Representation mechanical

The objects and their attributes are common to all implementations even though the specific representation mechanisms may differ. Even within a specific implementation technology, such as Java, there are many different ways to represent objects and their attributes. For those times when the implementation is as yet unknown or is irrelevant to the level of modeling at hand, we need a way to describe our objects and attributes independent of implementation. 

Kinds of models seem to lie more along a continuum and are therefore less easily classified. The main continuum is closeness to causality. The scale slides from loose empiricism to exact causal representation (mechanism). How far along the scale the analyst moves may depend on either the maturity of the corresponding physical discipline or the needs imposed by the goals. 

Erom the top to the bottom of the template hierarchy the scope and the content of the respective templates increase considerably, e.g., from simple geometry to complex system representations. Furthermore also the complexity of the creation of the template and the required representation mechanisms increases rapidly for the template creator. One important challenge for end-user acceptance and to master the increasing and challenging template contents is to package the complexity for the end user in an easy-to use black box or grey box with defined interfaces to the other CAD elements at template instantiation. 

We have alluded to the comrection between the molecular PES and the spectroscopic Hamiltonian. These are two very different representations of the molecular Hamiltonian, yet both are supposed to describe the same molecular dynamics. Furthemrore, the PES often is obtained via ab initio quairtum mechanical calculations while the spectroscopic Hamiltonian is most often obtained by an empirical fit to an experimental spectrum. Is there a direct link between these two seemingly very different ways of apprehending the molecular Hamiltonian and dynamics And if so, how consistent are these two distinct ways of viewing the molecule ... 

Figure Al.6.10. (a) Schematic representation of the three potential energy surfaces of ICN in the Zewail experiments, (b) Theoretical quantum mechanical simulations for the reaction ICN ICN [I--------------...

For the quantum mechanical case, p and Ware operators (or matrices in appropriate representation) and the Poisson bracket is replaced by the connnutator [W, p] If the distribution is stationary, as for the systems in equilibrium, then Bp/dt = 0, which implies... 

A stationary ensemble density distribution is constrained to be a functional of the constants of motion (globally conserved quantities). In particular, a simple choice is pip, q) = p (W (p, q)), where p (W) is some fiinctional (fiinction of a fiinction) of W. Any such fiinctional has a vanishing Poisson bracket (or a connnutator) with Wand is thus a stationary distribution. Its dependence on (p, q) through Hip, q) = E is expected to be reasonably smooth. Quanttun mechanically, p (W) is die density operator which has some fiinctional dependence on the Hamiltonian Wdepending on the ensemble. It is also nonnalized Trp = 1. The density matrix is the matrix representation of the density operator in some chosen representation of a complete orthononnal set of states. If the complete orthononnal set of eigenstates of die Hamiltonian is known ... 

Figure Bl.16.22. Schematic representations of CIDEP spectra for hypothetical radical pair CH + R. Part A shows the A/E and E/A RPM. Part B shows the absorptive and emissive triplet mechanism. Part C shows the spin-correlated RPM for cases where J and J a.. ...

Fane U 1964 Liouville representation of quantum mechanics with application to relaxation processes Lectures on the Many Body Problem /o 2, ed E R Caianiello (New York Academic) pp 217-39... 

Figure B2.5.13. Schematic representation of the four different mechanisms of multiphoton excitation (i) direct, (ii) Goeppert-Mayer (iii) quasi-resonant stepwise and (iv) incoherent stepwise. Full lines (right) represent the coupling path between the energy levels and broken arrows the photon energies with angular frequency to (Aco is the frequency width of the excitation light in the case of incoherent excitation), see also [111].

Now we do one of the standard quantum mechanical tricks, inserting the identity operator as a complete sum of states in the coordinate representation ... 

Colbert D T and Miller W H 1992 A novel discrete variable representation for quantum mechanical reactive scattering via the S-matrix Kohn method J. Chem. Phys. 96 1982... 

Before concluding this sketch of optical phases and passing on to our next topic, the status of the phase in the representation of observables as quantum mechanical operators, we wish to call attention to the theoretical demonstration, provided in [129], that any (discrete, finite dimensional) operator can be constructed through use of optical devices only. 

Another possibility to represent the quantum mechanical Lagrangian density is using the logarithm of the amplitude X = Ina, a = e. In that particular representation, the Lagrangean density takes the following symmetrical fomi... 

In writing the Lagrangean density of quantum mechanics in the modulus-phase representation, Eq. (140), one notices a striking similarity between this Lagrangean density and that of potential fluid dynamics (fluid dynamics without vorticity) as represented in the work of Seliger and Whitham [325]. We recall briefly some parts of their work that are relevant, and then discuss the connections with quantum mechanics. The connection between fluid dynamics and quantum mechanics of an electron was already discussed by Madelung [326] and in Holland s book [324]. However, the discussion by Madelung refers to the equations only and does not address the variational formalism which we discuss here. 

In the full quantum mechanical picture, the evolving wavepackets are delocalized functions, representing the probability of finding the nuclei at a particular point in space. This representation is unsuitable for direct dynamics as it is necessary to know the potential surface over a region of space at each point in time. Fortunately, there are approximate formulations based on trajectories in phase space, which will be discussed below. These local representations, so-called as only a portion of the FES is examined at each point in time, have a classical flavor. The delocalized and nonlocal nature of the full solution of the Schtddinger equation should, however, be kept in mind. 

A number of procedures have been proposed to map a wave function onto a function that has the form of a phase-space distribution. Of these, the oldest and best known is the Wigner function [137,138]. (See [139] for an exposition using Louiville space.) For a review of this, and other distributions, see [140]. The quantum mechanical density matrix is a matrix representation of the density operator... 

The mechanism of the reaction in the lead chamber is complicated. The simple representation ... 

Left side of Fig. 4 shows a ribbon model of the catalytic (C-) subunit of the mammalian cAMP-dependent protein kinase. This was the first protein kinase whose structure was determined [35]. Figure 4 includes also a ribbon model of the peptide substrate, and ATP (stick representation) with two manganese ions (CPK representation). All kinetic evidence is consistent with a preferred ordered mechanism of catalysis with ATP binding proceeding substrate binding. 

Z-matriccs arc commonly used as input to quantum mechanical ab initio and serai-empirical) calculations as they properly describe the spatial arrangement of the atoms of a molecule. Note that there is no explicit information on the connectivity present in the Z-matrix, as there is, c.g., in a connection table, but quantum mechanics derives the bonding and non-bonding intramolecular interactions from the molecular electronic wavefunction, starting from atomic wavefiinctions and a crude 3D structure. In contrast to that, most of the molecular mechanics packages require the initial molecular geometry as 3D Cartesian coordinates plus the connection table, as they have to assign appropriate force constants and potentials to each atom and each bond in order to relax and optimi-/e the molecular structure. Furthermore, Cartesian coordinates are preferable to internal coordinates if the spatial situations of ensembles of different molecules have to be compared. Of course, both representations are interconvertible. 

Molecular orbitals were one of the first molecular features that could be visualized with simple graphical hardware. The reason for this early representation is found in the complex theory of quantum chemistry. Basically, a structure is more attractive and easier to understand when orbitals are displayed, rather than numerical orbital coefficients. The molecular orbitals, calculated by semi-empirical or ab initio quantum mechanical methods, are represented by isosurfaces, corresponding to the electron density surfeces Figure 2-125a). 

---