Relational view

Dyer, J. H. Singh, H. 1998. The relational view cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4) 660-679. 

McCoy, T. J., Dickinson, T. L. and Lofgren, G. E. (1999) Partial melting of the Indarch (EH4) meteorite a textural, chemical, and phase relations view of melting and melt migration. Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 34, 735-746. 

Cram s Rule and Related Views on Asymmetric Induction... 

A related view of the physical basis of the solvent coordinate is the well-known reaction field R, which is the field located on the solute dipole due to the dipole induced solvent polarization. For example, the reaction field for the equilibrated excited state dipole Rlq is given by... 

It should be noted that spacetime as a set of hazy lumps or clouds is considered as a network of relations of factual items or things. In this sense we emphasize the relational view of geometry. 

Cortadella J, Valiente G. A relational view of subgraph isomorphism. In Proc. Fifth Int. Seminar on Relational Methods in Computer Science, Quebec, Canada, 2000. pp. 45-54. 

Like a relational view of data, a relational view of models is based on a mathematical theory of relations. Thus, a model is viewed as a virtual file or virtual relation. It is a subset of the Crutesian product of the domain set that corresponds to these input and output attribirtes. This virtual file is created, ideally, through exercising the model with a wide spectrum of inputs. These values of inputs and the associated outputs become records in the virtual file. The input data become key attributes and the model output data become content attribirtes. 

I wish now to discuss a contemporary view that does strike me as involving, at least implicitly, the Moorean variety of diaphanousness. I have in mind the view John Campbell has advanced first under the banner radical externalism and later under the banner the relational view of experience. ... 

I find confirmation of the hypothesis that Campbell is committed to radical transparency in later work promoting what he calls the relational view of experience. In the relational view, experience of an object is a simple relation holding between perceiver and object and the qualitative character of the experience is constituted [emphasis mine] by the qualitative character of the scene perceived.He characterizes the relational view further by saying ... 

Self-competence ability to reflect on one s own gendered biography, gender-related views and assumptions, social norms, and stereotypes (dimension of self-reflectivity)... 

Futurist John Naisbitt (2006) offers a related view of the future. He states When you re looking for the shape of the future, look for and bet on the exploiters of opportunities, not the problem solvers. He goes on to claim that individuals tend to embrace one of two poles, stasis or dynamism, stability versus evolution, predictability or surprise. His contrasts are aligned with the paradigm paralysis versus paradigm pliancy discussion later in this chapter. 

Furthermore, each of these sets of attributes and their internal and external relationships are characterised by their own properties. We will refer to this entirety as the hazard universe . It is possible to identify at least two different (but related) view points on the problem domain ... 

In practice, to reduce clutter, the tool allows additional restrictions to be placed when creating C-nodes. For the examples in this paper (Section 5), we also require that V7 g C. 3n,n G N.n y n. We can also relax this condition so that C-nodes are added as root. The last condition prevents C-nodes at the edge of the view, since they can only appear between regular nodes (as mentioned in Section 2.3). Next, we relate views to arguments. 

This is very much a relational view of mobility. When an individual undertakes a pilgrimage to a sacred site, the journey makes sense not purely in terms of an individual experience or in terms of the historical pattern of previous journeys, but in the relationship between the two the journey s meaning lies very much in following in the footsteps of others. Similarly, in Myerhoff s classic account of the peyote hunt in north central Mexico, the hunt draws its meaning both from the fact that it is collectively experienced by a group of people (not all copresent), and by the ways in which it is enmeshed in a larger cultural pattern [41]. 

The theoretical literature on supply chain collaboration is diversified representing multiple perspectives. The diverse literature reflects the versatile nature of supply chain collaboration involving a variety of motives and objectives (Barringer and Harrison 2000 Hitt 2011 Verdecho et al. 2012 Fawcett et al. 2012). This study examines supply chain collaboration from multiple perspectives (1) technical-economic perspective, e.g. uncertainty reduction, transaction cost economics, resource based view, relational view, and extended resource based view (2) sociopolitical perspective, e.g. resource dependence theory, social exchange theory, and social dilemma theory (3) trust based rationalism and (4) learning and knowledge perspective. These multiple perspectives provide us with insights into the nature, forms, contents, and forces of supply chain collaboration. 

Collaborative advantage is based on the relational view, which elaborates on the mechanisms of joint value creation (i.e., interfirm rent generation). It argues relational rents accrue at the collaboration level for mutual benefits. Unlike studies that acknowledge the role of both private and common benefits (Hamel 1991 Khanna et al. 1998), the relational view emphasizes common benefits that collaborative partners cannot generate independently. 

Resource based view, relational view, extended resource based view, and social dilemma theories perceive collaborative advantage (i.e., joint competitive advantage) as the consequence of supply chain collaboration. 

---