Risk assessment II applications

I believe it was Mark Twain who quipped, when asked what he thought of the music of Richard Wagner, that It s not as bad as it sounds. Risk assessment might be similarly described. 

Difluoromuckone (DFM) has been found to increase the risk of cancer in several studies involving experimental animals. Investigations involving 

This Statement could no doubt be much improved upon, but, based on what we have said in the last chapter, it is certainly much closer to what risk assessors know than those cited earlier. 

Risk is the probability that some harmful event will occur. What is the probability that certain types of cancer will develop in populations exposed to aflatoxin in peanut products or benzene from gasoline What is the likelihood that workers exposed to lead will develop nervous system disorders  

Because it is a probability, risk is expressed as a fraction, without units. It takes values from 0 (absolute certainty that there is no risk. 

---

On the other hand, in part II of this volume, a set of case studies are introduced. The application of the selected methodologies inside each one of the foresaid disciplines (e.g., risk assessment, life cycle assessment) to specific cases and countries is presented here. The results of such application are discussed as well as their reliability. Toxicological studies in Italy, risk assessment of electronic waste in China, or disposal of bearing lamps in India are some examples of selected scenarios. 

Preliminary Hazard Analysis Description. The incorporation of this information into a PHA entry is shown as Table II. This entry describes the proposed actions needed to eliminate or control the hazard (column 6), the risk assessment code assigned after controls (column 7), and the identification of applicable codes and standards (column 8). 

The EU Risk Assessment (Part I—Environment was completed in 2005) identifies a risk of accumulation in the food chain, and suggests risk reduction measures for all applications. Part II—Human Health are under evaluation... 

David RM, Clewell HJ, Gentry PR, Covington TR, Morgott DA, Marino DJ. 2006. Revised assessment of cancer risk to dichloromethane. II. Application of probabilistic methods to cancer risk determinations. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 45 55-65. 

Ecotoxicological effects, such as acute or sublethal responses, can be related to both external and internal concentrations. The former is still used in risk assessment procedures, while the latter has recently been investigated for its potential use in risk assessment. External concentrations may vary by many orders of magnitude for different chemicals, even when they exert the same mechanism of action. The variability in internal concentrations is much smaller. The assumptions which form the basis for a broad applicability of the internal concentration, namely that for a given mechanism of action, i) there would be no intraspecies variation, ii) there would be no interspecies variation, and iii) there would be no time or concentration dependency, have been studied. It was found that no assumption was completely valid. However, given the magnitude of variability found, these variations are much less than those which are found for external concentrations, while some of the reasons for the variations in the internal effect concentrations may be similar for the variation in external effect concentrations. 

ABSTRACT This paper has introduced an approach that can simultaneously minimize the possible occurrence of two types of errors, type I (or a) and type II (or )9), by setting up a threshold value that is applied to the design of slopes with treatment. The two types of errors are involved in the stabiUty assessment of the treated slopes. Type I error results in missing a prediction of a slope that actually is not stable and fails. In contrast. Type li leads to a false alarm of a failure of a slope that is supposed to be stable and not to fail. Minimization of these errors plays an important role in m ing an accurate risk assessment or a successful prediction of slope stability. For purpose of application, a case study has been also introduced in the paper to show how to employ the probabilistic approach step by step. 

SESSION II Risk Theory and Risk Analysis for Landslides. [1] Landslide Risk Management concepts and framework and examples (2.5 h) [2] Deterministic and Probabilistic models for slope stability evaluation (2 h) [3] Introduction to modelling of catastrophic landslide events (2 h) [4] Empirical models for travel distance (1.5 h) [5] Application examples of probabilistic methods and semi quantitative methods for landslide hazard zonation (2h) [6] Landslide Frequency Assessment (1.5 h) [7] Different components of vulnerability to landslides. Prevention and long term management of landslides (3.5 h) [8] Case Studies coal waste dump risk assessment, example from motorway in La Reunion Island, Aknes Rock slope in Norway (2 h) [9] Application of QRA to other geotechnical problems Internal erosion of dams, crater lake hazard (1.5 h) [10] Advanced numerical models initiation of landslides, propagation of sediments/climate change effects (3.5 h). 

In most cases a three tier approach is adopted, as shown in Fig. II/4.2.3-1. Initially, a qualitative or semiquantitative approach is taken to assess the risk and screen it. When risks are in a high risk zone or there is the possibility of a major accident event, then quantitative risk assessments are carried out to prescribe necessary control measures. It is quite common that in many cases a combined approach is necessary to justify consequence analysis. Mostly, when a quantitative approach is undertaken, prior preliminary analysis is done. From the diagram it is seen that whenever all replies to the queries shown in the diagram after qualitative analysis are NO, then the action stops. If any reply is YES, then the next level of analysis is carried out. A similar approach is applicable for semiquantitative and quantitative analyses (Fig. II/4.2.3-1). 

Tables 4 and 5 summarize the general applications of mutagenesis assays. Phase I involves utilization of the assays as primary detection, prioritization, and risk-assessment methods, and Phase II illustrates their application as ancillary tests for quality control and occupational monitoring.

Oncoproteomics is the systematic application of proteomic technologies to oncology research [60], Diagnostic proteomics concentrates on differential display comparisons of protein (peptide) concentrations in plasma or urine in health and disease with the following objectives (i) early, rapid, and reliable diagnosis of cancer for timely therapeutic intervention based on identified specific markers (ii) early diagnosis of relapse (iii) early diagnosis for risk assessment to aid prevention. 

---