Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Representations, completely reduced structure

Figure 6 is a graphic representation of foam structures in which the microspheres are dispersed randomly (a) and uniformly in close packing (b). In both structures, the two phases fill completely the whole volume (no dispersed air voids) and the density of the product is thus calculated from the relative proportions of the two. Measured density values often differ from the calculated ones, due to the existence of some isolated or interconnected, irregularly shaped voids as shown in Fig. 6c. The voids are usually an incidental part of the composite, as it is not easy to avoid their formation. Nevertheless, voids are often introduced intentionally to reduce the density below the minimum possible in a close-packed two-phase structure. In such three-phase systems the resin matrix is mainly a binding material, holding the structure of the microspheres together. Figure 6 is a graphic representation of foam structures in which the microspheres are dispersed randomly (a) and uniformly in close packing (b). In both structures, the two phases fill completely the whole volume (no dispersed air voids) and the density of the product is thus calculated from the relative proportions of the two. Measured density values often differ from the calculated ones, due to the existence of some isolated or interconnected, irregularly shaped voids as shown in Fig. 6c. The voids are usually an incidental part of the composite, as it is not easy to avoid their formation. Nevertheless, voids are often introduced intentionally to reduce the density below the minimum possible in a close-packed two-phase structure. In such three-phase systems the resin matrix is mainly a binding material, holding the structure of the microspheres together.
Figure 4.14 Diagrammatic representation of (a) oxy-radical>mediated S-thioiation and (b) thiol/disulphide-initiated S-thiolation of protein suiphydryl groups. Under both circumstances mixed disuiphides are formed between glutathione and protein thiois iocated on the ion-translocator protein resulting in an alteration of protein structure and function. Both of these mechanisms are completely reversible by the addition of a suitabie reducing agent, such as reduced glutathione, returning the protein to its native form. Figure 4.14 Diagrammatic representation of (a) oxy-radical>mediated S-thioiation and (b) thiol/disulphide-initiated S-thiolation of protein suiphydryl groups. Under both circumstances mixed disuiphides are formed between glutathione and protein thiois iocated on the ion-translocator protein resulting in an alteration of protein structure and function. Both of these mechanisms are completely reversible by the addition of a suitabie reducing agent, such as reduced glutathione, returning the protein to its native form.
The expressions eqs. (1.197), (1.199), (1.200), (1.201) are completely general. From them it is clear that the reduced density matrices are much more economical tools for representing the electronic structure than the wave functions. The two-electron density (more demanding quantity of the two) depends only on two pairs of electronic variables (either continuous or discrete) instead of N electronic variables required by the wave function representation. The one-electron density is even simpler since it depends only on one pair of such coordinates. That means that in the density matrix representation only about (2M)4 numbers are necessary to describe the system (in fact - less due to antisymmetry), whereas the description in terms of the wave function requires, as we know n 2m-n) numbers (FCI expansion amplitudes). However, the density matrices are rarely used directly in quantum chemistry procedures. The reason is the serious problem which appears when one is trying to construct the adequate representation for the left hand sides of the above definitions without addressing any wave functions in the right hand sides. This is known as the (V-representability problem, unsolved until now [51] for the two-electron density matrices. The second is that the symmetry conditions for the electronic states are much easier formulated and controlled in terms of the wave functions (Density matrices are the entities of the second power with respect to the wave functions so their symmetries are described by the second tensor powers of those of the wave functions). [Pg.69]

Although the representation of these queries is very similar to a combinatorial library, there are some significant differences in both design and use. Since the exact compositions of the database structures are not determined until after the query has been posed, the query typically contains query features, such as fuzzy atoms and bonds and ambiguous connectivity. There is no need for these features to represent a combinatorial library, since all the structures are known. The syntax for representing R-groups in a query can also include features such as zero occurrences to reduce the retrieval of undesired records. Such a feature is unnecessary for a combinatorial library representation, since it is a complete set of specific structures and not an open-ended query. [Pg.268]

With the regard to the interpretability of the infrared spectra, it was experimentally found (ref. 6 and 7) that the representation of somewhere between 64 and 128 coefficients (closer to the 128 side) is the minimum required by an experienced spectroscopist for the determination of specific structural features. This does not mean that any infrared spectrum could be completely interpreted from a curve consisting of only 128 intensity points however, it has been shown recently that identical clustering in a small group of spectra can be obtained even by a far more reduced representation containing only about 3% of the original set (ref. [Pg.96]

It is often necessary to focus on the surroundings of a particular atom or ion in a solid and, for this purpose, structures drawn in terms of polyhedra are helpful. The polyhedra selected are generally metal-nonmetal coordination polyhedra. These are composed of a central metal atom surrounded by nonmetal atoms. By reducing the nonmetal atoms to points and then joining the points by lines one is able to construct the polyhedral shape. These polyhedra are then linked together to build up the complete structure. This representation has aheady been used as a way of describing the structure of diamond (Figure 5.20). [Pg.138]

Because chemical structure representation in diagrammatic form has inconsistencies and contradictions built into it, it is impossible to anticipate every case. Most of the problem areas can be dealt with by a few general rules, but to cover all eventualities would require a huge system of regulations, with many provisos. Therefore, the aim of our rules is to cover the commonest problems and to ensure that only one representation will need to be assigned in most cases. Even when the rules fail to resolve a choice of structure completely, at least the number of possible structures should be reduced. In cases not covered by our rules, the structures given in the document will be indexed. [Pg.177]

For crystals with a triclinic structure, which possess only a center of symmetry and exhibit the most general elastic anisotropy, a complete characterization requires all 21 independent constants. The existence of a higher degree of crystal symmetry can further reduce the number of independent elastic constants needed for proper description. In such cases, some elastic constants may vanish and members of some subsets of constants may be related to each other in some definite way, depending on the crystal symmetry. Finally, it should be noted that, while the total number of material constants required to characterize a material of a certain class is independent of the coordinate axes used to represent components of stress or strain, the values of particular components of Qj do depend on the material reference axes chosen for their representation. [Pg.170]

The fact that the folding (and unfolding) kinetics of relatively small, two-state proteins can be predicted with reasonable accuracy from global features of the native state like the contact order, stability, and number of contacts supports the idea that the details of protein structure are not required to capture the key features of protein folding, so that reduced representations should be adequate. However, the most widely used simple heteropolymer models, those restricted to a simple cubic lattice, predict that stability is more important than native structure, in contrast to the experimental data for proteins. In this section we seek to understand why lattice models differ from proteins in this regard. Doing so is of importance because complete details of the folding trajectories of such models... [Pg.29]


See other pages where Representations, completely reduced structure is mentioned: [Pg.7]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.591]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.648]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.1160]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.875]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.953]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.2768]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.830]    [Pg.432]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.108 ]




SEARCH



Reducible representation

Structural representation

Structure representation

© 2024 chempedia.info