Reactant Species in Solution

It is essential to characterize the reactant species in solution. One of the problems, for example, in interpreting the rate law for oxidation by Ce(IV) or Co(III) arises from the difficulties in characterizing these species in aqueous solution, particularly the extent of formation of hydroxy or polymeric species. We used the catalyzed decomposition of HjOj by an Fe(III) macrocycle as an example of the initial rate approach (Sec. 1.2.1). With certain conditions, the iron complex dimerizes and this would have to be allowed for, since it transpires that the dimer is catalytically inactive. In a different approach, the problems of limited solubility, dimerization and aging of iron(III) and (Il)-hemin in aqueous solution can be avoided by intercalating the porphyrin in a micelle. Kinetic study is then eased. 

It must always be considered that a reactant is in fact a mixture of species. If these species are in labile equilibrium, or have similar reactivities, their presence will not show up as multiphasic kinetics. 

Recent H nmr studies of an equilibrated solution of Ni(cyclam) at 25°C shows that it contains in addition to Ni(cyclam) (HjO) (1) a mixture of about 15% of isomer RSRS 2, 

NH group is above the macrocyele plane). The results mean that previous studies of the Ni(II) macrocycle made with the assumption of only a single planar isomer in solution have to be reassessed. For a pair of esoteric examples of the importance and difficulties of characterization consider the following  

---

It can be assumed that in cycloadditions only one reactant is electronically excited, in view of the short lifetimes of excited species in solution and the consequently low probability of a collision between two excited molecules. Also, the cycloadditions are conducted with light of wavelengths above 2800 A... 

The standard electrode potentials , or the standard chemical potentials /X , may be used to calculate the free energy decrease —AG and the equilibrium constant /T of a corrosion reaction (see Appendix 20.2). Any corrosion reaction in aqueous solution must involve oxidation of the metal and reduction of a species in solution (an electron acceptor) with consequent electron transfer between the two reactants. Thus the corrosion of zinc ( In +zzn = —0-76 V) in a reducing acid of pH = 4 (a = 10 ) may be represented by the reaction ... 

At this stage of development of the subject it is appropriate to consider a number of empirical rules which may serve to indicate the important variables. It would seem likely that (i) there will be competitition between each species in the system for the sites available at the electrode surface, and that (ii) for each species in the system there will be an equilibrium between the solution and the adsorbed state. Thus it would be expected that the solution constituents would affect these equilibria in two ways (a) if one of the constituents of the medium is itself adsorbed, the reactant will tend to be displaced (b) if the reactant is strongly solvated, complexed or ion paired by constituents of the medium, the species in solution will be favoured. 

Burns and Curtiss (1972) and Burns et al. (1984) have used the Facsimile program developed at AERE, Harwell to obtain a numerical solution of simultaneous partial differential equations of diffusion kinetics (see Eq. 7.1). In this procedure, the changes in the number of reactant species in concentric shells (spherical or cylindrical) by diffusion and reaction are calculated by a march of steps method. A very similar procedure has been adopted by Pimblott and La Verne (1990 La Verne and Pimblott, 1991). Later, Pimblott et al. (1996) analyzed carefully the relationship between the electron scavenging yield and the time dependence of eh yield through the Laplace transform, an idea first suggested by Balkas et al. (1970). These authors corrected for the artifactual effects of the experiments on eh decay and took into account the more recent data of Chernovitz and Jonah (1988). Their analysis raises the yield of eh at 100 ps to 4.8, in conformity with the value of Sumiyoshi et al. (1985). They also conclude that the time dependence of the eh yield and the yield of electron scavenging conform to each other through Laplace transform, but that neither is predicted correctly by the diffusion-kinetic model of water radiolysis. 

Since we have provided initial and final temperatures but have not specified any reactants, the program traces a polythermal path for a closed system (see Chapter 14). The fluid s pH (Fig. 23.1) changes with temperature from its initial value of 5 at 250 °C to less than 4 at 25 °C. The change is entirely due to variation in the stabilities of the aqueous species in solution. As shown in Figure 23.2, the H+ concentration increases in response to the dissociation of the HC1 ion pair,... 

The rate of an electrode reaction is a function of three principle types of species charge carriers on the surface, active surface atoms and reactant species in the solution as illustrated in Figure 23. That is, r cc [h] [Siactive] [A]. Carrier concentration and reactant concentration do not, in general, depend on surface orientation while active surface atoms may be a function of surface orientation. Anisotropic effect occurs when the rate determining step depends on the active surface atoms that vary with crystal orientation of the surface. On the other hand, reactions are isotropic when the concentration of active surface atoms is not a function of surface orientation or when the rate determining step does not involve active surface atoms. 

The negative sign arises because there is a loss of reactant. The value of n is often 1, but a value other than unity arises when one molecule of the reactant produces other than one molecule of the product. Rates are usually expressed in moles per liter per second, which we shall designate M s , although dm mol s is also a popular abbreviation. The rate law expresses the rate of a reaction in terms of the concentrations of the reactants and of any other species in solution, including the products, that may affect the rate. ... 

