Ratio slider

The Ratio slider sets the slope of the compression line, raising and lowering the final node on the graph. The zero line is at a ratio of 1 1, resulting in no compression. A 2 0 ratio above 124 dB means that for every 2 dB increase in gain above 124 dB, the gain will be rednced 1 dB. So 122 dB signals will be lowered to 123 dB, 112 dB In to 118 dB Ont and 0 dB In to -12 dB Out. 

Continuous binary distillation is illustrated by the simulation example CON-STILL. Here the dynamic simulation example is seen as a valuable adjunct to steady state design calculations, since with MADONNA the most important column design parameters (total column plate number, feed plate location and reflux ratio) come under the direct control of the simulator as facilitated by the use of sliders. Provided that sufficient simulation time is allowed for the column conditions to reach steady state, the resultant steady state profiles of composition versus plate number are easily obtained. In this way, the effects of changes in reflux ratio or choice of the optimum plate location on the resultant steady state profiles become almost immediately apparent. 

Continuous multicomponent distillation simulation is illustrated by the simulation example MCSTILL, where the parametric runs facility of MADONNA provides a valuable means of assessing the effect of each parameter on the final steady state. It is thus possible to rapidly obtain the optimum steady state settings for total plate number, feed plate number and column reflux ratio via a simple use of sliders. 

Forced Convection. An additional complication arises from convection in the melt forced by the motion of the slider and only marginally assisted by the gas flow above the melt. Forced convection will transport solute across the substrate from the back edge. Moving a solid horizontal boundary across the bottom of an initially stagnant and semiinfinite liquid is a classical problem of unsteady viscous flow (91). The ratio of the velocity of the fluid in the direction of motion, v(y), to the solid-boundary velocity, V, is given by... 

If the gross cross-sectional area of the slider, the load and the effectivity ratio Z stay constant for the duration of the sliding, then q and I will also remain constant and... 

FT-IR spectrometers cannot be built as double-beam instruments. Unlike dispersive instruments, FT-IR spectrometers acquire single channel spectra of sample and reference and their ratio is calculated afterwards (Fig. 4.2). Sample and reference may automatically be replaced by a sample slider, or the IR beam may be switched between sample and reference by flip-mirrors. In the case of higher accumulation numbers, the instrument switches repeatedly between sample and reference scan. 

Having described a circuit for controlling the position of a control rod, 1 will now describe its operation, considering the safety rods withdrawn. Slider 203 on resistor 205, having previously been calibrated in terms of neutron density, is moved to the density position at which it is desired e reactor to operate, taking into account the difference in neutron density at the center of the lattice and at the periphery thereof during operation. This difference is a constant ratio at various operative densities. The reactor, having at best a neutron density much lower... 

Fig.7 Minimum film thickness versiis slider-roll ratios at different n and mo.

An encouraging experience from this example is the relative insensitivity of the result on the mesh size. Since all nodes of the coarse mesh are repeated in the fine mesh, one can compare the computed pressure values at these nodes directly. The ratios of the computed film pressure using the coarse mesh to that using the fine mesh at all common mesh nodes are shown in Table 1. Indices "i" and "j" respectively mark nodes along and across sliding. The entrance of of the slider film is at (1=0) and the center-line is at (j=3). The biggest discrepancy is a modest 5.9%. It is of interest to note that the coarse mesh calculation onsistently yields a lower value of film pressure than that from the fine mesh calculation. The residual inaccuracy in film pressure exhibits a second order trend. 

Finally, Figs. 7 to 9 show the velocity, temperature and pressure profiles for a flat slider with 4/1 filsKthickness ratio. These calculations were performed to test the sensitivity of the analysis to flow reversal at the entrance. As mentioned earlier, such reversal can cause problems for point-by-polnt prediction siethods. We have yet to make any comparisons with other investigations. 

I m always amazed to run into lively discussion on technological topics that I once thought put to bed. In our earliest introduction to the study of the physical science in high school we addressed the problem of friction - measuring the force required to move a slider over a flat surface. We were taught that the ratio of the force required to keep the slider in uniform motion to the force holding the slider to the surface was a constant called the "coefficient of friction". What our teachers often neglected to tell us was that the coefficient of friction wasn t always a constant and that there was a lot of physics buried in that constant which was obscured from our view. And the problem is especially complicated when the materials of concern are as complicated as polymers. 

Unfortunately, the effect of the shape of the slider on the ratio F/N is almost unknown. However, stress patterns produced by a wedge dragged over a plate of transparent rubber was not significantly different from that observed when the slider was a hemisphere also, when the wedge was asymmetric, it did not matter whether the more or the less inclined face of it was advancing [l8]. Evidently, these observations are in accord with the deformation theory of polymer friction as long as w and d remain constant, it matters little what the actual profile of the indenter is. 

A few results could be found in the literature for the relation between F/N and the radius of a hemispherical or spherical slider. When this radius R was [20] 0.285, 1-33, and 10.0 cm, respectively, F/N was 0.4, 0.46, and 0.57- The slider was of glass, the polymer was Nylon-66, and N was constant at 10 dynes. From Hertz s theory for ideally elastic materials, the product wd is independent of R (w is proportional to the cubic root of R and d is inversely proportional to this root). It is seen that F/N also was little affected by the radius when R rose in the ratio of 35 to 1, F/N increased only in the ratio 1.4 to 1. Presumably it was not quite constant because Nylon-66 was not a Hookean solid. The change of the track width with R also seems to confirm the poor applicability of Hertz s equation to nylon this width increased less steeply than did the cubic root of R. 

---