Reliability theory failure rate

Equation 4.34 represents probably one of the most important theories in reliability (Carter, 1986). The number of load applieations defines the useful life of the eompo-nent and is of appropriate eoneern to the designer (Bury, 1974). The number of times a load is applied has an effeet on the failure rate of the equipment due to the faet that the probability of experieneing higher loads from the distribution population has inereased. Eaeh load applieation in sequenee is independent and belongs to the same load distribution and it is assumed that the material suffers no strength... 

RMDB is supplemented by microfilmed reports containing failure rates/modes and analyzed data. Reports relating to the theory and procedural techniques to obtain and analyze reliability-maintainability data are cataloged, abstracted, microfilmed and computer listed in the R-M Data Summaries. 

According to the theory of reliability engineering, the rate of accumulative failure (malfunction) is H t) = t)d so D = H(t). Furthermore, the system safety damage function can be calculated according to the distribution of accumulative failure, as follows. 

These rationales and assumptions are often not included in the FMEA report, but must be available for audit (by the Independent Safety Auditor) and must be kept for future reference. The customer needs to be aware of these data and may consider ensuring that its inclusion is captured in the contractual deliverable. For relative frequency of failure modes of electronic components, it is also possible to refer to Alessandro Brilini s Reliability Engineering Theory and Practice, 1997. If, however, failure rates cannot be apportioned in a justified way (i.e. from in-service experience of published data), then it should be justified by qualitative argument (see Table 3.3). 

The lack of data to support claims for failure rates is an issue which is widely investigated by data uncertainty analyses. For example, Hauptmanns, 2008 compares the use of reliability data stemming from different sources on probabilistic safety calculations, and tends to prove that results do not differ substantially. Wang, 2004 discusses and identifies the inputs that may lead to SIL estimation changes. Propagation of error, Monte Carlo, and Bayesian methods (Guerin, 2003) are quite common. Fuzzy set theory is also often used to handle data uncertainties, especially into fault tree analyses (Tanaka, 1983, Singer, 1990). Other approaches are based on evidence, possibihty, and interval analyses (Helton, 2004). 

Our worst case bound research [Bishop 2002a] suggests that it is possible to take a reliability bound for a given test profile and scale it up for a different operational profile. The basic assumption in this theory is that, for a fault is associated with coverage element i (e.g. a particular output value), the failure rate is proportional to the element execution rate, X(i). If the logic is tested under one profile and operated under another profile, it follows that the failure rate is scaled by ... 

The computation of spacecraft power system reliability is strictly based on the rehability data of the components involved. The rehability theory indicates that component reliability is defined as the probability that a specific component will perform as per its performance specifications during an interval of time under specific operating conditions. The determination of component reliabihty involves computing the component failure rate from the part failure rate data, applying this... 

In reliability theory the most common probability distributions for the modelling time to failure (Lewis, 1994, Zio, 2007) exponential Exp(X) (in case of constant failure rate) Weibull W k, p) lognormal Log-N i, o ) gamma F(a, P), etc. 

We would, therefore, agree with Bond s conclusion (3) that application of the transition state theory to heterogeneous reactions has not so far provided insight into the mechanisms of surface reactions and that the failures of the theory are generally more significant than the successes. We do not accept that the use of the theory of absolute reaction rates in the interpretation of kinetic data provides a general and reliable method for the estimation of the concentration of surface active sites but conclude that results should always be considered with reference to appropriate quantitative supporting evidence (133). 

Statistical assessment of time to failure is a basic topic in reliability engineering for which many mathematical tools have been developed. Evans, who also pioneered the mixed potential theory to explain basic corrosion kinetics, launched the concept of corrosion probability in relation to localized corrosion. According to Evans, an exact knowledge of corrosion rate was less important than the ascertainment of the statistical risk of its initiation [12]. The following examples illustrate the application of empirical modeling in two areas of high criticality. 

---