Rate-Controlling Reactions

Reaction A2 -t B R -I- S, with A2 dissociated upon adsorption and with surface reaction rate controlling ... 

The polyelectrolyte covalently functionalized with reactive groups may be viewed as an enzyme-like functional polymer or as a molecular reaction system in the sense that it has both reactive centers and reaction rate-controlling microenvironments bound together on the same macromolecule. 

The reactivity modification or the reaction rate control of functional groups covalently bound to a polyelectrolyte is critically dependent on the strength of the electrostatic potential at the boundary between the polymer skeleton and the water phase ( molecular surface ). This dependence is due to the covalent bonding of the functional groups which fixes the reaction sites to the molecular surface of the polyelectrolyte. Thus, the surface potential of the polyion plays a decisive role in the quantitative interpretation of the reactivity modification on the molecular surface. 

The theoretical approach involved the derivation of a kinetic model based upon the chiral reaction mechanism proposed by Halpem (3), Brown (4) and Landis (3, 5). Major and minor manifolds were included in this reaction model. The minor manifold produces the desired enantiomer while the major manifold produces the undesired enantiomer. Since the EP in our synthesis was over 99%, the major manifold was neglected to reduce the complexity of the kinetic model. In addition, we made three modifications to the original Halpem-Brown-Landis mechanism. First, precatalyst is used instead of active catalyst in om synthesis. The conversion of precatalyst to the active catalyst is assumed to be irreversible, and a complete conversion of precatalyst to active catalyst is assumed in the kinetic model. Second, the coordination step is considered to be irreversible because the ratio of the forward to the reverse reaction rate constant is high (3). Third, the product release step is assumed to be significantly faster than the solvent insertion step hence, the product release step is not considered in our model. With these modifications the product formation rate was predicted by using the Bodenstein approximation. Three possible cases for reaction rate control were derived and experimental data were used for verification of the model. 

For the situation in Example 9-1, derive the result for t(/B) for reaction-rate control, that is, for the surface reaction as the rate-determining step (rds), and confirm that it is the... 

As noted by Froment and Bischoff (1990, p. 209), the case of surface-reaction-rate control is not consistent with the existence of a sharp core boundary in the SCM, since this case implies that diffusional transport could be slow with respect to the reaction rate. 

These results are, of course, the same as those obtained from equations 9.1-28 and -29 for the special case of reaction-rate control. 

Corresponding equations for the two special cases of gas-film mass-transfer control and surface-reaction-rate control may be obtained from these results (they may also be derived individually). The results for the latter case are of the same form as those for reaction-rate control in the SCM (see Table 9.1, for a sphere) with R0 replacing (constant) R (and (variable) R replacing rc in the development). The footnote in Example 9-2 does not apply here (explain why). 

For the reaction and assumptions in Example 22-1, except that reaction-rate control replaces ash-layer-diffusion control, suppose the feed contains 25% of particles of size R for which t = 1.5 h, 35% of particles of size 2R, and 40% of particles of size 3R. What residence time of solid particles, fB, is required for /B = 0.80 ... 

A triatomic molecule undergoes the reaction, A3 B + C, in contact with a catalytic surface. It dissociates completely on adsorption. Write rate equations for the two cases (a) Surface reaction rate controlling, adsorptive equilibrium of all participants maintained (b) Rate of desorption of substance B controlling, surface reaction equilibrium maintained. 

Net desorption rate of B controlling. (1) Surface reaction rate controlling,. 

Chemical Reaction Rate Controlled Process If the diffusion is very rapid compared to the rate of chemical reaction, then the concentration of water and EG can be considered to be nearly zero throughout the pellet and the rate of the reverse reaction can be neglected [21], This represents the maximum possible reaction rate. It is characterized by a linear molecular weight increase with respect to time and is also dependent on the starting molecular weight and the reaction rate constants ki and k2. 

In Equation (4.31) the rate constant is either the reaction rate constant or the transport rate constant, depending on which rate controls the dissolution process. If the reaction rate controls the dissolution process, then k. t becomes the rate of the reaction while if the dissolution process is controlled by the diffusion rate, then k j becomes the diffusion coefficient (diffusivity) divided by the thickness of the diffusion layer. It is interesting to note that both dissolution processes result in the same form of expression. From this equation the dependence on the solubility can be seen. The closer the bulk concentration is to the saturation solubility the slower the dissolution rate will become. Therefore, if the compound has a low solubility in the dissolution medium, the rate of dissolution will be measurably slower than if the compound has a high solubility in the same medium. 

As in Ref. 92 for a second-order gas-phase reaction where the prevailing pressure is sufficiently low for the O/F flame (Zone II of Figure 1) to be chemical-reaction rate controlled (high diffusional mixing rate), the chemical mass conversion rate in a zone of length LIIt ck at temperature Tg may be expressed as ... 

An implicit relationship for the burning rate at low pressure may now be found by substituting Lnf ch from Equation 8 for Ln in the heat balance (Equation 3a). Inherent in this step is the assumption that the pyrolyzed fuel and oxidizer gases start to react immediately on leaving the propellant surface. When = Ts (e.g., where the first gaseous reaction stage is very fast) the burning rate at low pressure where it is chemical-reaction rate controlled can be written as ... 

Because some of the reactions involved in establishing equilibrium at the membrane surface are slow compared to diffusion, the calculated concentration gradients formed in the liquid membrane do not have a simple form. The equations for partial reaction rate control have been derived by Ward and Robb [23],... 

This yields an important consequence for chemical conjugation on membrane catalysts the question about processes run in the same or in different zones of the reactor is of minor importance. Apparently, one of these possibilities will be predominant with respect to the type of conjugated reactions, for example, when strict demands are imposed on the conjugated reaction rate control. 

This problem was addressed by Van Deemter [1], who assumed a constant burning rate to obtain a solution in closed form. Later, Johnson et. al. [2] and Olson et al. [3] treated high-temperature, diffusion controlled burning, where the reaction rate depends only weakly on temperature. Both predicted the propagation of a sharply defined burn front, but neither gave any indication of what might happen at lower temperatures, where chemical reaction rate controls. This case was discussed by Ozawa [4], who showed that oxidation is slow and there is no clear burn front. 

At 316C inlet temperature, reaction rate controls, and the coke oxidizes slowly everywhere in the bed. There is no dis-cernable temperature wave and a significant concentration of oxygen leaves the bed throughout the bum. 

The calculations set out above were based on the assumption that the catalyst surface was always at a temperature of 900°K, however, practical experience during the investigation set out in Part 1, revealed that the catalyst temperature always increased with increase in gas flow-rate. The dotted curves in Figure 4 illustrate the effect of such a variation from 900°K to 1200°K at the highest velocity, for the different values of n. When diffusion controls, the surface temperature has no effect, but when the chemical reaction rate controls (n= 7) the overall rate increases... 

Because of the reaction rate control afforded by the organic media, the hydrogen reactor can be a simple device. Water and hydride slurry are metered into the reactor, where they are thoroughly mixed to ensure complete reaction. This reaction goes to completion quickly, leaving a powdery waste. Hydrogen production rate is controlled by the injection rate of water and hydride. Heat released by the reaction is removed by the evaporation of some of the added water. No complicated control systems are needed to ensure proper and safe operation of the hydrogen reactor. 

---