Ruedenberg localization method

For such localizations to be effective in the present context, those orbital symmetry constraints that would prevent maximal localization in larger molecules must be abandoned. For instance, in the NCCN molecule, Ciy symmetry can be preserved during the localization process, but not left-right mirror symmetry. We have used Raffenetti s (55) version of the Edmiston-Ruedenberg localization method 54). 

The first order electric moments obtained for bond and lone pair electron densities using Edmiston-Ruedenberg localization method are summarized in Table 4 and the geometry of the studied systems are presented in Table 3. The origin of (r) is taken at the corresponding heavy atom nucleus. The values... 

Interestingly, and probably due to a very exciting connection between the Fermi-hole and the localized orbitals [28], various localization methods result in rather similar localized orbitals, except for the description of double bonds by a o- and 7r-orbital-pair or two equivalent r (banana) bonds. Boys localization gives r orbitals, while the Edmiston-Ruedenberg and the popula-... 

A recently often used practical method is that of proposed by Pipek and Mezey [26], Their intrinsic localization is based on a special mathematical measure of localization. It uses no external criteria to. define a priori orbitals. The method is similar to the Edmiston-Ruedenberg s localization method in the a-n separation of the orbitals while it works as economically as the Boys procedure. For the application of their localization algorithm, the knowledge of atomic overlap integrals is sufficient. This feature allows the adoption of their algorithm for both ab initio and semiempirical methods. The implementation of die procedure in existing program systems is easy, and this property makes the Pipek-Mezey s method very attractive for practical use. 

Given these encouraging preliminary results, further investigation of the effect of SIC on reaction barriers is warranted. For more complicated reactions, it is likely that the initial scheme used here will need to be elaborated, either by going to better localization methods (e.g. Edmiston-Ruedenberg localization [79]), or by incorporating the SIC term in the self-consistent procedure, which is more expensive. 

Numerical LMOs of this work are determined by the natural localized-molecular-orbital (NLMO) method A. E. Reed and F. Weinhold, J. Chem. Phys. 83 (1985), 1736. The LMOs determined by other methods (e.g., C. Edmiston and K. Ruedenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34 [1963], 457 and J. M. Foster and S. F. Boys, Rev. Mod. Phys. 32 [1960], 300) are rather similar, and could be taken as equivalent for present purposes. 

The final step is the orbital optimization for the truncated SDTQ-CI expansion. We used the Jacobi-rotation-based MCSCF method of Ivanic and Ruedenberg (55) for that purpose. Table 1 contains the results for the FORS 1 and FORS2 wavefiinctions of HNO and NCCN, obtained using cc-pVTZ basis sets (51). In all cases, the configurations were based on split-localized orbitals. For each case, four energies are listed corresponding to (i) whether the full or the truncated SDTQ-CI expansion was used and (ii) whether the split-localized orbitals were those deduced from the SD naturals orbitals or were eventually MCSCF optimized. It is seen that... 

The recent developments in generalized Valence Bond (GVB) theory have been reviewed by Goddard and co-workers,13 and also the use of natural orbitals in theoretical chemistry,14 15 and the accuracy of computed one-electron properties.18 The Xa method has been reviewed by Johnson,17 and Hurley has discussed high-accuracy calculations on small molecules.18 Several other reviews of interest have appeared in Advances in Quantum Chemistry.17 Localized orbital theory has been reviewed by England, Salmon, and Ruedenberg,19 and the bonding in transition-metal complexes discussed by Brown et a/.20 Finally, the recent developments in computational quantum chemistry have been reviewed by Hall.21... 

One may re-define the active orbitals utilizing the invariance of the active orbital space. In the orthogonal CASVB method, the LMOs constructed by Boys localization procedure are used that is, active orbitals are transformed so as to have the minimum sum of expectation values. If the active orbitals are defined appropriately, the LMOs obtained nearly always turn out to be localized on a single atomic center with small localization tails on to neighboring atoms. In the non-orthogonal CASVB case, the atomic-like orbitals are constructed by Ruedenberg s projected localization procedure. 

As with the smaller compounds, reliable computational descriptions of methyl phenyl sulfoxide excited states are not available. Ground state computations are easily accessible for molecules of this size. At the RHF/6-31G(d,p) level, the HOMO is 7t with regard to the SO bond but delocalized throughout the whole n-system. The next two descending orbitals are localized on the phenyl and SO, respectively. (The sulfur lone pair is the HOMO-2 when the valence bond orbitals are approximated by the Edmiston-Ruedenberg method.) While the LUMO is extensively delocalized, the LUMO-fl is entirely localized on the phenyl ring. 

Calculation of the Edmiston-Ruedenberg energy-localized MOs is very time consuming. Boys proposed a method to find localized MOs that is computationally much faster than the Edmiston-Ruedenberg method and that gives similar results in most cases see D. A. Kleier, J. Chem. Phys., 61,3905 (1974). 

There are many methods of localization. The most important ones are the projection method, the method of minimum distance between two electrons from the same orbital (Boys approach), and the method of maximum interaction of electrons from the same orbital (Ruedenberg approach). 

Calculation of the Edmiston-Ruedenberg energy-localized MOs is very time consuming. Boys (and Foster) proposed a method to find localized MOs that is computationally much faster than the Edmiston-Ruedenberg method and that gives similar results in most cases see D. A. Kleier, J. Chem. Phys., 61, 3905 (1974). The Boys method defines the LMOs as those that maximize the sum of the squares of the distances between the centroids of charge of all pairs of occupied LMOs. The centroid of charge of orbital is defined as the point at (xc,yc>Zc), where Xc = ff>i x tf>i), yc = (I y I ). Zc = 4>i z (t>i) Tjj is, the distance between the centroids of LMOs i and j, the Boys LMOs maximize 2j>, 2, rfj. 

It is also possible to localize the MOs by localization procedures. We have shifted the emphasis from previous localization procedures by Boys and Ruedenberg to a new localization procedure by Pipek and Mezey. It maximizes the population localization and is suitable for ab initio and semiempirical methods. 

The method described above is essentially that due to Edmiston and Ruedenberg (1963). Another commonly used localization criterion (Boys and Foster, 1960) is that of maximum separation of the centroids of the transformed orbitals, and other methods have also been successfully applied (see e.g. Gilbert, 1964 Magnasco and Perico, 1967 McWeeny and Del Re, 1968). 

---