Quasireversibility, electrochemical

In contrast, let us examine a case of very important structural consequences. As we will discuss in Chapter 7, Section 2.4, the carbonyl cluster [Os6(CO)18] undergoes a two-electron reduction with marked features of electrochemical quasireversibility AEp = 255 mV at 0.01 Vs 1. 

We must conclude that the marked electrochemical quasireversibility is due to the remarkable geometrical reorganization from the bicapped tetrahedron of [Os6(CO)18] to the octahedron of [Os6(CO)i8]2 occurring upon the two electron addition. 

It is important to underline finally that quasireversibility is an electrochemical criterion and it does not means partial chemical reversibility . 

It should be emphasized that [VO(salen)] in its oxidized form [VO(salen)]+ ([C104]- counteranion) maintains the original square-pyramidal geometry, but, in accord with the electrochemical quasireversibility of the couple Viv/Vv, there are some variations in bond... 

From a speculative viewpoint, the quasireversibility of the electrochemical reduction Viv/Vm could account for such structural rearrangements. 

In the absence of crystallographic data one cannot discuss in detail the structural variations triggered by these reduction processes, but their electrochemical reversibility, or quasireversibility, suggests that there are not significant structural rearrangements. 

The electrochemical behaviour of this acetato complex has not been reported, but the analogous benzoato derivative [Mn402(C>2CPh)7 (bipy)2]+ in dichloromethane solution displays a quasireversible one-electron reduction to the corresponding neutral derivative MnnMn3in E°< = + 0.28 V vs. SCE) and a quasireversible one-electron oxidation to the corresponding dication Mn3mMnIV ( 4/ = +1.34 V).66... 

From a comparison of the bond lengths one can deduce that the electron addition causes a structural distortion consistent with a significant shortening of the Fe-P distances and a lengthening of the Fe-C distance. This distortion might be responsible for the electrochemical quasireversibility of the corresponding redox process. 

Figure 87, which refers to [Coni(Me2[14]py-dieneN4)(MeCN)2]3 +, shows that, as expected, these complexes display the gradual reduction sequence CoIII II/I 0, with features of electrochemical quasireversibility (E3/4-E1/4 slightly higher than 56.4). 

The oxidation product obtained by controlled potential electrolysis, [Ni(3,5-Cl2saloph)] +, shows an EPR spectrum typical of a Ni(III) ion (d7 - low spin) having an octahedral coordination, which is attributed to the axial coordination of two solvent molecules.153 Therefore, from a speculative viewpoint, it could be assumed that the electrochemical quasireversibility is due to the change in coordination from square planar to octahedral. 

It displays two successive reductions, corresponding to the sequence Cu(II)/Cu(I)/Cu(0). The first step (E° = + 0.19 V) is chemically reversible (ipJipc = 1) but electrochemically quasireversible (A2sp = 145 mV, at 0.2 V s 1) the second step is irreversible ( p = -0.65 V). The appearance of peak C in the backscan reveals, by its characteristic pointed lineshape, the presence of a process known as anodic stripping . This consists of the sudden reoxidation of the metallic copper that has been deposited on the electrode surface during the Cu(I)/Cu(0) reduction. 

As shown in Figure 33, this compound undergoes a single two-electron reduction with marked characteristics of electrochemical quasireversibility (A p = 255 mV, at 0.01 V s 1). 

Since such correlations belong to a series of treatments which are commonly identified as Linear Free Energy Relationships (LFER), and as only the standard potential is an electrochemical quantity directly linked with free energy (AG° = -n F AE°), one can make use of these mathematical treatments only in cases of electrochemically reversible redox processes (or in the limit of quasireversibility). Only in these cases does the measured redox potential have thermodynamic significance. 

