Risk management modelling

He is equally scathing about estimates of consequence. He believes that the consequences of events such as Deepwater Horizon or Fukushima—Daiichi will always be much more serious that estimated in the risk management models. 

The most important action a carrier should consider is the development and implementation of a security plan. A risk management model can be used to assess security risks and develop appropriate measvires to reduce or eliminate risk. 

Most risk management models utilize the following steps ... 

Cabero J, Baillo A., Cerisola S., Ventosa M., Garcia A., Reran R, Relano G. - A Medium-Term Integrated Risk Management Model for a Hydrothermal generation Company, IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, vol. 20, no. 3, august 2005, pg. 1379—1387... 

Olson D. L., Wu D., 2011, Risk Management Models for Supply Chain A Scenario Analysis of Outsourcing to China, Supply Chain Management An International Journal, 16(6), pp. 401 08. 

Widiin the structures of our risk management model in section 2 the obvious ways in which miscalculation can occur are ... 

Berse K, Bendimerad F, Cruz J, Dagh W, Deocariza M, Khazai B, Lopez IG, Puhnano N, Seva V (2009) Desk review of international disaster risk management models and tools intended for local institutional application. GFDRR, p 118, Makati City, Philippines... 

Lonsdale C 1999 Effectively managing vertical supply relationships a risk management model for outsourcing. Supply Chain Management An International Journal 4 176-83. 

Tummala V.M.R. and Leung Y.H., (1995) A Risk Management Model to Assess Safety and Reliability Risks , International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 13, No. 8, pp. 53-62. 

REIST Aerosol Science and Technology, Second Edition RHINE, TUCKER Modeling of Gas-Fired Furnaces and Boilers and Other Industrial Heating Processes ROSSITER Waste Minimization Through Process Design SAMDANI Safety and Risk Management Tools and Techniques in the CPI... 

API Publ 761, Model Risk Management Plan Guidance for Exploration and Production Facilities—Guidance for Complying with EPA s RMP Rule (40 Code of Federal Regulations 68), 2nd ed., August 1997... 

DanieI A. Crowl, Consequence Modeling for the EPA Risk Management Plan (RMP), Process Safety Progress (Spring 1997), pp. 1-5. 

Rasmussen J., 1997. Risk management in a dynamic society a modelling problem, Safety Science Vol. 27No. 2/3, pp. 183-213. 

Such a risk management framework should be in place prior to the initiation of closure activities and should be a dynamic process. The constituent risk models should be updated as new information becomes available and should be responsive to changing and emerging hazards. 

Therefore, in this approach, we develop Risk Model III as a reformulation of Risk Model II by employing the mean-absolute deviation (MAD), in place of variance, as the measure of operational risk imposed by the recourse costs to handle the same three factors of uncertainty (prices, demands, and yields). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such application of MAD, a widely-used metric in the area of system identification and process control, for risk management in refinery planning. 

The assessment endpoint should be not only measurable (at least potentially) but also modelable. Defining a modelable endpoint is likely to require close discussion between an assessor (who knows what they can model) and a risk manager (who knows what they want to protect). Sometimes the assessment endpoint is only indirectly related to the management goal, for example, if the assessment endpoint is a risk to individuals, but the aim is to protect population sustainability. In such cases, qualitative inference will be required to interpret the assessment result. This inference will need to be done jointly by the risk assessor and risk manager. It is likely to involve substantial uncertainty, which will have to be taken into account qualitatively when producing a narrative description of the assessment outcome. This step should be identified as part of the conceptual model. 

The analysis plan should specify not only how the analysis will be conducted, but also how the results will be presented. Indeed, the way results will be communicated will usually influence the choice of both model structure and analysis method and is ultimately driven by the information needs of risk managers and other stakeholders and their management goals (see Figure 2.2). Careful advance planning for the communication of results is especially important for probabilistic assessments because they are more complex than deterministic assessments and less familiar to most audiences. It may be beneficial to present probabilistic and deterministic assessments together, to facilitate familiarization with the newer approaches. 

---