Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reduced effective representation potentials

The SPC model does not include an induction energy term. However, a revised version of this model, SPC/E, is based on a mean-field form (see earlier section on Electrostatics) for the induction term in Eq. [1]. Parameter changes resulted in a 3% increase of the charges. The revised potential generates a more stable hydrogen bond network than does SPC, as well as a self-diffusion coefficient that is in good agreement with experiment. The inclusion of the mean-field correction is also used by two other effective potentials, the and the reduced effective representation (RER) potentials. [Pg.225]

Fig 3 16 The effect of introducing a weak potential into the ID lattice is to lift ttie degeneracy of the energy levels near to the edge of the Brillouin zone (shown in both extended-zone and reduced-zone representation)... [Pg.151]

One more important difference between the GTO and PW approaches is that whereas in the former case the representation of both core and valence orbitals is the same, in the PW formalism the number of PW components needed to correctly describe the behavior of the wave function near the nucleus is prohibitively large. This problem is solved by modeling the core electrons using the pseudopotential approximation, in which it is assumed that the core electrons do not significantly influence the electronic structure and chemistry of atoms. The valence electrons of a particular atom are then considered to move in an effective ionic potential due to the core electrons and the nucleus. Same approach can also be applied to reduce the size of the GTO basis set in calculations without dramatic loss of accuracy. Furthermore, the use of pseudopotentials allows the inclusion of nonrelativistic effects in the calculations, which are particularly important for the chemistry of heavy elements. [Pg.121]

These so-called Pareto-based techniques do not force consolidation over multiple criteria in advance and aim to return a representation of the set of optimal compounds. They support discussion between team members who may have different views on the downstream impacts of different risk factors perhaps, for example, one team member may know that there is a reliable biomarker for one potential side-effect. This would then mean that assessing this risk need not consume much development time and cost, and the risk factor can have a reduced weighting within the target product profile being evolved by the team. [Pg.258]

In conclusion, the repulsive interactions arise from both a screened coulomb repulsion between nuclei, and from the overlap of closed inner shells. The former interaction can be effectively described by a bare coulomb repulsion multiplied by a screening function. The Moliere function, Eq. (5), with an adjustable screening length provides an adequate representation for most situations. The latter interaction is well described by an exponential decay of the form of a Bom-Mayer function. Furthermore, due to the spherical nature of the closed atomic orbitals and the coulomb interaction, the repulsive forces can often be well described by pair-additive potentials. Both interactions may be combined either by using functions which reduce to each interaction in the correct limits, or by splining the two forms at an appropriate interatomic distance . [Pg.288]

Representation of the density n(r) [or, effectively, the electrostatic potential — 0(r)] near any one of the sinks as an expansion in the monopole and dipole contribution only [as in eqn. (230c)] is generally, unsatisfactory. This is precisely the region where the higher multipole moments make their greatest contribution. However, the situation can be improved considerably. Felderhof and Deutch [25] suggested that the physical size of the sinks and dipoles be reduced from R to effectively zero, but that the magnitude of all the monopoles and dipoles, p/, are maintained, by the definition... [Pg.280]

This review shows how the photochemistry of ketones can be rationalized through a single model, the Tunnel Effect Theory (TET), which treats reactions of ketones as radiationless transitions from reactant to product potential energy curves (PEC). Two critical approximations are involved in the development of this theory (i) the representation of reactants and products as diatomic harmonic oscillators of appropriate reduced masses and force constants (ii) the definition of a unidimensional reaction coordinate (RC) as the sum of the reactant and product bond distensions to the transition state. Within these approximations, TET is used to calculate the reactivity parameters of the most important photoreactions of ketones, using only a partially adjustable parameter, whose physical meaning is well understood and which admits only predictable variations. [Pg.69]


See other pages where Reduced effective representation potentials is mentioned: [Pg.123]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.1305]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.4532]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.220]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.225 , Pg.226 , Pg.230 ]




SEARCH



Potentials representations

Reducible representation

© 2024 chempedia.info