Rubber elasticity modulus

Figure 1. Stress relaxation curves for three different extension ratios. Uncross-linked high-vinyl polybutadiene with a weight average molecular weight of 2 million and a reference temperature of 283 K. G is the apparent rubber elasticity modulus calculated from classical affine theory. (Solid line is data from Ref. 1).

Rubber Elasticity Modulus of Interpenetrating Heteropolymer Networks... 

This is a theoretical study on the entanglement architecture and mechanical properties of an ideal two-component interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) composed of flexible chains (Fig. la). In this system molecular interaction between different polymer species is accomplished by the simultaneous or sequential polymerization of the polymeric precursors [1 ]. Chains which are thermodynamically incompatible are permanently interlocked in a composite network due to the presence of chemical crosslinks. The network structure is thus reinforced by chain entanglements trapped between permanent junctions [2,3]. It is evident that, entanglements between identical chains lie further apart in an IPN than in a one-component network (Fig. lb) and entanglements associating heterogeneous polymers are formed in between homopolymer junctions. In the present study the density of the various interchain associations in the composite network is evaluated as a function of the properties of the pure network components. This information is used to estimate the equilibrium rubber elasticity modulus of the IPN. 

Natural rubber. On heating from -50°C to -2S°C the modulus falls abruptly (glass-to-rubber relaxation) and levels off at the rubber elastic modulus specific to this rather high degree of cross-linking (G 1.2 MPa). In the rubbeiy state the modulus increases with temperature (eqn 3.30). 

We next wish to examine the qualitative implications of the modulus eq. 2.12. For /-O we get G(0) kT CpN. The quantity CpN is the concentration of Rouse bonds in the system, and G(0) may be related to the rubber elasticity modulus result viz., each bond contributes about kT to the modulus. Of course, eq. 2.12 cannot be taken literally back to /-O, but represents a law appropriate after initial fast conformational relaxation processes. 

Tackifying resins enhance the adhesion of non-polar elastomers by improving wettability, increasing polarity and altering the viscoelastic properties. Dahlquist [31 ] established the first evidence of the modification of the viscoelastic properties of an elastomer by adding resins, and demonstrated that the performance of pressure-sensitive adhesives was related to the creep compliance. Later, Aubrey and Sherriff [32] demonstrated that a relationship between peel strength and viscoelasticity in natural rubber-low molecular resins blends existed. Class and Chu [33] used the dynamic mechanical measurements to demonstrate that compatible resins with an elastomer produced a decrease in the elastic modulus at room temperature and an increase in the tan <5 peak (which indicated the glass transition temperature of the resin-elastomer blend). Resins which are incompatible with an elastomer caused an increase in the elastic modulus at room temperature and showed two distinct maxima in the tan <5 curve. 

Langley, N.R. and Polmanteer, K.E., Relation of elastic modulus to crosslink and entanglement concentrations in rubber networks. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed., 12(6), 1023-1034 (1974). 

An increase in the swelling degree usually results in lowering elastic modulus. According to the rubber elasticity theory [116-118] the shear modulus of the gel G can be expressed as ... 

Small deformations of the polymers will not cause undue stretching of the randomly coiled chains between crosslinks. Therefore, the established theory of rubber elasticity [8, 23, 24, 25] is applicable if the strands are freely fluctuating. At temperatures well above their glass transition, the molecular strands are usually quite mobile. Under these premises the Young s modulus of the rubberlike polymer in thermal equilibrium is given by ... 

The elastic stress curve in figure perfectly follows elastic strain [2]. This constant is the elastic modulus of the material. In this idealized example, this would be equal to Young s modulus. Here at this point of maximum stretch, the viscous stress is not a maximum, it is zero. This state is called Newton s law of viscosity, which states that, viscous stress is proportional to strain rate. Rubber has some properties of a liquid. At the point when the elastic band is fully stretched and is about to return, its velocity or strain rate is zero, and therefore its viscous stress is also zero. 

Resilin and elastin have relatively high extensibility and resilience, but as compared to the collagen and the silks, the proteins sacrifice stiffness (elastic modulus) and strength (see Table 2). Collagen and dragUne sflk are much stiffer materials, but lack the extensibility that is characteristic of the rubber-like proteins. On the other hand, the mussel byssus fibers and the viscid silk have the extensibility of resilin and elastin, but lack the resilience [208]. 

According to the rubber elasticity theory ( 1, 2), the equilibrium shear modulus, Ge, is proportional to the concentration of EANC s and an additional contribution due to trapped entanglements may also be considered ... 

Since the excellent work of Moore and Watson (6, who cross-linked natural rubber with t-butylperoxide, most workers have assumed that physical cross-links contribute to the equilibrium elastic properties of cross-linked elastomers. This idea seems to be fully confirmed in work by Graessley and co-workers who used the Langley method on radiation cross-linked polybutadiene (.7) and ethylene-propylene copolymer (8) to study trapped entanglements. Two-network results on 1,2-polybutadiene (9.10) also indicate that the equilibrium elastic contribution from chain entangling at high degrees of cross-linking is quantitatively equal to the pseudoequilibrium rubber plateau modulus (1 1.) of the uncross-linked polymer. 

Ronca and Allegra (12) and Flory ( 1, 2) assume explicitly in their new rubber elasticity theory that trapped entanglements make no contribution to the equilibrium elastic modulus. It is proposed that chain entangling merely serves to suppress junction fluctuations at small deformations, thereby making the network deform affinely at small deformations. This means that the limiting value of the front factor is one for complete suppression of junction fluctuations. 

The two-network method has been carefully examined. All the previous two-network results were obtained in simple extension for which the Gaussian composite network theory was found to be inadequate. Results obtained on composite networks of 1,2-polybutadiene for three different types of strain, namely equibiaxial extension, pure shear, and simple extension, are discussed in the present paper. The Gaussian composite network elastic free energy relation is found to be adequate in equibiaxial extension and possibly pure shear. Extrapolation to zero strain gives the same result for all three types of strain The contribution from chain entangling at elastic equilibrium is found to be approximately equal to the pseudo-equilibrium rubber plateau modulus and about three times larger than the contribution from chemical cross-links. 

---