Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Renormalization renormalized interactions

Effect of off-diagonal dynamic disorder (off-DDD). The interaction of the electron with the fluctuations of the polarization and local vibrations near the other center leads to new terms VeP - V P, Vev - Vev and VeAp - VAPd, VA - VAd in the perturbation operators V°d and Vfd [see Eqs. (14)]. A part of these interactions corresponding to the equilibrium values of the polarization P0l and Po/ results in the renormalization of the electron interactions with ions A and B, due to their partial screening by the dielectric medium. However, at arbitrary values of the polarization P, there is another part of these interactions which is due to the fluctuating electric fields. This part of the interaction depends on the nuclear coordinates and may exceed the renormalized interactions of the electron with the donor and the acceptor. The interaction of the electron with these fluctuations plays an important role in processes involving solvated, trapped, and weakly bound electrons. [Pg.103]

Coarse-grained molecular d5mamics simulations in the presence of solvent provide insights into the effect of dispersion medium on microstructural properties of the catalyst layer. To explore the interaction of Nation and solvent in the catalyst ink mixture, simulations were performed in the presence of carbon/Pt particles, water, implicit polar solvent (with different dielectric constant e), and ionomer. Malek et al. developed the computational approach based on CGMD simulations in two steps. In the first step, groups of atoms of the distinct components were replaced by spherical beads with predefined subnanoscopic length scale. In the second step, parameters of renormalized interaction energies between the distinct beads were specified. [Pg.409]

Andersen, H. C. Diagrammatic Formulation of the Kinetic Theory of Fluctuations in Equilibrium Classical Fluids. III. Cluster Analysis of the Renormalized Interactions and a Second Diagrammatic Representation of the Correlation Functions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 10234-10242. [Pg.667]

P, J. Berkhout and I. F. Silvera. Mixing of rotational states, breakdown of the independent polarizability approximation and renormalized interactions in the solid hydrogens under pressure. Communic. Phys., 2 109-114 (1977). [Pg.494]

We can overcome all of these problems by taking the continuous chain limit in a more sophisticated way. We introduce a renormalized interaction constant u and a renormalized chain length ur by the formal relations... [Pg.179]

In field theory, one uses a parameter related to the behaviour of the renormalized four-leg vertex and incorrectly called the renormalized interaction . In a very similar way, in polymer theory, the second virial coefficient can be used to define the interaction between two polymers. We proceed as follows. [Pg.509]

The interaction b(T) must be interpreted here as a renormalized interaction (see Section t and Chapter (4, Section 6). [Pg.804]

Symmetrized Two-Particle Correlations with Renormalized Interactions... [Pg.194]

We have introduced three renormalized interactions V, W, and r(z). An understanding of their properties is essential for deriving useful approximations to G. We first consider the purely static quantity V. By using (51) we have... [Pg.196]

Figure 5.11. Diagrammatic representation of the renormalization perturbation row through the first order in the renormalization interaction (see Figure 5.10) cross-dashed straight line is the unperturbed distribution function (see Figure 5.6), crosses denote the interaction line K, vi) (see Figure 5.10) (Oono and Freed, 1981a) [Reprinted with per-iiiissioii from Y.Oono, K.F.Frecd. J. Chem. Phys. 75 (1981) 993-1008. Copyright 0 1981 American Institute of Physics]... Figure 5.11. Diagrammatic representation of the renormalization perturbation row through the first order in the renormalization interaction (see Figure 5.10) cross-dashed straight line is the unperturbed distribution function (see Figure 5.6), crosses denote the interaction line K, vi) (see Figure 5.10) (Oono and Freed, 1981a) [Reprinted with per-iiiissioii from Y.Oono, K.F.Frecd. J. Chem. Phys. 75 (1981) 993-1008. Copyright 0 1981 American Institute of Physics]...
In the second step, parameters of renormalized interaction energies between beads are specified, defining the force field under which the system trajectory evolves. Interactions between beads could be determined by force matching procedures from atomistic interactions (Izvekov and Violi, 2006 Izvekov et al., 2005) or by fitting of experimental structural correlation functions (Marrink et al., 2007). [Pg.90]

L. G. Feneira, S.-H. Wei, and A. Zunger. First-principles calculation of alloy phase diagrams the renormalized-interaction approach. Pkys. Rev. 8,40 3197-3231,1989. [Pg.109]

It is now possible to account qualitatively for the dumbbell formation seen in Fig. 7.38, by a theory that computes effective renormalized interactions from the Edwards Hamiltonian. However, a quantitative description of these data presented in Figs 7.17(a) and 7.38 is still lacking. While experimental results have also been interpreted in terms of chain stretching, it is important to recall that experiments up to now could measure S coii( ) only an independent measurement of both q and Rg for the same material has thus far not been feasible. This fact again illustrates one advantage of simulation, namely that it makes a much more detailed insight possible in that all quantities of interest can be measured simultaneously from one model system. [Pg.420]