The physical meaning of the kinetic parameter m is identical as for surface electrode reaction (Chap. 2.5.1). The electrochemical reversibility is primarily controlled by 03 (Fig. 2.71). The reaction is totally irreversible for log(m) < —3 and electrochemically reversible for log(fo) > 1. Between these intervals, the reaction appears quasireversible, attributed with a quasireversible maximum. Though the absolute net peak current value depends on the adsorption parameter. Fig. 2.71 reveals that the quasireversible interval, together with the position of the maximum, is independent of the adsorption strength. Similar to the surface reactions, the position of the maximum varies with the electron transfer coefficient and the amphtude of the potential modrrlation [92]. 

Similar to the pure surface electrode reaction, the response of reaction (2.146) is characterized by splitting of the net peak under appropriate conditions. The splitting occurs for an electrochemically quasireversible reaction and vanishes for the pure reversible reaction. Typical regions where the splitting emerges are 3 < m < 10 and 0.1 < r < 10 for a = 0.5 and i sw = 50 mV. Contrary to the surface electrode reaction where the ratio of the split peak currents is solely sensitive to a, in the present system this ratio depends additionally on r. For instance, if a = 0.5 and r = 1 the ratio is = 1 for r = 10, > 1 and r = 0.1, < 1. Finally it is worth mentioning when experimentally possible, the electrode mechanism represented by (2.145) to (2.147) has to be simplified to a simple surface reaction (Sect. 2.5.1) in order to avoid the complexity arising from the effect of diffusion mass transport. 

The charge transfer kinetics of azobenzene at the mercury electrode is slower than that of methylene blue, thus the frequency interval provided by modem instra-mentation (10 < //Hz < 2000) allows variation of the electrochemical reversibility of the electrode reaction over a wide range [79]. The quasireversible maxima measured by the reduction of azobenzene in media at different pH ate shown in Fig. 2.47 in the previous Sect. 2.5.1. The position of the quasireversible maximum depends on pH hence the estimated standard rate constant obeys the following dependence A sur = (62-12pH) S- for pH < 4. These results confirm the quasite-versible maximum can be experimentally observed for a single electrode reaction by varying the frequency, as predicted by analysis in Fig. 2.75. 

For a given adsorption constant, the observed electrochemical reversibility depends on the kinetic parameter defined as (O = Xy, or (o =. This reveals that the inherent properties of reaction (2.208) are very close to surface electrode reactions elaborated in Sect. 2.5. The quasireversible maximum is strongly pronounced, being represented by a sharp parabolic dependence of vs. m. The important feature of the maximum is its sensitivity to the adsorption constant, defined by the following equation ... 

The second-order reaction with adsorption of the ligand (2.210) signifies the most complex cathodic stripping mechanism, which combines the voltammetric features of the reactions (2.205) and (2.208) [137]. For the electrochemically reversible case, the effect of the ligand concentration and its adsorption strength is identical as for reaction (2.205) and (2.208), respectively. A representative theoretical voltammo-gram of a quasireversible electrode reaction is shown in Fig. 2.86d. The dimensionless response is controlled by the electrode kinetic parameter m, the adsorption... 

As the electrochemical reaction is confined to the boundaries of the thin film, the voltammetric response exhibits a quasireversible maximum. The position of the quasireversible maximum on the log frequency axis depends on the kinetics of the overall reaction at the thin-film electrode, i.e., reflecting the coupled electron-ion transfer (4.3). Analyzing the evolution of the quasireversible maximum measured with different redox probes and various transferring ions, it has been demonstrated... 

In this solvent, using CV and Osteryoung square-wave voltammetry (OSWV) under high vacuum conditions at room temperature, Cgo displays a one-electron, chemically reversible oxidation wave at +1.26 V vs. Fc/Fc+. TBAPFe was used as the supporting electrolyte. Under the same conditions, the first one-electron oxidation of C70 occurs at +1.20 V, 60 mV more negative (easier to oxidize) than that of Cgo- Both oxidations are electrochemically quasireversible with A pp = 80 mV. In addition, a second oxidation wave is observed for C70 close to the limit of the solvent potential window at+1.75 V. However, this wave appears to be chemically irreversible (see Fig. 3) [36]. 

---