The materials that change colour on passing a charge are called electrochromes, and these can be classified into three groups. In the first type the colouring species remain in solution in the second type the reactants are in solution but the coloured product is a solid the third type are those where all the materials are solids, e.g. in films. The first type is used in car, anti-dazzle, rear-view mirrors, the second type in larger mirrors for commercial vehicles and the third type in smart windows (see section 1.5.4.2). 

In order to calculate the density of reactant B about A, it is necessary to know by what means the reactants migrate in solution. Under most circumstances, diffusion is a very adequate description (the limitations of and complications to diffusion are discussed in Sect. 6, Chap. 8 Sect. 2 and Chap. 11). In this simple analysis of diffusion, Fick s laws will be used with little further justification, save to note that Fick s second law is identical to the equation satisfied by a random walk function. Hardly a surprising result, because diffusion is a random walk with no retention of information about where the diffusing species was before its current location. In Chap. 3 Sect. 1, the diffusion equation is derived from thermodynamic considerations and the continuity equation (law of conservation of mass). 

The rates of bimolecular reaction between two extremely reactive species in solution may be limited by the rate at which the two species diffuse together such reactions are referred to as diffusion-controlled. Solvent will affect the rate of these reactions by hindering the mobility of the reactants and, consequently, the rate constant is a function of solvent viscosity. Typically, radical-radical (termination) reactions are diffusion-controlled and thus their rates are governed by solvent viscosity. 

Using the carbamazepine-nicotinamide cocrystal system, a mathematical model has been developed to predict the solubility of cocrystals [41], The model predicted that the solubility of a solid cocrystal is determined by the solubility products of the reactant species and solution complexa-tion constants that could be obtained from the performance of solubility studies. In addition, graphical methods were developed to use the dependence of cocrystal solubility on ligand concentration for evaluation of the stoichiometry of the solution-phase complexes that are the precursor to the crystalline cocrystal itself. It was proposed that the dependence of cocrystal solubility on solubility product and complexation constants would aid in the design of screening protocols, and would provide guidance for systems where crystallization of the cocrystal did not take place. 

The reorganization of the solute about reacting species is not limited to catalytic complexes, however. Studies of nucleophilicity of reactant species in ILs [262, 263] found that in some cases the nucleophilicity of solute species depends strongly on the character of the cation, though in others the association appears to be relatively weak [264]. In some cases, desolvation of solvent ions is limited by unfavorable entropic effects rather than enthalpic ones [262], This likely relates to the highly structured nature of the solvent, which can run counter to intuitive relationships between the entropy of free and bound states. Harper and Kobrak [14] reviewed this literature in detail, and we will not discuss it further here. 

We recall that the current is a very sensitive measure of the rate of an electrochemical reaction. It is therefore quite easy to determine the current-potential relationship without causing a significant change in the concentration of either reactants or products. Thus, measurements in electrode kinetics are conducted effectively under quasi-zero-order kinetic conditions. It would be wrong to infer from this that electrode reactions are independent of concentration. To determine the concentration dependence (i.e., the reaction order), one must obtain a series of HE or //ri plots and derive from them plots of log i versus logC. at different potentials, as shown in Fig. IF. The slopes in Fig. lF(b) yield the parameter p since p = (alog i/alogC.) is measured at constant potential E. Here, and in all further equations, we shall assume that T, P, and the concentration of all other species in solution are kept constant, to permit us to write the equations in a more concise form. 

Prockl et al. [60] measured the concentration of leached Pd species from palladium nanoparticles supported on a metal oxide via atomic absorption spectroscopy as a function of time in solution. The data indicated that the largest concentration of Pd species in solution (Pd " and/or Pd(0)) occurred during the reaction (Fig. 18.6). As the reaction neared 100% conversion, the soluble Pd concentration returned to the original value, presumably due to readsorption onto the metal oxide substrate. The process was concluded by the authors to have clearly involved heterogeneous reactions [60]. This data supports a catalytic mechanism that is heterogeneous in nature, where the reaction occurs at the interface and causes the dissolution of surface atoms into solution. This explanation is supported by the report of Prockl et al. that individual reactants did not initiate nanoparticle dissolution but that dissolution was observed during the reaction over the 25-50 min time interval when the conversion was the highest (Fig. 18.6). 

Chemical Quenching. Many photochemical reactions of organic compounds are known to occur via intermolecular interactions of the excited species with reactant molecules in solution. Common examples which may involve this mechanism include the photo-reduction of ketones by hydrogen donor solvents and many photo-dimerizations (227). The scarcity of quenching reactions of metal complexes that have been attributed to chemical processes has already been discussed by Balzani et al. (204). With the increasing interest in the mechanistic aspects of OTM complex photochemistry, however, many more examples should be discovered. 

Solvent polarity can restrict the possibilities for reaction paths. Whenever charged species are present in a reaction, the reaction barrier is highly dependent on the polarity of the solvent (Fig. 2.27). Solvent stabilization of the reactants more than the products decreases reactivity. Solvent stabilization of the products more than the reactants increases reactivity. In addition to stabilizing ions, polar protic solvents can also allow proton transfer and equilibration between the various ionic species in solution. 

---