Reviewing performance, safety reviews results

Each type of lithium battery requires slightly different processing/handling. The specific reasons for differing processes may be due to the environmental concerns of the materials within the batteries, the size of the batteries, the reactivity of the batteries, safety concerns, differing states of charge of the batteries, and/or different materials to be recovered. An analysis of each battery type should be performed and the results should be reviewed for chemical compatibility of the process, flammability, toxicity, reactivity, safety, and for environmental concerns. 

On the GM debate and biosafety research, a review of results performed under the European Commission supervision ( EC-sponsored Research on Safety of Genetically Modified Organisms , edited by C. Kessler and I. Economidis) is available also online at the EU-website http //europa.eu.int/ comm/research/quality-of-life/gmo/. An update on current research in food safety, nutrition and food-related disease might be found in the websites of the World Health Organization, http //www.who.int/fsf/GMfood/index.htm, and of the UK Food Standards Agency, http //www.foodstandards.gov.uk/. 

As a result of this investigation, all attempts should be made to remove the packing prior to performing hot work. If hot work is required, a thorough safety and fire protection review should be performed (including the prevention of and response to metal fires). 

Within the FDA s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, the Office of Food Additive Safety administers premarket approval processes for new direct food additives and food additives that are components of food contact materials. Most food contact materials are regulated via the food contact notification process and authorization of new food contact materials is administered by the Division of Food Contact Notifications (see Chapter 2 for further information). The notifier has the primary responsibility to demonstrate the safety of the proposed use of the food contact material. Review scientists within FDA perform a fair evaluation of the data in a food contact notification, as well as other relevant information, to determine if the knowledge base supports the finding with reasonable certainty that no harm will result from the intended use of the food additive. FDA maintains a number of public online listings that include useful information... 

People must be held accountable for results. If action items are not completed in a timely basis, there needs to be an analysis of why and a plan for improvement. If standard operating procedures (SOP) checklists are not used rigorously, there needs to be an analysis of why with appropriate consequences (punishment should be a last resort). There should be reasons why objectives are not met and those barriers need to be removed. Individual sites within an organization may establish specific process safety goals, activities, and behavior on individual performance contracts, which are reflected in the annual performance review process that links to merit pay raises, bonuses, advancement opportunities, and the like. Consequences for poor process safety performance must not be limited to supervisors or facility managers but must be a factor in performance appraisals throughout the organization. 

Shipment Points and Receiving Locations Mitigate Optimize suppiy chain through a reduction in miies, reduce intermediate handiing, or use routes/carriers with iower accident rates Supply chain optimization could result in transit closer to sensitive population If new carrier or intermediate storage partners are considered, need to review their safety practices and performance... 

---