Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Random deposition

Commercial processes Commercial electroless nickel plating stems from an accidental discovery by Brenner and Riddell made in 1944 during the electroplating of a tube, with sodium hypophosphite added to the solution to reduce anodic oxidation of other bath constituents. This led to a process available under licence from the National Bureau of Standards in the USA. Their solutions contain a nickel salt, sodium hypophosphite, a buffer and sometimes accelerators, inhibitors to limit random deposition and brighteners. The solutions are used as acid baths (pH 4-6) or, less commonly, as alkaline baths (pH 8-10). Some compositions and operating conditions are given in Table 13.17 . [Pg.535]

The random deposition model represented by Eq. (4.1) produces a mono tonic increase of surface width with time. [Pg.168]

In the AFM images of Figure 12.15, one can see many separated and randomly deposited globular particles on the mica surface. In each image, the particles appear to be substantially uniform in size, i.e. they are essentially monodisperse. This is not surprising if each bright spot represents a single dendrimer molecule. [Pg.298]

Taking into consideration the Si—O bonds within the glass surface, the difference between a strongly reacted layer and a highly polymerized network is difficult to define. However, with the above model the siloxane layer also contains partially polymerized structural units and/or hydrolysed remnants of the three-dimensional layer which would be expected from the random deposition of the hydrolysed APS. Consequently, some fragments may arise from pendant chains. Thus, the actual struture of the deposit will consist of a poly-siloxane probably chemically bonded to the glass surface every third silicon atom. [Pg.363]

The observed almost universal value of the surface fractal dimension ds 2.6 of furnace blacks can be traced back to the conditions of disordered surface growth during carbon black processing. It compares very well to the results evaluated within the an-isotropic KPZ-model as well as numerical simulations of surface growth found for random deposition with surface relaxation. This is demonstrated in some detail in [18]. [Pg.19]

Disordered physisorption—that is, random deposition of molecules from the vapor phase to a metal substrate—will usually yield random orientations and poor packing, while a preferential orientation of an asymmetric molecule may be needed for organic device performance. [Pg.805]

To obtain numerically the mass transfer coefficient, a porous medium is stochastically constructed in the form of a sphere pack. Specifically, the representation of the biphasic domains under consideration is achieved by the random deposition of spheres of radius Rina box of length L. The structure is digitized and the phase function (equal to zero for solid and unity for the pore space) is determined in order to obtain the porosity and to solve numerically the convection- diffusion problem. The next for this purpose is to obtain the detailed flow field in the porous domain through the solution of the Stokes equations ... [Pg.756]

Hemoproteins are a broad class of redox-proteins that act as cofactors, e.g. cytochrome c, or as biocatalysts, e.g. peroxidases. Direct ET between peroxidases such as horseradish peroxidase, lactoperoxidase," or chloropcroxidasc"" and electrode surfaces, mainly carbonaceous materials, were extensively studied. The mechanistic aspects related with the immobilized peroxidases on electrode surfaces and their utilization in developing biosensor devices were reviewed in detail. The direct electrical contact of peroxidases with electrodes was attributed to the location of the heme site at the exterior of the protein that yields close contact with the electrode surface even though the biocatalyst is randomly deposited on the electrode. For example, it was reported " that non-oriented randomly deposited horseradish peroxidase on a graphite electrode resulted in 40-50% of the adsorbed biocatalyst in an electrically contacted configuration. For other hemoproteins such as cytochrome c it was found that the surface modification of the electrodes with promoter units such as pyridine units induced the binding of the hemoproteins in an orientation that facilitated direct electron transfer. By this method, the promoter sites induce a binding-ET process-desorption mechanism at the modified electrode. Alternatively, the site-specific covalent attachment of hemoproteins such as cytochrome c resulted in the orientation of the protein on the electrode surfaces and direct ET communication. ... [Pg.59]

Surface scaling parameters for a number of nonequilibrium atomistic models have also been established [6, 10]. Continuum equations for the surface motion have to be used to find a solution for discrete models. Thus, for ballistic deposition [14] and the Eden model [15] the inter ce saturates, resulting in a = 1/2 and P = 1/3 for Z>pop = 2, and a 0.35 and 0.21 for Z>top = 3. Conversely, from the random deposition model P - 1/2 and, since the correlation length is always zero, fire interface does not saturate and, therefore, a is not defined. Depending on the rules used in the simulations, for the atomistic model including surfece difrusion a = 3/2 and p = 3/7 [6], a = 3/2 and p =... [Pg.62]


See other pages where Random deposition is mentioned: [Pg.265]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.93]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.194 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.543 , Pg.544 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.207 ]




SEARCH



Deposition at Random Site Surfaces

Random deposition model

© 2024 chempedia.info