Figure 4 Shape of the Wilson function vs. the renormalized interaction parameter g is the fixed point... Figure 4 Shape of the Wilson function vs. the renormalized interaction parameter g is the fixed point...
It is well known that it is difficult to solve numerically integral equations for models with Coulomb interaction [69,70]. One needs to develop a renormalization scheme for the long-range terms of ion-ion correlations. Here we must do that for ROZ equations. [Pg.337]

The correlation functions of the partly quenched system satisfy a set of replica Ornstein-Zernike equations (21)-(23). Each of them is a 2 x 2 matrix equation for the model in question. As in previous studies of ionic systems (see, e.g.. Refs. 69, 70), we denote the long-range terms of the pair correlation functions in ROZ equations by qij. Here we apply a linearized theory and assume that the long-range terms of the direct correlation functions are equal to the Coulomb potentials which are given by Eqs. (53)-(55). This assumption represents the mean spherical approximation for the model in question. Most importantly, (r) = 0 as mentioned before, the particles from different replicas do not interact. However, q]f r) 7 0 these functions describe screening effects of the ion-ion interactions between ions from different replicas mediated by the presence of charged obstacles, i.e., via the matrix. The functions q j (r) need to be obtained to apply them for proper renormalization of the ROZ equations for systems made of nonpoint ions. [Pg.338]

Renormalized pair interactions (in mRy) for the (001) surface of fee Ag )r the converged inhomogeneous concentration profile. ... [Pg.137]

A more accurate analysis of this problem incorporating renormalization results, is possible [86], but the essential result is the same, namely that stretched, tethered chains interact less strongly with one another than the same chains in bulk. The appropriate comparison is with a bulk-like system of chains in a brush confined by an impenetrable wall a distance RF (the Flory radius of gyration) from the tethering surface. These confined chains, which are incapable of stretching, assume configurations similar to those of free chains. However, the volume fraction here is q> = N(a/d)2 RF N2/5(a/d)5/3, as opposed to cp = N(a/d)2 L (a/d)4/3 in the unconfined, tethered layer. Consequently, the chain-chain interaction parameter becomes x ab N3/2(a/d)5/2 %ab- Thus, tethered chains tend to mix, or at least resist phase separation, more readily than their bulk counterparts because chain stretching lowers the effective concentration within the layer. The effective interaction parameters can be used in further analysis of phase separation processes... [Pg.54]

We will describe a systematic approach to renormalize the intrachain interactions towards a coarser level for three different modifications of polycarbonates. The advantage of examinig three modifications of the same polymer gives a first hint of the sensitivity of the method. The three modifications of the polycarbonate are BPA-PC, BPZ-PC, and TMC-PC. The structures are given in Fig. 6.1. Although the backbone sequence is the same they have re-... [Pg.136]

A comparison with Burchard s first cumulant calculations shows qualitative agreement, in particular with respect to the position of the minimum. Quantitatively, however, important differences are obvious. Both the sharpness as well as the amplitude of the phenomenon are underestimated. These deviations may originate from an overestimation of the hydrodynamic interaction between segments. Since a star of high f internally compromises a semi-dilute solution, the back-flow field of solvent molecules will be partly screened [40,117]. Thus, the effects of hydrodynamic interaction, which in general eases the renormalization effects owing to S(Q) [152], are expected to be weaker than assumed in the cumulant calculations and thus the minimum should be more pronounced than calculated. Furthermore, since for Gaussian chains the relaxation rate decreases... [Pg.99]

Formally, this procedure is correct only for spectra that are linear in the frequency, that is, spectra whose line positions are caused by the Zeeman interaction only, and whose linewidths are caused by a distribution in the Zeeman interaction (in g-values) only. Such spectra do exist low-spin heme spectra (e.g., cytochrome c cf. Figure 5.4F) fall in this category. But there are many more spectra that also carry contributions from field-independent interactions such as hyperfine splittings. Our frequency-renormalization procedure will still be applicable, as long as two spectra do not differ too much in frequency. In practice, this means that they should at least be taken at frequencies in the same band. For a counter-example, in Figure 5.6 we plotted the X-band and Q-band spectra of cobalamin (dominated by hyperfine interactions) normalized to a single frequency. To construct difference spectra from these two arrays obviously will generate nonsensical results. [Pg.105]


See other pages where Renormalization renormalized interactions is mentioned: [Pg.12]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.683]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.610]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.462]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.194 ]




SEARCH



A Renormalization of the interaction parameters

Bare interaction energy, renormalization

Higher interactions and additive renormalization

Properties of Renormalized Interactions

Renormalization

Renormalization methods, interaction site

Renormalized interaction

Renormalized interaction

Renormalized solute-solvent interactions

Tricritical renormalization of the two-body interaction terms that are proportional to

© 2024 chempedia.info