Relativistic molecules

There is a nice point as to what we mean by the experimental energy. All the calculations so far have been based on non-relativistic quantum mechanics. A measure of the importance of relativistic effects for a given atom is afforded by its spin-orbit coupling parameter. This parameter can be easily determined from spectroscopic studies, and it is certainly not zero for first-row atoms. We should strictly compare the HF limit to an experimental energy that refers to a non-relativistic molecule. This is a moot point we can neither calculate molecular energies at the HF limit, nor can we easily make measurements that allow for these relativistic effects. 

The central equation of (non-relativistic) quantum mechanics, governing an isolated atom or molecule, is the time-dependent Schrodinger equation (TDSE) ... 

The Schrodinger equation is a nonreiativistic description of atoms and molecules. Strictly speaking, relativistic effects must be included in order to obtain completely accurate results for any ah initio calculation. In practice, relativistic effects are negligible for many systems, particularly those with light elements. It is necessary to include relativistic effects to correctly describe the behavior of very heavy elements. With increases in computer capability and algorithm efficiency, it will become easier to perform heavy atom calculations and thus an understanding of relativistic corrections is necessary. 

The most common description of relativistic quantum mechanics for Fermion systems, such as molecules, is the Dirac equation. The Dirac equation is a one-electron equation. In formulating this equation, the terms that arise are intrinsic electron spin, mass defect, spin couplings, and the Darwin term. The Darwin term can be viewed as the effect of an electron making a high-frequency oscillation around its mean position. 

Core potentials are seldom used for organic molecules because there are so few electrons in the core. Relativistic effects are seldom included since they have very little effect on the result. Ah initio methods are discussed further in Chapter 3. 

The various solutions to Equation 3 correspond to different stationary states of the particle (molecule). The one with the lowest energy is called the ground stale. Equation 3 is a non-relativistic description of the system which is not valid when the velocities of particles approach the speed of light. Thus, Equation 3 does not give an accurate description of the core electrons in large nuclei. 

At a physical level. Equation 35 represents a mixing of all of the possible electronic states of the molecule, all of which have some probability of being attained according to the laws of quantum mechanics. Full Cl is the most complete non-relativistic treatment of the molecular system possible, within the limitations imposed by the chosen basis set. It represents the possible quantum states of the system while modelling the electron density in accordance with the definition (and constraints) of the basis set in use. For this reason, it appears in the rightmost column of the following methods chart ... 

Having stated the limitations (non-relativistic Hamilton operator and the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation), we are ready to consider the electronic Schrodinger equation. It can only be solved exactly for the Hj molecule, and similar one-electron systems. In the general case we have to rely on approximate (numerical) methods. By neglecting relativistic effects, we also have to introduce electron spin as an ad hoc quantum effect. Each electron has a spin quantum number of 1 /2. In the presence of an... 

Although an in-depth treatment is outside the scope of this book, it may be instructive to point out some of the features and problems in a relativistic quantum description of atoms and molecules. 

The total energy in ab initio theory is given relative to the separated particles, i.e. bare nuclei and electrons. The experimental value for an atom is the sum of all the ionization potentials for a molecule there are additional contributions from the molecular bonds and associated zero-point energies. The experimental value for the total energy of H2O is —76.480 a.u., and the estimated contribution from relativistic effects is —0.045 a.u. Including a mass correction of 0.0028 a.u. (a non-Bom-Oppenheimer effect which accounts for the difference between finite and infinite nuclear masses) allows the experimental non-relativistic energy to be estimated at —76.438 0.003 a.u. ... 

In Science, every concept, question, conclusion, experimental result, method, theory or relationship is always open to reexamination. Molecules do exist Nevertheless, there are serious questions about precise definition. Some of these questions lie at the foundations of modem physics, and some involve states of aggregation or extreme conditions such as intense radiation fields or the region of the continuum. There are some molecular properties that are definable only within limits, for example, the geometrical stmcture of non-rigid molecules, properties consistent with the uncertainty principle, or those limited by the negleet of quantum-field, relativistic or other effects. And there are properties which depend specifically on a state of aggregation, such as superconductivity, ferroelectric (and anti), ferromagnetic (and anti), superfluidity, excitons. polarons, etc. Thus, any molecular definition may need to be extended in a more complex situation. 

AuH and Au2 serve as benchmark molecules to test the performance of various relativistic approximations. Figure 4.7 shows predictions for relativistic bond contractions of Au2 from various quantum chemical calculations over more than a decade. In the early years of relativistic quantum chemistry these predictions varied significantly (between 0.2 and 0.3 A), but as the methods and algorithms became more refined, and the computers more powerful, the relativistic bond contraction for Au2 converged and is now at 0.26 A. 

Grant, I.P. (2007) Relativistic Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules. Theory and Computation, Springer, New York. 

Anton, J., Ericke, B. and Engel, E. (2004) Noncollinear and collinear relativistic density-functional program for electric and magnetic properties of molecules. Physical Review A, 69, 012505-1-012505-10. 

Ermler, W.C., Ross, R.B. and Christiansen, P.A. (1988) Spin-Orbit Coupling and Other Relativistic Effects in Atoms and Molecules. Advances in Quantum Chemistry, 19, 139-182. 

Park, C. and Almldf, J.E. (1994) Two-electron relativistic effects in molecules. Chemical Physics Letters, 231,... 

Varga, S., Engel, E., Sepp, W.-D. and Fricke, B. (1999) Systematic study of the lb diatomic molecules Cu2, Ag2, and Au2 using advanced relativistic density functionals. Physical Review A, 59, 4288-4294. 

Abe, M., Mori, S., Nakajima, T. and Hirao, K. (2005) Electronic structures of PtCu, PtAg, and PtAu molecules a Dirac four-component relativistic study. Chemical Physics, 311, 129-137. 

Schwerdtfeger, P., Bast, R., Gerry, M.C.L., Jacob, C.R., Jansen, M., Kelld, V., Mudring, A.V., Sadlej, A.J., Saue, T, Sdhnel, T. and Wagner, F.E. (2005) The quadrupole moment of the 3 /2 nuclear groimd state of Au from electric field gradient relativistic coupled cluster and density functional theory of small molecules and the solid slide. Journal of Chemical Physics, 122,124317-1-124317-9. 

---