Rhodium reaction temperature

Although the actual reaction mechanism of hydrosilation is not very clear, it is very well established that the important variables include the catalyst type and concentration, structure of the olefinic compound, reaction temperature and the solvent. used 1,4, J). Chloroplatinic acid (H2PtCl6 6 H20) is the most frequently used catalyst, usually in the form of a solution in isopropyl alcohol mixed with a polar solvent, such as diglyme or tetrahydrofuran S2). Other catalysts include rhodium, palladium, ruthenium, nickel and cobalt complexes as well as various organic peroxides, UV and y radiation. The efficiency of the catalyst used usually depends on many factors, including ligands on the platinum, the type and nature of the silane (or siloxane) and the olefinic compound used. For example in the chloroplatinic acid catalyzed hydrosilation of olefinic compounds, the reactivity is often observed to be proportional to the electron density on the alkene. Steric hindrance usually decreases the rate of... 

The NO + CO reaction is only partially described by the reactions (2)-(7), as there should also be steps to account for the formation of N2O, particularly at lower reaction temperatures. Figure 10.9 shows the rates of CO2, N2O and N2 formation on the (111) surface of rhodium in the form of Arrhenius plots. Comparison with similar measurements on the more open Rh(llO) surface confirms again that the reaction is strongly structure sensitive. As N2O is undesirable, it is important to know under what conditions its formation is minimized. First, the selectivity to N2O, expressed as the ratio given in Eq. (7), decreases drastically at the higher temperatures where the catalyst operates. Secondly, real three-way catalysts contain rhodium particles in the presence of CeO promoters, and these appear to suppress N2O formation [S.H. Oh, J. Catal. 124 (1990) 477]. Finally, N2O undergoes further reaction with CO to give N2 and CO2, which is also catalyzed by rhodium. 

A method has been developed for the continuous removal and reuse of a homogeneous rhodium hydroformylation catalyst. This is done using solvent mixtures that become miscible at reaction temperature and phase separate at lower temperatures. Such behavior is referred to as thermomorphic, and it can be used separate the expensive rhodium catalysts from the aldehydes before they are distilled. In this process, the reaction mixture phase separates into an organic phase that contains the aldehyde product and an aqueous phase that contains the rhodium catalyst. The organic phase is separated and sent to purification, and the aqueous rhodium catalyst phase is simply recycled. 

Since these mixtures are immiscible at room temperature but miscible at the higher reaction temperature, there is excellent contact between the rhodium catalyst and the olefin when the reaction is carried out, increasing the reaction rate by orders of magnitude. After the reaction is complete, the reaction mixture is cooled and the phases completely separate. The product can be simply recovered by decantation and the catalyst can be recycled (Fignre 28.1). 

The products of the rhodium-catalyzed hydroformylation were responsive to the reaction temperatures and, to a lesser degree, to the reaction pressure, as shown in Tables XXI-XXII. 

Of the three catalytic systems so far recognized as being capable of giving fast reaction rates for methanol carbonylation—namely, iodide-promoted cobalt, rhodium, and iridium—two are operated commercially on a large scale. The cobalt and rhodium processes manifest some marked differences in the reaction area (4) (see Table I). The lower reactivity of the cobalt system requires high reaction temperatures. Very high partial pressures of carbon monoxide are then required in the cobalt system to... 

Extensive investigations in our laboratories on the deactivation of rhodium and iridium catalysts has shown there to be a number of different mechanisms involved. Both, rhodium and iridium catalysts are generally less stable at higher temperatures, and have more labile ligands than their ruthenium counterparts. All of the catalysts are affected by pH, but the ruthenium catalysts seem to be more readily deactivated by acid. Indeed, these reactions are often quenched with acetic acid, whilst stronger acids are used to quench the rhodium reactions. Each of the catalysts can be deactivated by product inhibition, the ruthenium catalyst with aromatic substrates such as phenylethanol, and the rhodium and iridium ones by bidentate chelating products. 

The regio- and diastereoselective rhodium-catalyzed sequential process, involving allylic alkylation of a stabilized carbon or heteroatom nucleophile 51, followed by a PK reaction, utilizing a single catalyst was also described (Scheme 11.14). Alkylation of an allylic carbonate 53 was accomplished in a regioselective manner at 30 °C using a j-acidic rhodium(I) catalyst under 1 atm CO. The resulting product 54 was then subjected in situ to an elevated reaction temperature to facilitate the PK transformation. 

Our initial objective, in this investigation, had been to design a useful chiral auxihary. We were pleased to find that naphthylborneol 31, upon optimization of the catalyst and the reaction temperature, served effectively. Until useful chiral catalysts are developed, naphthylborneol 31 will be of significant practical value for directing the absolute course of cyclopentane construction by rhodium-mediated intramolecular C-H insertion. 

The discovery and use of fluorophosphites and chlorophosphites as trivalent phosphorus ligands in the rhodium catalyzed, low-pressure hydroformylation reaction are described. The hydroformylation reaction with halophosphite ligands has been demonstrated with terminal and internal olefins. For the hydroformylation of propylene, the linear to branched ratio of the butyraldehyde product shows a strong dependency on the ligand to rhodium molar ratios, the reaction temperature, and the carbon monoxide partial pressure. 

Before proceeding to a more detailed description of the effects of various solvents and promoters on catalyst activity and stability, it should be noted that the responses described above are possibly, or even probably, influenced by solvents and promoters. The responses shown, however, appear to be generally characteristic of these rhodium-containing systems. It is apparent that the rate of product formation is significantly accelerated by increases in reaction temperature. Higher temperatures, however, can bring about catalyst instability unless the pressure is simultaneously increased. Higher... 

The general behavior of rhodium catalysts with respect to stability thus appears to be similar to that seen for cobalt catalysts an inverse relationship between carbon monoxide partial pressure and reaction temperature is apparent. Stability decreases rapidly with increasing temperature, and raising the pressure tends to improve catalyst stability. It is not certain whether the adverse effects of increasing the H2/CO ratio are merely the result of a decreased CO partial pressure, or whether increased hydrogen partial pressure induces catalyst instability. 

A few years ago, a new class of ligands namely the sulfonated phosphites (for examples see Table 7, 132, 133) was described.283 287 They show remarkable stabilities in water compared to conventional phosphites such as P(OPh)3 and rhodium catalysts modified with 132 exhibited much higher catalytic activities in the hydroformylation of 1-tetradecene than conventional Rh/P(OPh)3 or Ph/PPh3 catalysts even at lower reaction temperatures.285,286 Sulfonated phosphite ligands may play a role in the emerging field of biphasic catalysis in ionic liquids15 22 or in combination with membrane separation of the metal complexes of these bulky ligands. 

---