Resonance effect electrophilic aromatic

This led to the introduction of the concepts of inductive and resonance effects and to the establishment of the mechanism of electrophilic aromatic substitution. 

There were two schools of thought concerning attempts to extend Hammett s treatment of substituent effects to electrophilic substitutions. It was felt by some that the effects of substituents in electrophilic aromatic substitutions were particularly susceptible to the specific demands of the reagent, and that the variability of the polarizibility effects, or direct resonance interactions, would render impossible any attempted correlation using a two-parameter equation. - o This view was not universally accepted, for Pearson, Baxter and Martin suggested that, by choosing a different model reaction, in which the direct resonance effects of substituents participated, an equation, formally similar to Hammett s equation, might be devised to correlate the rates of electrophilic aromatic and electrophilic side chain reactions. We shall now consider attempts which have been made to do this. 

A tertiary carbonium ion is more stable than a secondary carbonium ion, which is in turn more stable than a primary carbonium ion. Therefore, the alkylation of ben2ene with isobutylene is much easier than is alkylation with ethylene. The reactivity of substituted aromatics for electrophilic substitution is affected by the inductive and resonance effects of a substituent. An electron-donating group, such as the hydroxyl and methyl groups, activates the alkylation and an electron-withdrawing group, such as chloride, deactivates it. 

Resonance effects are the primary influence on orientation and reactivity in electrophilic substitution. The common activating groups in electrophilic aromatic substitution, in approximate order of decreasing effectiveness, are —NR2, —NHR, —NH2, —OH, —OR, —NO, —NHCOR, —OCOR, alkyls, —F, —Cl, —Br, —1, aryls, —CH2COOH, and —CH=CH—COOH. Activating groups are ortho- and para-directing. Mixtures of ortho- and para-isomers are frequently produced the exact proportions are usually a function of steric effects and reaction conditions. 

We will address this issue further in Chapter 10, where the polar effects of the substituents on both the c and n electrons will be considered. For the case of electrophilic aromatic substitution, where the energetics of interaction of an approaching electrophile with the 7t system determines both the rate of reaction and position of substitution, simple resonance arguments are extremely useful. 

The substituent effects in aromatic electrophilic substitution are dominated by resonance effects. In other systems, stereoelectronic effects or steric effects might be more important. Whatever the nature of the substituent effects, the Hammond postulate insists diat structural discussion of transition states in terms of reactants, intermediates, or products is valid only when their structures and energies are similar. 

One further comparison aromatic aldehydes, such as benzaldehyde, are less reactive in nucleophilic addition reactions than aliphatic aldehydes because the electron-donating resonance effect of the aromatic ring makes the carbonyl group less electrophilic. Comparing electrostatic potential maps of formaldehyde and benzaldehyde, for example, shows that the carbonyl carbon atom is less positive (less blue) in the aromatic aldehyde. 

The effect of a substituent on the aromatic substitution reaction is similar to its effect on electrophilic side chain reactions, but not precisely parallel. Thus the Hammett relationship using the usual sigma or substituent constants gives considerable scatter when applied to aromatic substitution. The scatter is probably due to an increased importance of resonance effects in the nuclear substitution reaction as compared with the side chain reactions. 

In phenols, the reactions that take place on the aromatic ring are electrophilic substitution reactions (Unit 13, Class XI). The -OH group attached to the benzene ring activates it towards electrophilic substitution. Also, it directs the incoming group to ortho and para positions in the ring as these positions become eiectron rich due to the resonance effect caused by -OH group. The resonance structures are shown under acidity of phenols. 

The presence of -OH group In phenols activates the aromatic ring towards electrophilic substitution and directs the Incoming group to ortho and para positions due to resonance effect. Reimer-Tiemann reaction of phenol 5delds sallcylaldehyde. In presence of sodium hydroxide, phenol generates phenoxlde Ion which Is even more reactive than phenol. Thus, In alkaline medium, phenol undergoes Kolbe s reaction. 

The effect of monofluorination on alkene or aromatic reactivity toward electrophiles is more difficult to predict Although a-fluonne stabilizes a carbocation relative to hydrogen, its opposing inductive effect makes olefins and aromatics more electron deficient. Fluorine therefore is activating only for electrophilic reactions with very late transition states where its resonance stabilization is maximized The faster rate of addition of trifluoroacetic acid and sulfuric acid to 2-fluoropropene vs propene is an example [775,116], but cases of such enhanced fluoroalkene reactivity in solution are quite rare [127] By contrast, there are many examples where the ortho-para-dueeting fluorine substituent is also activating in electrophilic aromatic substitutions [128]... 

Two of three nitrofluorobenzene isomers react with methoxide, but the third is unreactive. Obtain energies of methoxide anion (at left), ortho, meta and para-nitrofluorobenzene, and the corresponding ortho, meta and para-methoxide anion adducts (so-called Meisenheimer complexes). Calculate the energy of methoxide addition to each of the three substrates. Which substrate is probably unreactive What is the apparent directing effect of a nitro group Does a nitro group have the same effect on nucleophilic aromatic substitution that it has on electrophilic aromatic substitution (see Chapter 13, Problem 4) Examine the structures and electrostatic potential maps of the Meisenheimer complexes. Use resonance arguments to rationalize what you observe. 

Another interpretation for the meta sequence is conceivable. Polarization of the aromatic by an electrophilic reagent (Z+) may induce the latent resonance effects of the m-fluoro substituent ... 

This is so because the methyl substituent can affect the rate and the position of further substitution. A substituent can either activate or deactivate the aromatic ring towards electrophilic substitution and does so through inductive or resonance effects. A substituent can also direct the next substitution so that it goes mainly ortho/para or mainly meta. 

The aromatic ring is deactivated toward electrophilic aromatic substitution by the combined electron-withdrawing inductive effect of electronegative nitrogen and oxygen. The lone pair of electrons of nitrogen can, however, stabilize by resonance the ortho and para substituted intermediates but not the meta intermediate. 

The reaction apparently proceeds by the electrophilic attack of an acylium ion or protonated mixed anhydride [ArCO(H)OS02CF3], upon the para-position of an aromatic ether (Fig. 37). Loss of a proton results in the formation of 256. The nonsubstituted aryl group of the diphenyl ether was found to be much less reactive toward electrophilic substitution. This group is deactivated by protonation of the keto group in the strongly acidic environment. Therefore, monomers must be designed so that this type of resonance effect does not inhibit substitution at the second site of substitution [Eq. (53)] [162]. 

---