Responsibility for consequences

Third, even where it is clear that a particular type of chemical has caused a particular incident of damage, and we can identify who was causally responsible for the existence of that chemical (if not necessarily its presence in a particular location), the first condition, that the conduct transgressed a norm, is often not met. This is because those norms require only that foreseeable consequences are taken into account one is not responsible for consequences that could not have been foreseen. Thus Du Pont, the main manufacturer of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) — non-toxic and non-flammable chemicals that were used as a refrigerant and aerosol propellant for many decades — have not been held to account for the hole in the ozone layer caused by those chemicals because at the time the key decisions to manufacture them were made, in the 1930s, these effects could not have been predicted (Colborn et al, 1996, pp243-245). 

Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information contained in this publication, neither the IAEA nor its Member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from its use. 

This book in no way condones illegal activity It is your responsibility to determine the legality of your actions. Further, because we have no control over the workmanship, materials, tools, methods, or testing procedures employed, we hereby disclaim any responsibility for consequences resulting from the fabrication or compounding of any item described in this book. Ne cannot and will not accept any responsibility for this information and its subsequent use. This book is sold for informational purposes only ... 

Although isothiazole (pK = 1.90) is less basic than thiazole, its rale of quaternization by dinitrophenyl acetate in water at 52°C is approximately 2.5 times higher (447). This deviation from the Bronsted relationship (A log k - 0.ApK, with positive) is interpreted as a consequence of the or effect of the adjacent sulfur lone pair in isothiazole that is responsible for its higher nucleophilicity (448, 449). 

Equation 25 represents the reaction responsible for the removal of uv-B radiation (280—330 nm) that would otherwise reach the earth s surface. There is concern that any process that depletes stratospheric o2one will consequently increase uv-B (in the 293—320 nm region) reaching the surface. Increased uv-B is expected to lead to increased incidence of skin cancer and it could have deleterious effects on certain ecosystems. The first concern over depletion was from NO emissions from a fleet of supersonic transport aircraft that would fly through the stratosphere and cause reactions according to equations 3 and 26 (59) ... 

Ultimately, guidelines such as those above will be taken seriously only if production management carefully configures the alarms. The consequences of excessive and redundant alarms will be felt primarily by those responsible for produc tion operations. Therefore, production management must make adequate resources available for reviewing and analyzing the proposed alarm configurations. 

In the development of new products, optimization of the fermentation medium for titer only often ignores the consequences of the medium properties on subsequent downstream processing steps such as filtration and chromatography. It is imperative, therefore, that there be effective communication and understanding between workers on the upstream and downstream phases of the produc t development if rational trade-offs are to be made to ensure overall optimahty of the process. One example is to make the conscious decision, in collaboration with those responsible for the downstream operations, whether to produce a protein in an unfolded form or in its native folded form the purification of the aggregated unfolded proteins is simpler than that of the native protein, but the refolding process itself to obtain the product in its final form may lack scalabihty. 

Invoices statement of procedure for submitting invoices Quality Control explanation of responsibilities for analysis of supplied materials, finished product, and work in progress consequences of off-spec materials procedure for rework Process Ownership specification of who owns the process, degree of liability for remediation, procedure for review and approval of process changes... 

The dispersion of a solute band in a packed column was originally treated comprehensively by Van Deemter et al. [4] who postulated that there were four first-order effect, spreading processes that were responsible for peak dispersion. These the authors designated as multi-path dispersion, longitudinal diffusion, resistance to mass transfer in the mobile phase and resistance to mass transfer in the stationary phase. Van Deemter derived an expression for the variance contribution of each dispersion process to the overall variance per unit length of the column. Consequently, as the individual dispersion processes can be assumed to be random and non-interacting, the total variance per unit length of the column was obtained from a sum of the individual variance contributions. 

Bacterial catabolism of oral food residue is probably responsible for a higher [NHj] in the oral cavity than in the rest of the respiratory tract.Ammonia, the by-product of oral bacterial protein catabolism and subsequent ureolysis, desorbs from the fluid lining the oral cavity to the airstream.. Saliva, gingival crevicular fluids, and dental plaque supply urea to oral bacteria and may themselves be sites of bacterial NH3 production, based on the presence of urease in each of these materials.Consequently, oral cavity fNTi3)4 is controlled by factors that influence bacterial protein catabolism and ureolysis. Such factors may include the pH of the surface lining fluid, bacterial nutrient sources (food residue on teeth or on buccal surfaces), saliva production, saliva pH, and the effects of oral surface temperature on bacterial metabolism and wall blood flow. The role of teeth, as structures that facilitate bacterial colonization and food entrapment, in augmenting [NH3J4 is unknown. 

The customer is responsible for the product they supply wherever it came from in the first place. It is therefore very important that you establish the condition of the product before you store it or use it. In the event that you detect that the product is damaged, defective, or incomplete, you should place it in a quarantine area and report the condition to the customer. Even if the product is needed urgently and can still be used, you should obtain the agreement of your customer before using inferior product, otherwise you may be held liable for the consequences. 

In some organizations, designated individuals have specific responsibility for eliciting detailed information from operational staff on the immediate and underlying causes of incidents. An example is the Human Performance Evaluation System (HPES) developed for the nuclear industry, which is described in Bishop and Larhette (1988). These coordinators provide a certain level of guaranteed irrununity from sanctions which allows individuals to be frank about the contributory causes that they may not be willing to discuss in an open forum. As discussed earlier, the need for this approach is a consequence of the fact that in many organizations a blame culture exists which is likely to inhibit a free flow of information about the causes of accidents. 

---