Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Relative dating

Chronology may be expressed in two forms absolute and relative chronology. Absolute chronology depends on knowing the precise date of events or age of materials or objects. To sequence events or objects in absolute chronology implies organizing them in a certain order, for example, from oldest to most recent. Relative chronology is not expressed in specific dates but rather in a sequential relationship of events. Relative dates are therefore expressed in relation to those of other objects or events they do not specify the precise age of objects or the time of occurrence of events. Absolute dates provide the precise age of objects and the time of occurrence of events, and are derived independently of those of other objects or events. [Pg.69]

FUN dating is applied to obtain a relative dating of bones found in the same archaeological site or deposit rather than for absolute dating. [Pg.31]

P. Walter, M. Menu, I.C. Vickridge, Fluorine depth profiles as a relative dating method of chipped flints, Nucl. Instr. Meth. B45 (1990) 119-122. [Pg.249]

S. Holdaway, Fluorine Profiling A New Method for the Relative Dating of Bone, Dissertation for BA, Anthropology Department, University of Otago, 1981. [Pg.251]

The F uptake of flint takes a much longer time than that for bone. Fluorine diffusion into the depth of flint material is controlled by defect clusters. The diffusion coefficient determined by implanting a model compound (amorphous silica bombarded with heavy ions and hydrated at 100°C) is 9.10—21 cm2/s at room temperature. The corresponding penetration depth of F under ambient conditions in a 1000-year-old artefact can be estimated via x — (Dt)1/2 = 0.17. im [50], Thus, F accumulates only in the first micrometre of the surface. The surface of ancient flint artefacts can be altered by dissolution. The occurrence of this phenomenon is especially important in basic media. However, in some cases, the thickness of the dissolved layer can be neglected compared to the F penetration depth at low temperatures. Therefore, Walter et al. [35] proposed relative dating of chipped flint by measuring the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of F diffusion profiles in theses cases. [Pg.261]

Fig. 11.26 4He concentrations relative to 14C ages of waters in the Bunter sandstone wells. 14C ages were calculated from the data of Bath et al. (1979), applying 70 pmc as an initial 14C concentration. The positive correlation validates the relative dating by the two independent methods. Waters of groups A, B, and C have been recharged at different times and do not represent continuous down-gradient flow (see text). [Pg.261]

A major limitation in rock art studies is that rock art can be difficult to date. The dating techniques currently in use fall into two broad categories relative dating and absolute dating. [Pg.813]

Relative dating techniques include observations of patterns of chemical and physical weathering, evidence that art has been painted over, stylistic patterns, and variations in the spatial patterns of rock art indicating chronological sequences of site occupation. [Pg.813]

Fluorine absorption An archaeometric test for relative dating based on the assumption that fluorine accumulates at a constant rate in buried bone. [Pg.267]

Relative dating Method of dating that determines whether an object or layer is older or younger than another. [Pg.272]

For regular tests a LIMS offers the functionality of automatic test programs that are used for processes, which can be planned exactly. Examples are calibration of instruments, audits, and assessment of environmental impact in regular intervals. After an automatic test program has been initiated, it starts working on a predefined relative date or time to compile and generate processes on the basis of the respective definitions in the standard. [Pg.301]

Using a relative dating method, one can calculate the age of a pottery sherd from... [Pg.609]

In 1853 and 1855 Wocel, an Austrian, published two papers on the analysis of specimens of ancient bronze which he had made, but in addition, summarized a number of earlier analyses He took an important step forward when he argued that the relative dating, or sedation, of ancient metal specimens mi t be reflected in their chemical compositions. A number of additional examples of early archaeological chemistry are given in the excellent books and reviews of Earle R. Caley 3. n, i2)... [Pg.59]


See other pages where Relative dating is mentioned: [Pg.419]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.222]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.44 , Pg.449 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.44 , Pg.449 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.254 , Pg.257 , Pg.261 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info