bipyridine) has been employed in these compounds which have all been structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction. ... 

Vinyl substituted bipyridine complexes of ruthenium 9 and osmium 10 can be electropolymerized directly onto electrode surfaces The polymerization is initiated and controlled by stepping or cycling the electrode potential between positive and negative values and it is more successful when the number of vinyl groups in the complexes is increased, as in 77 A series of new vinyl substituted terpyridinyl ligands have recently been synthesized whose iron, cobalt and ruthenium complexes 72 are also susceptible to electropolymerization... 

The first example of an asymmetric reduction of C=N bonds proceeding via DKR was reported in 2005 by Lassaletta et al. In this process, the transfer hydrogenation of 2-substituted bicyclic and monocyclic ketimines could be accomplished via DKR by using a HCO2H/TEA mixture as the hydrogen source and a chiral ruthenium complex including TsDPEN ligand,... 

Besides ruthenium porphyrins (vide supra), several other ruthenium complexes were used as catalysts for asymmetric epoxidation and showed unique features 114,115 though enantioselectivity is moderate, some reactions are stereospecific and treats-olefins are better substrates for the epoxidation than are m-olcfins (Scheme 20).115 Epoxidation of conjugated olefins with the Ru (salen) (37) as catalyst was also found to proceed stereospecifically, with high enantioselectivity under photo-irradiation, irrespective of the olefmic substitution pattern (Scheme 21).116-118 Complex (37) itself is coordinatively saturated and catalytically inactive, but photo-irradiation promotes the dissociation of the apical nitrosyl ligand and makes the complex catalytically active. The wide scope of this epoxidation has been attributed to the unique structure of (37). Its salen ligand adopts a deeply folded and distorted conformation that allows the approach of an olefin of any substitution pattern to the intermediary oxo-Ru species.118 2,6-Dichloropyridine IV-oxide (DCPO) and tetramethylpyrazine /V. V -dioxide68 (TMPO) are oxidants of choice for this epoxidation. 

Furthermore, the utilization of preformed films of polypyrrole functionalized by suitable monomeric ruthenium complexes allows the circumvention of problems due to the moderate stability of these complexes to aerial oxidation when free in solution. A similar CO/HCOO-selectivity with regards to the substitution of the V-pyrrole-bpy ligand by an electron-with-drawing group is retained in those composite materials.98 The related osmium-based redox-active polymer [Os°(bpy)(CO)2] was prepared, and is also an excellent electrocatalyst for the reduction of C02 in aqueous media.99 However, the selectivity toward CO vs. HCOO- production is lower. 

As invented by Wender,196,197 a variant of the second transformation can take place if the alkene partner is substituted by a participating group such as a strained cyclopropyl or a cyclobutanone (in the case of a 1,6-diene).198 The whole process, which mainly relies on the use of rhodium or ruthenium complexes,1 9 results in the formal... 

Kondo and Watanabe developed allylations of various types of aldehydes and oximes by using nucleophilic (7r-allyl)ruthenium(ll) complexes of type 154 bearing carbon monoxide ligands (Equation (29)).345 These 73-allyl-ruthenium complexes 154 are ambiphilic reagents and the presence of the carbon monoxide ligands proved to be essential to achieve catalytic allylation reactions. Interestingly, these transformations occur with complete regioselectivity only the more substituted allylic terminus adds to the aldehyde. 

The greater reactivity of terminal olefins compared to their more hindered di-and tri-substituted counterparts became evident in the model studies (Sect. 2.2.1) and in the total synthesis of epothilones A, B and E (Sects. 2.2.2-2.2.4). Suitably positioned disubstituted olefins can, however, participate in RCM reactions employing the molybdenum initiator 1 [19], and this is demonstrated in the total synthesis of epothilone B (5) (Sect. 2.2.3). As expected this transformation proved impossible using the ruthenium complex 3. 

For the synthesis of carbohydrate-substituted block copolymers, it might be expected that the addition of acid to the polymerization reactions would result in a rate increase. Indeed, the ROMP of saccharide-modified monomers, when conducted in the presence of para-toluene sulfonic acid under emulsion conditions, successfully yielded block copolymers [52]. A key to the success of these reactions was the isolation of the initiated species, which resulted in its separation from the dissociated phosphine. The initiated ruthenium complex was isolated by starting the polymerization in acidic organic solution, from which the reactive species precipitated. The solvent was removed, and the reactive species was washed with additional degassed solvent. The polymerization was completed under emulsion conditions (in water and DTAB), and additional blocks were generated by the sequential addition of the different monomers. This method of polymerization was successful for both the mannose/galactose polymer and for the mannose polymer with the intervening diol sequence (Fig. 16A,B). 

The chemistry of these compounds has not been investigated in detail. Scheme 12 summarizes some of the chemistry that has been established for the ruthenium complex RugClCO) (192). In general, the octahedral metal-carbido skeleton is maintained, substitution reactions occurring with phosphine, phosphites, and arsine ligands. Base attack leads to the production of the anion [Ru8C(CO)16P, which is... 

Aromatics occur as ligands in ruthenium complexes that are used for hydrogen transfer reaction, i.e. two hydrogen atoms are transferred from a donor molecule, e.g. an alcohol, to a ketone, producing another alcohol. Especially the enantiospecific variant has become important, see Chapter 4.4. The substitution pattern of the aromatic compound influences the enantioselectivity of the reaction. 

A similar study was performed on ruthenium-modified myoglobins, in which AG variations were obtained by changing the nature of the ruthenium complex covalently bound to the protein, and by substituting a porphyrin to the heme [137]. It is gratifying to observe that, in spite of the rather heterogeneous character of this series, the study leads to an estimation of 1.9 to 2.4 eV for A which is consistent with the value 2.3 eV derived in section 3.2.1 from temperature dependent experiments. Satisfactory agreement between the results given by the two methods is also observed in the case of ruthenium-modified cytochrome c [138]. 

As already mentioned earlier, the ruthenium complex [Ru(bdmpza) Cl(PPh3)2l (24) easily releases one of the two phosphine ligands and allows the substitution not only of a chlorido but also of a triphenylphosphine ligand for K -coordinating carboxylato or 2-oxocarboxylato ligands (58). The purpose of these studies was to find structural ruthenium models for the active site of 2-OG dependent iron enzymes, since ruthenium(II) complexes are low spin and thus suitable for NMR characterization, whereas ferrous iron complexes with NJV,0-ligands are often difficult to investigate, due to their... 

---